-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:08:30 +0100
Source: trac
Binary: trac
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Trac Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:06:25 +0100
Source: trac
Binary: trac
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Trac Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:23:12 +0100
Source: trac
Binary: trac
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Trac Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:46:20 +0100
Source: trac
Binary: trac
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Trac Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED
embedded (i.e. a packaged)
library a bug... Are there known cases where this is a required condition?
Yes, dpkg for example links statically against libbz2 and zlib just to
pick a famous example.
Kind regards
Nico
So ... do as i say, don't do as i do !!!
kind regards
Luis Matos
- install all the packages.
examples:
apt-backport install anjuta -t sid
this would download all needed dependencies from sid, recompile the
needed and install all.
apt-backport build anjuta -t sid
builds the needed dependencies and anjuta
is this doable?
Luis Matos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Seg, 2007-09-03 às 14:46 +0200, Sebastian Harl escreveu:
Hi Luis,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:09:14PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
how about the development of tool on we could:
- add the sid repos to sources.list
This should be done manually, it only has to be done once anyway
Seg, 2007-09-03 às 09:05 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez escreveu:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:09:14PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
how about the development of tool on we could:
- add the sid repos to sources.list
- with a simple command download every needed source package
(dependencies
Qua, 2007-08-08 às 20:30 +0200, Hendrik Sattler escreveu:
Additionally, it should be noted that a desktop task has nothing with
multimedia (means: surprise, you can use a desktop without music and
movies).
I think we need to have multiple desktop tasks. One desktop-simple,
Qui, 2007-08-09 às 14:10 +0200, Michael Banck escreveu:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
Qua, 2007-08-08 às 20:30 +0200, Hendrik Sattler escreveu:
Additionally, it should be noted that a desktop task has nothing with
multimedia (means: surprise, you can use
Qui, 2007-08-09 às 15:24 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu:
Btw, desktop-c-gtk-devel and desktop-python-gtk-devel makes no sense,
IMHO. It's too specific that we will need
desktop-$every_language_in_debian-gtk-devel. What a task like
desktop-php-devel will contain, vim? For those who like emacs
Qui, 2007-08-09 às 10:42 -0700, Joey Hess escreveu:
Luis Matos wrote:
having a console tasksel is not enough ... someone was developing a gtk+
front end ... right?
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=gnome tasksel ?
that's a pretty hack ... why does tasksel does not get the debconf
option on which front
Qui, 2007-07-19 às 02:43 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi escreveu:
Hi
Can someone tell me what happened to the g77-3.4-doc package? Or better,
How can I get a manual page for g77?
Why I need this:- I was trying to compile refblas3 package with gfortran
instead of g77. reflblas3's
Sex, 2007-07-06 às 18:47 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz escreveu:
Hi,
My development workstation is running Debian, and I'd like to produce
both .deb and .rpm releases of my software.
you can easily use virtual machines like xen and qemu to build and test
them.
--
Bernd Zeimetz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dom, 2007-06-24 às 17:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Hello devolpers,
I want devolp packages for debian, must I make it in stable or testing?
check your timetable ... do you want to develop your application to
start to use in th next two months or 2 years?
the first one, develop in
LOL ... i don't know why, i understand that he wanted to develop some
application for debian ... well .. i must not be in one of my days!
Dom, 2007-06-24 às 18:02 +0200, Guus Sliepen escreveu:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 05:25:29PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
Dom, 2007-06-24 às 17:05 +0200, [EMAIL
Qua, 2007-06-13 às 20:27 -0400, Felipe Sateler escreveu:
Luis Matos wrote:
Qua, 2007-06-13 às 18:09 -0400, Felipe Sateler escreveu:
Installing a newer kernel is not an upgrade, in a sense. You are
installing new software alongside the old one. Thus the usual
expectations don't hold
Qua, 2007-06-13 às 17:49 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:32:01PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
Um, no. That does not happen automatically. In rare cases it happens
because the release team has overridden the installability check for a
package, because
Qui, 2007-06-14 às 13:08 +0200, Emanuele Rocca escreveu:
* Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-06-14 1:14 +0100]:
Qui, 2007-06-14 às 01:04 +0200, Emanuele Rocca escreveu:
Another option could be calling each snapshot cut -MM, or cut
-MM-DD if we plan to release them more than
Qui, 2007-06-14 às 19:18 +0200, Josselin Mouette escreveu:
Le jeudi 14 juin 2007 à 14:33 +0100, Luis Matos a écrit :
I just want that automatic passages from unstable for testing, when
debian is not in a pre-stable-release state have more verifications such
as reverse depends.
I really
as _special_ option.
--
Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui, 2007-06-14 às 14:40 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu:
It's an example that does not support your thesis. I have explained
to you
that packages are *not* propagated automatically to testing when they
break
the installability of other packages present in testing; that the
nvidia
modules
Ter, 2007-06-12 às 17:03 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 12:42:34AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
Ter, 2007-06-12 às 22:05 +0200, Frans Pop escreveu:
Personally I think the current system is fine.
just a note, as user:
The current system is fine but:
- priority
Qua, 2007-06-13 às 03:45 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:28:52AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
look ... i don't want guaranties ... you know what i mean ... want a
place where it says testing HAS security support, we focus on having it
stable. I don't want written
Qua, 2007-06-13 às 12:39 +0200, Gabor Gombas escreveu:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:28:52AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
kernel upgrades from 2.6.50 to 2.6.51 ... nvidia packages don't build in
time (they are not free, right?) ... kernel passes to testing ...
automatically, the nvidia-module
Qua, 2007-06-13 às 14:16 -0700, Russ Allbery escreveu:
Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but why should I??? this goes against the testing is always *WORKING*
phrase. TESTING IS NOT ALWAYS WORKING.
Having to use module-assistant != not working.
having a working system *with* only
Qua, 2007-06-13 às 15:00 -0700, Russ Allbery escreveu:
Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
having a working system *with* only debian *oficial* packages and then
after an upgrade that system stops working properly, i call it a
regression ...
If you're using non-free drivers, the first
Qua, 2007-06-13 às 18:09 -0400, Felipe Sateler escreveu:
Luis Matos wrote:
Qua, 2007-06-13 às 14:16 -0700, Russ Allbery escreveu:
Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but why should I??? this goes against the testing is always *WORKING*
phrase. TESTING IS NOT ALWAYS WORKING
- this was a bad joke).
Having this *release* would make people to use more debian.
Of course the system would be continuously updated.
ciao,
ema
best regards,
Luis Matos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qua, 2007-06-13 às 16:18 -0700, Russ Allbery escreveu:
For non-free, this is inevitable without significant changes to the
way
that Debian works that I don't believe will happen. Debian has
provided a
different solution in the form of module-assistant that in my
experience
works great. I
Qua, 2007-06-13 às 19:20 -0400, David Nusinow escreveu:
By the time it hit testing it worked pretty well for most people. We
broke
a few things, but it was nice for just about everyone. Everyone except
those people using proprietary drivers, but they know they've already
dug
their own grave
)
...
...
So ... automatically pass to testing ... is bad.
So ... more package tests are need (such as test reverse depends)
Then, announce snapshots and that testing is (+/-) STABLE, USABLE and
SECURE, presenting users with a clear message in debian's site.
best regards
Luis Matos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Ter, 2007-06-12 às 23:32 +0200, Vince HK escreveu:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 12/06/07 at 22:23 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
NO!
unstable is meant for packages that should be in the next stable release,
as such only packages that are in the maintainer's opinion ready to
migrate
to
and debian contributers ... if i had not said this before,
You're Cool. (ok, i'm cool too).
best regards
Luis Matos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sex, 2007-06-08 às 06:21 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez escreveu:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:36:57AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
Sex, 2007-06-08 às 09:58 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine escreveu:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:24:48AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:59:38AM
Sex, 2007-06-08 às 13:01 +0200, Gabor Gombas escreveu:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:36:57AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
i have 2 servers that i only login for apt-get update apt-get upgrade
-y, they are running sarge (yet) and only install security upgrades.
These 2 server will not be put
Frank Küster escreveu:
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Tim Cutts wrote:
(aside: I'd love it if we could have some sort of user package
system which could allow non-root users to install software packages
in areas they have access to, and yet have full
Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:14, Anthony Towns wrote:
I'm not sure if avoiding duplicating the data (1G of data is bad, but
1G of the same data in a .orig.tar.gz _and_ a .deb is absurd) is enough
to just use the existing archive and mirror network, or if it'd still
be worth
maybe you can use the debianart.org platform.
Dom, 2007-05-27 às 09:30 -0400, Kevin Mark escreveu:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 11:35:26AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
Yes, a complete redesign of the website is a herculean task, but
contributing to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 22:46:56 +0100
Source: trac
Binary: trac
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.10.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jesus Climent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
typo:
http://freeassociation.sourceforge.net/
two s's in association.
Qui, 2007-05-17 às 17:03 +0200, Michal Čihař escreveu:
Hi
I wanted to find out more about this library, but...
On Thu, 17 May 2007 16:27:31 +0200
Wilfried Goesgens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Frank Küster escreveu:
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How long should bugs be tagged pending in advance of an upload?
Is it acceptable to tag a bug pending when fixed upstream and the
maintainer is confident of an upstream release in under a week? (This
is easy for me, I'm also
.
best regards
Luis Matos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dom, 2007-05-13 às 00:43 +0200, Tim Dijkstra escreveu:
On Wed, 9 May 2007 17:49:18 -0300
André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
The user can put the follows categories:
- Wallpaper
- Splash screen
- Icon
- System sound
- Logo
- Usplash
- T-shirt
oh ... dot com is already taken...
http://09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63.com/
best regards
Luis Matos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui, 2007-04-26 às 19:37 +0930, Stef Daniels escreveu:
Hi again,
On 26/04/07, Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think you should read the 'fine' instalation manual where it says that
you can select the desktop at boot prompt
Yes the doc's are great and well done, however
Qui, 2007-04-26 às 04:02 +0930, Stef Daniels escreveu:
Hi Greg and others,
On 26/04/07, Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like these:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r0/i386/iso-cd/debian-40r0-i386-kde-CD-1.iso
Qua, 2007-04-25 às 13:50 -0500, David Moreno Garza escreveu:
Steve Greenland wrote:
I'd guess that Bugzilla's mandatory registration is why. OTOH,
Bugzilla's mandatory is why I rarely report bugs for projects that use
Bugzilla. I don't think making it harder for users to report problems is
Qua, 2007-04-25 às 13:53 -0500, David Moreno Garza escreveu:
That's why the Debian CD team provides Kebian and Xebian for you
:-)
calling them like this would make kde people and xfce people to look
more to debian ... or not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Ter, 2007-04-24 às 16:44 +0200, Michelle Konzack escreveu:
Hello Arjan and *,
Am 2007-04-18 15:24:36, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would like to start a new sub-project called Debian4Business or perhaps
Debian-Office.I have a slight preference for the first name, but this is
Ter, 2007-04-24 às 16:44 +0200, Michelle Konzack escreveu:
Hello Arjan and *,
Am 2007-04-18 15:24:36, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would like to start a new sub-project called Debian4Business or perhaps
Debian-Office.I have a slight preference for the first name, but this is
cc'ing debian-custom so we can get off devel.
Qua, 2007-04-18 às 22:34 +0200, Andreas Tille escreveu:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Luis Matos wrote:
A cdd would be good for some first testing, but having it included in
debian would be great.
Argh - the usual missunderstanding: If you use
some options, (like debian-med) but that
wouldn't come in tasksel's options, like kde-desktop and xfce-desktop.
Qui, 2007-04-19 às 13:31 +0200, Andreas Tille escreveu:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Luis Matos wrote:
it true it's debian, but ... i meant in debian's main (general)
distribution
Frans Pop escreveu:
On Thursday 19 April 2007 14:46, Andreas Tille wrote:
IMHO the best solution would be if tasksel would have a two level
selection:
I doubt this is going to happen in the in tasksel. For one thing, its
maintainer has quite strong feelings against it.
For another
escreveu:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Luis Matos wrote:
At least, we could preseed some options, (like debian-med) but that
wouldn't come in tasksel's options, like kde-desktop and xfce-desktop.
IMHO the best solution would be if tasksel would have a two level
selection:
[x] Desktop environment
to work on it.
count with me.
If there are no major objections I will start to get things going.
Regards,
Arjan van Eersel
Dit bericht is verzonden via mijndomein.nl
best regards
Luis Matos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Sex, 2007-04-13 às 14:47 +0300, costin c escreveu:
May be some informations or tips about how to build a particular
package from maintainers/developers of that package could help new
maintainers who want to learn how to build/debug packages in
generally.
for taht you have:
- new maintainers
Please CC the debian-devel list.
Sex, 2007-04-13 às 18:26 +0300, costin c escreveu:
On 4/13/07, Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sex, 2007-04-13 às 14:47 +0300, costin c escreveu:
May be some informations or tips about how to build a particular
package from maintainers/developers
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 09:53 +0200, Josselin Mouette escreveu:
Le mercredi 11 avril 2007 à 23:20 +0100, Luis Matos a écrit :
Tasksel has no devel task.
There are no development environments for example: C/gtk, C#/GTK,
Java/Gtk, python/gtk pre-defined.
apt-get install gnome-devel
i
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 11:03 +0200, Reinhard Tartler escreveu:
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i don't mean all the debug and etc stuff... But the a beginner
environment for people to start to use and learn about linux
development.
I don't think beginner and developer belong in
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 10:58 +0200, Gabor Gombas escreveu:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:57:09AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
I don't think beginner and developer belong in the same sentence.
Yes they do. I met people who develop commercial software but who are
completely ignorant about any
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 09:37 -0300, André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira escreveu:
2007/4/12, Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 09:53 +0200, Josselin Mouette escreveu:
Le mercredi 11 avril 2007 à 23:20 +0100, Luis Matos a
écrit :
Tasksel has no devel
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 14:39 +0200, Josselin Mouette escreveu:
Le jeudi 12 avril 2007 à 14:25 +0100, Luis Matos a écrit :
gnome-devel has what? anjuta, devhelp, glade and ...
... and gnome-core-devel.
you killed me ... true, it has the -dev packages.
do you agree with the previous post about
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 20:40 +0200, Andrea Bolognani escreveu:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:27:25 +0200
Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 20:25:35 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
Still I don't see the advantage of having a complete development
environment on a live
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 21:03 +0200, Robert Millan escreveu:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:38:56AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
Why not lzma? It reduces size even more
It's the same question really. Do we want to move on from gz?
I guess bzip2 is more widely known than lzma, that is we're
Qua, 2007-04-11 às 17:33 +0200, Robert Millan escreveu:
I don't know what the critical mass of Linux users is that generates
interest for Linux among software vendors. We seem to be far from
it.
Yes, but Microsoft is much farther. I wouldn't be surprised if our
64-bit
userbase
Qua, 2007-04-11 às 13:12 -0400, Lennart Sorensen escreveu:
I can't stand visual studio. It drives me nuts. It makes it so hard
to
figure out what is going on and wants to get in the way of everything.
Give me plain simple makefiles and source code files I can edit
(preferably with vim) and
Qua, 2007-04-11 às 22:56 +0200, Michael Banck escreveu:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:01:09PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
Visual Studio makes the job for non-professional programmers a pretty
good job.
Please remember that this is debian-devel and not some general
discussion forum.
Please
versions.
best regards
Luis Matos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in
windows?
Ter, 2007-04-10 às 12:25 -0400, Matthias Julius escreveu:
Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Free cad implementations are too simple for use in some industrial
environments, when programs like CATIA or Solidorks, or inventor, Come
in Mind.
These programs are expensive
better to manage all users ...
seems to be that these 27 machines have only local users (i think ... )
cheers
-- vbi
--
Best Regards,
--
Luis Matos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
If you need more details about the installed Sarge machines that were
upgraded, please let me know.
Kindest regards,
Maarten
--
Maarten Verwijs
Debian Administrator
Netherlands Institute for Space Research (www.sron.nl)
--
Best Regards,
--
Luis Matos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
. Not to install directly on /var/www .
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Best Regards,
--
Luis Matos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
defaults is that no one forces you to use them.
The way that Debian 'defaults' /var/www with Apache and inconsistently
with Web applications isn't wanted usually by Webmasters. Though then
again, that's really an opinion. ;)
--
Best Regards,
--
Luis Matos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Sáb, 2007-01-06 às 12:01 +0100, Bernhard R. Link escreveu:
* Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070105 18:13]:
Such a gallery should at least include some notice about the copyright
owners and licenses of the parts it is composed from, best with also
links to the source packages used
Qui, 2007-01-04 às 20:22 -0500, Matthias Julius escreveu:
Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There could be another archive called updates.debian.org where
selected packages go in in coordination with the security and stable
release teams.
that would be nicier ... but that's a bit
Sex, 2007-01-05 às 14:13 +0100, Bernhard R. Link escreveu:
Such a gallery should at least include some notice about the copyright
owners and licenses of the parts it is composed from, best with also
links to the source packages used. (And the one operating that gallery
ask a lawyer if more is
Later back, some issues occored and i was told that CC was not, but a
new version was to come.
is it considered free now? the 2.5 or 1.0?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe in the /debian package, there could be a package.png that is the
screenshot and make them available in the mirrors (pool).
maybe creating a file such as Packages.gz or an extension to it,
informing that it has the screenshot available.
then the user could access the pool ... or ... use
Qui, 2007-01-04 às 11:10 +, Dominic Hargreaves escreveu:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 11:00:16AM +, Paul Waring wrote:
I think the problem that many people find with Debian is that they do
want the stability and security of stable, but at the same time they
don't want to be a dozen
Qui, 2007-01-04 às 16:43 -0500, Matthias Julius escreveu:
Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Qui, 2007-01-04 às 11:10 +, Dominic Hargreaves escreveu:
backports.org is, to my mind, a perfect solution to this problem; it
allows you to selectively upgrade your favourite/important
Qui, 2007-01-04 às 16:49 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez escreveu:
- Requiring a new package upload just for screenshots (If we want to
allow user contributed screenshots, the updates to the screenshots
really need to be able to happen independently of the package
uploads.
I think the
Sex, 2007-01-05 às 00:57 +0100, Daniel Baumann escreveu:
Luis Matos wrote:
backports use testing as base for the packages.
setting up security for backports is a bit easier than for testing. Lot
less packages.
My point is, for example, when the security team lauches a DSA, it
always
installed in 15 minutes.
i know the work that would be needed and probably the bugs that would
come up... another choice would be a new package of modules, with the
correspondent udeb for d-i.
Please, don't kill me because someone has to talk about this once in a
while.
--
Best Regards,
--
Luis
Qua, 2007-01-03 às 22:13 +0100, Daniel Baumann escreveu:
Luis Matos wrote:
What i am saying is: is it possible to in a lenny or lenny++ change the
way debian upgrades it's stable, just for the kernel?
both things are already solved unofficially. there are kernel backports
[0], and kenshi
Qua, 2007-01-03 às 22:28 +0100, Daniel Baumann escreveu:
Luis Matos wrote:
So, if we loose security and stability ... why use debian?
security and stability, that is excately what makes these backports
unofficial (more stability and bugs are an issue than security, though).
however
Sex, 2006-11-10 às 13:52 +0100, Josselin Mouette escreveu:
Le vendredi 10 novembre 2006 à 12:16 +0100, Holger Levsen a écrit :
last weekend I did a etch default debian install, in which gnome is the
default desktop environment. update-manager is installed as a part of it,
and
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:09, Joey Hess wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
So what do you people suggest in such cases:
1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ?
2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ?
3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll
this part for
gaming?).
just a funny note.
regards,
Luis Matos
_gass_ @ptnet
gass @ freenode
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
89 matches
Mail list logo
