JED anyone?
`jed' is an orphaned package. I'm considering to take its maintanence, since I've found JED is a small and quick start editor, good for quick editing of configuration files, etc. (I've wiped out all vis from my disk, and ae+ed do not satisfy me fully:-). However I'm no way an experienced JED user, so if anyone else wants to maintain it, I've nothing against it. Milan Zamazal -- Having GNU Emacs is like having a dragon's cave of treasures. Robert J. Chassell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JED anyone?
On 23 Jun 1998 17:20:09 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: `jed' is an orphaned package. I'm considering to take its maintanence, since I've found JED is a small and quick start editor, good for quick editing of configuration files, etc. (I've wiped out all vis from my disk, and ae+ed do not satisfy me fully:-). However I'm no way an experienced JED user, so if anyone else wants to maintain it, I've nothing against it. I'm in the same boat. My main editor is JOE and I use JED only on the rare occasion that I want context hightlighting when programming in Perl. I've given thought to maintaining it but not being a regular JED user I don't think I'd be the best qualified. -- Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus| employer's. They hired me for my ICQ: 5107343 | skills and labor, not my opinions! ---+- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JED anyone?
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 08:47:53AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: On 23 Jun 1998 17:20:09 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: `jed' is an orphaned package. I'm considering to take its maintanence, since I've found JED is a small and quick start editor, good for quick editing of configuration files, etc. (I've wiped out all vis from my disk, and ae+ed do not satisfy me fully:-). However I'm no way an experienced JED user, so if anyone else wants to maintain it, I've nothing against it. I'm in the same boat. My main editor is JOE and I use JED only on the rare occasion that I want context hightlighting when programming in Perl. I've given thought to maintaining it but not being a regular JED user I don't think I'd be the best qualified. I've been thinking about taking over maintenance too as the upstream version is a fair bit ahead. OTOH I havn't been doing much maintaining recently and I'd like to finish doing SOCKSv5 and a few new upstream releases of other packages first. One thing I've noticed is that the debian diff includes the compiled packages, these should be generated my the build process and not be in the diff. Adrian email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. PGP key available on public key servers Debian Linux http://www.debian.org The superior Linux distribution -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JED anyone?
Milan Zamazal writes: `jed' is an orphaned package. I'm considering to take its maintanence, since I've found JED is a small and quick start editor, good for quick editing of configuration files, etc. (I've wiped out all vis from my disk, and ae+ed do not satisfy me fully:-). However I'm no way an experienced JED user, so if anyone else wants to maintain it, I've nothing against it. Well, it seems I now use it the same as you do, but it used some time ago to be the only useful editor I had (on a 386SX-16 box), and I hacked some slang files for its purpose. I think I could take it over for slink, but I remember someone recently saying there was already work in progress on this. Don't remember who it was - just hope he'll read this thread. OTOH, I've also several other plans for early slink, so someone else with less plans than me could have a try a jed... -- Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Stop making M$-Bill richer richer, isp-email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | support Debian GNU/Linux: debian-email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | more powerful, more stable ! http://www.mygale.org/~ydirson/ | Check http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JED anyone?
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 05:20:09PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: `jed' is an orphaned package. I'm considering to take its maintanence, since I've found JED is a small and quick start editor, good for quick editing of configuration files, etc. (I've wiped out all vis from my disk, and ae+ed do not satisfy me fully:-). However I'm no way an experienced JED user, so if anyone else wants to maintain it, I've nothing against it. I use jed for programming, and joe for other tasks. Jed is very nice, but it would be better still if someone could figure out its weird C++ autoindent problems (bug#15197). It's a pretty cool bug, actually. I certainly have no time to maintain the package. I say go for it! Have fun, Avery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
