Lars Wirzenius writes:
I guess I'm repeating myself, but oh well. In my opinion, the main Debian
distribution (i.e., not including non-free or contrib) should consist only
of free software, where the definition of free includes the requirement
that source code is available and that the program
On Mon, 12 Aug 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:
I'd like to ask the other developers what they think. While I see th elogic
behind your approach I still think LyX should be an official part of Debian.
Me too. However, I think that the way to accomplish that is to persuade
the XForms authors to
Hi,
Michael Meskes wrote:
I'd like to ask the other developers what they think. While I see th elogic
behind your approach I still think LyX should be an official part of Debian.
What happens if I recompile it statically? Would it go into the standard
tree then?
Being a Debian/m68k user,
Michael Meskes wrote:
Ian Jackson writes:
No, because packages which depend on contrib packages must go in
contrib too.
Hmm, that wasn't what was said a while ago when we moved xforms.
I'd like to ask the other developers what they think. While I see th elogic
behind your approach I
Michael Meskes:
I'd like to ask the other developers what they think.
I guess I'm repeating myself, but oh well. In my opinion, the main Debian
distribution (i.e., not including non-free or contrib) should consist only
of free software, where the definition of free includes the requirement
that
Package: lyx, ftp.debian.org
Version: 0.9.28-1
This package depends on a non-free package (xforms).
It should be in contrib, not in the distribution proper.
Ian.
Subject: Bug#4078: lynx should be in `contrib'
Package: lyx, ftp.debian.org
I assume that the subject is wrong? (Actually, I know it is, but I'm not
sure if it matters for the bug system.)
--
Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iki.fi/liw/
Please don't Cc: me when replying to my
7 matches
Mail list logo
