In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
to do.
2. nameif has issues when using /etc/mactab. I can't remember the exact
problems as I can't access that machine right now, but I couldn't get
nameif to work that way.
you should not try to assign ethX because of the not-temp-rename problem.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:38:31PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
to do.
2. nameif has issues when using /etc/mactab. I can't remember the exact
problems as I can't access that machine right now, but I couldn't get
nameif to work that way.
you
On Dec 19, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some reason we should be unable to provide a smooth upgrade path
for users of sarge? Having your network devices scramble themselves on
reboot is a Big Deal, whether or not it's in the release notes.
This often happens anyway when
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 06:40:53AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
We could enhance the ifup interfaces file format to use MACs as interface
identifiers and have an additional labeling statement. (i know it can be
done with other means right now but I think it sould be introduced as first
class
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
use nameif.
This has been suggested before but AIUI nameif has problems/limitations
renaming eth0.
Well, you just cant use existing names (this could be fixed, however i am
not sure if this is needed)
It
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 19, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some reason we should be unable to provide a smooth upgrade path
for users of sarge? Having your network devices scramble themselves on
reboot is a Big Deal, whether or not it's in the release
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:13:01AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 19, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some reason we should be unable to provide a smooth upgrade path
for users of sarge? Having your network devices scramble themselves on
reboot is a Big Deal, whether
On Dec 18, Darren Salt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An alternative appears to be to process events in series... or maybe delaying
This was the precedent approach, and it's much slower (also, it cannot
be implemented anymore with just udevd).
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Saturday 17 December 2005 09.30, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 17, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is currently very likely that systems with two network interfaces
will end up with both switched on the installed system after the
reboot. This is of course a blocker.
This
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I hope this will be solved soon!
use nameif.
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 18 December 2005 15:34, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I hope this will be solved soon!
use nameif.
This has been suggested before but AIUI nameif has problems/limitations
renaming eth0.
The correct solution seems to be to use udev rewriting rules
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:52:42AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 18, Darren Salt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An alternative appears to be to process events in series... or maybe
delaying
This was the precedent approach, and it's much slower (also, it cannot
be implemented anymore with
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:14:19PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 18 December 2005 15:34, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I hope this will be solved soon!
use nameif.
This has been suggested before but AIUI nameif has problems/limitations
renaming
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
use nameif.
This has been suggested before but AIUI nameif has problems/limitations
renaming eth0.
Well, you just cant use existing names (this could be fixed, however i am
not sure if this is needed)
I am currently not sure which limitation that is
On Dec 17, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is currently very likely that systems with two network interfaces
will end up with both switched on the installed system after the
reboot. This is of course a blocker.
The discussion showed that sticking with discover while udev is
[CC'ing hotplug-devel]
I demand that Marco d'Itri may or may not have written...
On Dec 17, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is currently very likely that systems with two network interfaces will
end up with both switched on the installed system after the reboot. This
is of
(reply-to: debian-boot)
The eigth Debian Installer team meeting was held from 21:00UTC to 22:24UTC
on Wednesday December 14th 2005.
There were about 80 people connected to the channel during the meeting
and 17 of them spoke during the meeting at least once.
The full log of the meeting is
17 matches
Mail list logo
