Hi everybody,
In #704805, there is a disagreement between the maintainer of R software
and several other people (me included).
R software is packaged into a lots of different Debian packages (with
different maintainers) along with the main R package (r-base-core).
Due to internal changes,
On 2014-04-05, Vincent Danjean vdanjean...@free.fr wrote:
The maintainer think that he does not need to do anything about
that. People should just upgrade all their packages from stable to
testing when r-base-core is upgraded.
Other people (and me) disagree and think that other broken
Hi,
The maintainer think that he does not need to do anything about
that. People should just upgrade all their packages from stable to
testing when r-base-core is upgraded.
Other people (and me) disagree and think that other broken r-related
packages must be either removed or upgraded
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 07:40:49PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2014-04-05, Vincent Danjean vdanjean...@free.fr wrote:
The maintainer think that he does not need to do anything about
that. People should just upgrade all their packages from stable to
testing when r-base-core is upgraded.
Hi Dirk, Charles and everybody!
I was going to share my current and very positive experience with Qt5
providing a virtual package as Charles suggest, but looking further in the bug
log I see that at least Scott and Don have already done so with other
examples.
So just allow me Dirk to tell
5 matches
Mail list logo