On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:31:14AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
You should be installing the linux-source-x.x.x package instead and
using make-kpkg to build custom kernels. The source package (rather
than the linux-source-x.x.x binary package) is not meant to make custom
kernels.
Ideally
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I think the only solution currently is to install that package and
get the configuration from /boot/config-version.
Or just go to http://merkel.debian.org/~jurij/ and download them.
Don Armstrong
--
One day I put instant coffee in my microwave
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13/06/2008):
Ideally the .config files used to build the standard Debian kernels
would be available in a light-weight package. I think the only
solution currently is to install that package and get the
configuration from /boot/config-version.
You may play
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13/06/2008):
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13/06/2008):
Ideally the .config files used to build the standard Debian kernels
would be available in a light-weight package. I think the only
solution currently is to install that package and get the
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:35:28PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 05:23:19PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 08:31:47PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
My problem with make-kpkg has always been that I could never rely on its
generated -headers
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:35:28PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 05:23:19PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 08:31:47PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
My problem with make-kpkg has always been that I could never rely on its
generated -headers
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 11:52:47AM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:35:28PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 05:23:19PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 08:31:47PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
My problem with make-kpkg has
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 22:31:09 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:14:09PM +0200, Mauro Ziliani wrote:
Hi all.
I need to rebuild only the linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 deb package from
source code.
How can I do that without rebuild all packages in
Hi Marc,
On Saturday 07 June 2008 11:51, Marc Haber wrote:
Shouldn't that be easier to do,
Send patches?! ;)
and - most of all - documented?
http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage
regards,
Holger
pgprFz3NRVvRf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:51:04AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Shouldn't that be easier to do, and - most of all - documented?
Playing with source packages isn't normal. It used to be much worse
(2.6.8 in sarge involved building multiple packages, one which depended
on the other). The package is
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:31:14AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:51:04AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Shouldn't that be easier to do, and - most of all - documented?
Playing with source packages isn't normal. It used to be much worse
(2.6.8 in sarge involved
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 08:31:47PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
My problem with make-kpkg has always been that I could never rely on its
generated -headers packages to actually work.
Odd, the headers it generated allways worked for me.
So it was fine to build a kernel. But if I wanted to build
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 05:23:19PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 08:31:47PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
My problem with make-kpkg has always been that I could never rely on its
generated -headers packages to actually work.
Odd, the headers it generated allways
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:35:28PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Taken to another system?
I don't remember if I did or not.
The problems I remember:
1. the source and build links pointed to an incorrect place. An
invalid build link is a problem.
Where do they point?
2. If I actually
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 14:53:03 +0200, Holger Levsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 07 June 2008 11:51, Marc Haber wrote:
Shouldn't that be easier to do,
Send patches?! ;)
Since I pay more attention to my personal and mental health, I tend to
minimize my contact to the Debian Kernel Team.
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 11:31:14 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:51:04AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Shouldn't that be easier to do, and - most of all - documented?
Playing with source packages isn't normal.
The package is designed to make the life of the
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:41:01AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
I find that attitute totally unacceptable.
Well it looks that way to me. In fact I would say that is true of ever
source package. The goal is to make the maintainers job easy, since
they are the ones that deal with the source package.
Hi all.
I need to rebuild only the linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 deb package from
source code.
How can I do that without rebuild all packages in linux-2.6.18 sources
(xen, k7,vserver)?
Thanks a lot
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:14:09PM +0200, Mauro Ziliani wrote:
Hi all.
I need to rebuild only the linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 deb package from
source code.
How can I do that without rebuild all packages in linux-2.6.18 sources
(xen, k7,vserver)?
Remove the other ones from
19 matches
Mail list logo
