Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-12 Thread Mark Pearson
On 12/12/2020 05:48, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 11 décembre 2020 20:36 -05, Mark Pearson: > > You need to use "~rc" instead of "-rc", otherwise, users won't be able > to upgrade to "1.6" when they have "1.6-rc3" installed. > Ooops - my bad. I started wearing glasses this year...but don't always

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-12 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 11 décembre 2020 20:36 -05, Mark Pearson: >> They seem to say future releases will be tagged. So, I think you should >> use in gbp.conf: >> >> upstream-tag = v%(version%~%-)s >> pristine-tar = False >> >> No need for upstream-branch since you won't use "gbp import-orig" as the >> origin

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-11 Thread Mark Pearson
Thanks Vincent On 11/12/2020 14:22, Vincent Bernat wrote: > owner 960788 markpear...@lenovo.com > quit > > ❦ 11 décembre 2020 12:15 -05, Mark Pearson: > >>> >>> This should do the trick. You may want to tag the upstream commit >>> yourself with upstream/1.6 if you upstream is not consistent

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-11 Thread Vincent Bernat
owner 960788 markpear...@lenovo.com quit ❦ 11 décembre 2020 12:15 -05, Mark Pearson: >>> I did have to comment out "overlay = True" in the gbp.conf - it gave me >>> an error that I'll have to dig into. >> >> That's because you went for the first "classic" solution. I was pushing >> for the

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-11 Thread Mark Pearson
Hi Vincent On 10/12/2020 13:53, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 10 décembre 2020 12:57 -05, Mark Pearson: > >> I did have to comment out "overlay = True" in the gbp.conf - it gave me >> an error that I'll have to dig into. > > That's because you went for the first "classic" solution. I was pushing >

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-10 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 10 décembre 2020 12:57 -05, Mark Pearson: > I did have to comment out "overlay = True" in the gbp.conf - it gave me > an error that I'll have to dig into. That's because you went for the first "classic" solution. I was pushing for the overlay solution as the upstream git repository is pushing

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-10 Thread Mark Pearson
So a big thank you to all who responded with suggestions and advice. Particularly thanks to Stephan Lachnit and Vincent Bernat for providing fixes and improvements directly to my first attempt. I've taken most of what they gave (not all - some pieces still in progress) and have a second attempt

Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-09 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
My Dell Inspiron 7591 2n1 required the SOF audio firmware, so I did a quick packaging for my own purposes, to be sure I had the latest. See https://github.com/barak/sof-bin branch: debian Works for me, and of course my packaging scripts are free for use in whole or in part etc (I hereby place

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-08 Thread Mark Pearson
Hi Paul, On 08/12/2020 21:16, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:04 PM Mark Pearson wrote: > >> From my point of view (admittedly limited) there is limited benefit to >> building your own unsigned firmware as it won't load on our systems. > > According the discussion I had with Lenovo

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:04 PM Mark Pearson wrote: > From my point of view (admittedly limited) there is limited benefit to > building your own unsigned firmware as it won't load on our systems. According the discussion I had with Lenovo and Intel folks, Intel Baytrail/Cherrytrail/Broadwell

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-08 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, El dt., 8 de des. 2020, 16:04, Mark Pearson va escriure: > > I studied the different options time ago, Fedora ships it's own > > separate package, Ubuntu merges it into firmware-linux-nonfree, > > firmware could also be built but dependencies would be hard to > > package/maintain - as I

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-08 Thread Mark Pearson
On 08/12/2020 04:43, Hector Oron wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:47, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> >> Quoting Mark Pearson (2020-12-08 04:18:20) >>> On 07/12/2020 21:19, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Mark Pearson wrote: > I'd like to solve the lack of

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-08 Thread John Scott
> firmware could also be built but dependencies would be hard to > package/maintain - as I understood - those need a forked xtensa > compiler. I'm adopting the firmware-ath9k-htc package at the moment, which also uses a forked xtensa compiler and is built from source. Rather than package the

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-08 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:47, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Mark Pearson (2020-12-08 04:18:20) > > On 07/12/2020 21:19, Paul Wise wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Mark Pearson wrote: > > > > > >> I'd like to solve the lack of Intel SOF audio firmware > > > > > > IIRC the

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Mark Pearson (2020-12-08 04:18:20) > On 07/12/2020 21:19, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Mark Pearson wrote: > > > >> I'd like to solve the lack of Intel SOF audio firmware > > > > IIRC the Debian kernel team were planning on adding those to the > >

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-07 Thread Mark Pearson
Thanks Paul, On 07/12/2020 21:19, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Mark Pearson wrote: > >> I'd like to solve the lack of Intel SOF audio firmware > > IIRC the Debian kernel team were planning on adding those to the > linux-firmware.git packaging. > If that is happening that

Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Mark Pearson wrote: > I'd like to solve the lack of Intel SOF audio firmware IIRC the Debian kernel team were planning on adding those to the linux-firmware.git packaging. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-07 Thread Mark Pearson
Thanks Vincent, On 07/12/2020 09:03, Vincent Bernat wrote: ❦ 7 décembre 2020 08:57 -05, Mark Pearson: I'd like to solve the lack of Intel SOF audio firmware & topology files being available on Debian - I know it's impacting a lot of users on some of the newer Thinkpads. I figured I should

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-07 Thread Mark Pearson
On 07/12/2020 11:13, Jonathan Carter wrote: On 2020/12/07 18:07, Mark Pearson wrote: I pushed what I have to https://salsa.debian.org/mpearson/sof-bin-packaging It's pretty basic :) Seems like you haven't committed go.sh? (and hopefully more files?) -Jonathan They're all in the

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-07 Thread Jonathan Carter
On 2020/12/07 18:07, Mark Pearson wrote: > I pushed what I have to https://salsa.debian.org/mpearson/sof-bin-packaging > > It's pretty basic :) Seems like you haven't committed go.sh? (and hopefully more files?) -Jonathan -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-07 Thread Mark Pearson
Thanks Jonathan, On 07/12/2020 10:15, Jonathan Carter wrote: Hi Mark On 2020/12/07 15:57, Mark Pearson wrote: I did a bit of reading this weekend, and started the process. Having created appropriate files under a debian sub-dir, and messed around a bit, now when running 'debuild -us -uc' from

Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-07 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hi Mark On 2020/12/07 15:57, Mark Pearson wrote: > I did a bit of reading this weekend, and started the process. Having > created appropriate files under a debian sub-dir, and messed around a > bit, now when running 'debuild -us -uc' from the 1.6 cloned branch of > the sof-bin git repo I end up

Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-07 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 7 décembre 2020 08:57 -05, Mark Pearson: > I'd like to solve the lack of Intel SOF audio firmware & topology > files being available on Debian - I know it's impacting a lot of users > on some of the newer Thinkpads. I figured I should have a stab at this > exercise myself and see what

Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

2020-12-07 Thread Mark Pearson
Hi Debian, I'd like to solve the lack of Intel SOF audio firmware & topology files being available on Debian - I know it's impacting a lot of users on some of the newer Thinkpads. I figured I should have a stab at this exercise myself and see what happens. I did a bit of reading this