On Saturday 09 August 2014 18:46:09 Steve Langasek wrote:
[snip]
Which according to elsewhere in my mailbox, you've dealt with by uploading a
10-day delayed NMU. This is unacceptable. The NMU process always requires
that you send your NMU diff to the BTS for review by the maintainer
Am 10.08.2014 um 15:25 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
Interesting, because yesterday I've got a patch [0] (cool, thanks a lot!) but
stating that the package has been NMUed and uploaded to delayed/5. So, even 5
less days than in your case.
Less than 5 minutes later, the
Hi,
2014-08-10 14:25 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
On Saturday 09 August 2014 18:46:09 Steve Langasek wrote:
[snip]
Which according to elsewhere in my mailbox, you've dealt with by uploading a
10-day delayed NMU. This is unacceptable. The NMU process always requires
that you send your
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 15:52:51 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I wasn't aware that we are still supposed to do delayed/10 uploads, now that
the
default priority for uploads is medium.
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-guidelines
recommends:
* Upload fixing
On Sunday 10 August 2014 15:52:51 Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 10.08.2014 um 15:25 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
Interesting, because yesterday I've got a patch [0] (cool, thanks a lot!)
but stating that the package has been NMUed and uploaded to delayed/5.
So, even 5 less days
5 matches
Mail list logo
