On Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
There's no requirement for md5sums files in the first place AFAIK.
for reference, this is #572571.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
2013/1/15 Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de:
On 2013-01-15 10:29, Julien Cristau wrote:
There's no requirement for md5sums files in the first place AFAIK. How
are incomplete md5sums worse than no md5sums? If anything this stuff
should be minor IMO.
If a package is shipping no .md5sum at
[Holger Levsen]
Hi Andreas,
On Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
the following packages from wheezy ship files that are excluded from
the .md5sums file:
gridsite: FILE WITHOUT MD5SUM /var/lib/gridsite/.gacl
gridsite: FILE WITHOUT MD5SUM
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 13:10:24 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
this I'd probably file as serious, not having checksums for files in /usr
seems worse. But then, the same reasoning as for the above bugs applies, so
maybe important is better after all.
There's no requirement for md5sums files
On 2013-01-15 10:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
There's no requirement for md5sums files in the first place AFAIK. How
are incomplete md5sums worse than no md5sums?
If there is no md5sums file, dpkg (as of version 1.16.3) creates it at
unpack time.
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 2013-01-15 10:29, Julien Cristau wrote:
There's no requirement for md5sums files in the first place AFAIK. How
are incomplete md5sums worse than no md5sums? If anything this stuff
should be minor IMO.
If a package is shipping no .md5sum at all, it will be created by dpkg
at installation
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:19:36 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I'm pretty sure modifying *any* shipped files in the maintainer scripts
should be forbidden, although I didn't find a policy reference for this
(this is made explicit for conffiles, what about normal files?).
Packages violating
* Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de [130115 11:20]:
On 2013-01-15 10:29, Julien Cristau wrote:
There's no requirement for md5sums files in the first place AFAIK. How
are incomplete md5sums worse than no md5sums? If anything this stuff
should be minor IMO.
If a package is shipping no
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:46:46 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-01-15 10:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
There's no requirement for md5sums files in the first place AFAIK. How
are incomplete md5sums worse than no md5sums?
If there is no md5sums file, dpkg (as of version 1.16.3)
Hi Andreas,
On Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
the following packages from wheezy ship files that are excluded from
the .md5sums file:
gridsite: FILE WITHOUT MD5SUM /var/lib/gridsite/.gacl
gridsite: FILE WITHOUT MD5SUM /var/lib/gridsite/gridsitefoot.txt
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:13:46PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Excluding shipped files from .md5sums looks seriously wrong for files
in /usr and at least questionable in /var/lib.
What is so serious about that? Please no more rc
On Jan 14, 2013 12:10 PM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
the following packages from wheezy ship files that are excluded from
the .md5sums file:
[snip]
rkhunter: FILE WITHOUT MD5SUM
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:13:46PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Excluding shipped files from .md5sums looks seriously wrong for files
in /usr and at least questionable in /var/lib.
What is so serious about that?
In itself it may
Hi,
the following packages from wheezy ship files that are excluded from
the .md5sums file:
gridsite: FILE WITHOUT MD5SUM /var/lib/gridsite/.gacl
gridsite: FILE WITHOUT MD5SUM /var/lib/gridsite/gridsitefoot.txt
gridsite: FILE WITHOUT MD5SUM /var/lib/gridsite/gridsitehead.txt
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Excluding shipped files from .md5sums looks seriously wrong for files
in /usr and at least questionable in /var/lib.
What is so serious about that? Please no more rc mbf's.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
15 matches
Mail list logo
