On Sun 16 Dec 2012 02:58:36 Petter Reinholdtsen escribió:
[Ian Jackson]
There is still nothing per se wrong with circular dependencies
[Thorsten Glaser]
Actually, I’m hitting an APT bug during dist-upgrades right now for
packages with circular dependencies, usually two (perl with
[Ian Jackson]
There is still nothing per se wrong with circular dependencies
[Thorsten Glaser]
Actually, I’m hitting an APT bug during dist-upgrades right now for
packages with circular dependencies, usually two (perl with
perl-modules, and g++-$version with its library), when they are
Ian Jackson dixit:
There is still nothing per se wrong with circular dependencies
Actually, I’m hitting an APT bug during dist-upgrades right now
for packages with circular dependencies, usually two (perl with
perl-modules, and g++-$version with its library), when they are
indirectly depended on
Bill Allombert writes (Status of circular dependencies in Sid):
Today circular dependencies in unstable reached an all-time low, with
only 36 circular dependencies.
There is still nothing per se wrong with circular dependencies and
there are situations where a circular dependency is the right
Le jeudi 06 septembre 2012 à 13:10 +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit :
There is still nothing per se wrong with circular dependencies and
there are situations where a circular dependency is the right answer.
I have yet to see one such situation.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'
`-
Hello Debian developers,
Today circular dependencies in unstable reached an all-time low, with
only 36 circular dependencies.
Here the lists of circular dependencies followed by the list of packages listed
by maintainers.
This list is also available at
Hello Debian developers,
Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
maintainers.
This list is also available at
http://debian.semistable.com/unstable_developers.txt
(updated daily, courtesy of Robert Lemmen).
A list of dependencies including dependency graphs is
7 matches
Mail list logo
