On 23 September 2014 17:58, Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch wrote:
Isn't that an implementation detail? Is Python version relevant for the
on-the-wire WSGI protocol?
WSGI is an API, not a wire protocol. The Python version of the WSGI
server would also be the Python version the code is run
On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch wrote:
As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd
virtual package should be provided by the apache2 package, not the
apache2-bin package, because the apache2-bin package doesn't provide a
working webserver. Bug
Quoting Brian May (2014-09-23 08:02:22)
On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers [1]jer...@dekkers.ch wrote:
As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd
virtual package should be provided by the apache2 package, not the
apache2-bin package, because
At Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:51:56 +0200,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Brian May (2014-09-23 08:02:22)
On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers [1]jer...@dekkers.ch wrote:
As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd
virtual package should be provided by
Quoting Brian May (2014-07-30 02:54:10)
On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers [1]jer...@dekkers.ch wrote:
As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd
virtual package should be provided by the apache2 package, not the
apache2-bin package, because the
[ ⏰ 29/07/2014 07:55 ] [ ✎ Wouter Verhelst ]
Op dinsdag 29 juli 2014 10:51:45 schreef Brian May:
So ideally I only want to depend on libapache2-mod-wsgi if apache2 is
installed, but this is not possible.
Sure it is.
Depends: apache2 | libapache2-mod-wsgi, apache2 | httpd
is perfectly
On 29 July 2014 16:02, Jean-Christophe Dubacq jcduba...@free.fr wrote:
You surely meant httpd |libapache2-mod-wsgi, apache2 | httpd .
Not convinced that will work.
e.g. if apache-bin is already installed, that will satisfy the httpd
dependency, so it won't look at libapache2-mod-wsgi.
--
Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
[ ⏰ 29/07/2014 07:55 ] [ ✎ Wouter Verhelst ]
Op dinsdag 29 juli 2014 10:51:45 schreef Brian May:
So ideally I only want to depend on libapache2-mod-wsgi if apache2 is
installed, but this is not possible.
Sure it is.
Depends: apache2 | libapache2-mod-wsgi,
Op dinsdag 29 juli 2014 08:02:43 schreef Jean-Christophe Dubacq:
[ ⏰ 29/07/2014 07:55 ] [ ✎ Wouter Verhelst ]
Op dinsdag 29 juli 2014 10:51:45 schreef Brian May:
So ideally I only want to depend on libapache2-mod-wsgi if apache2 is
installed, but this is not possible.
Sure it is.
On 29 Jul 2014 16:44, Wouter Verhelst w...@uter.be wrote:
No, I don't.
What brian really wants is apache2 or apache2-bin. In the case of
apache2-bin, he needs an additional dependency on libapache2-mod-wsgi.
Really, it should be
apache2 | libapache2-mod-wsgi, apache2 | apache2-bin
to do
Brian May wrote:
* apache2-reverse-dependency-calls-invoke-rc.d - due to legacy fall back
code that restarts Apache2.2 automatically.
Yeah, I'm overriding this one too.
* non-standard-apache2-configuration-name - due to the fact I need to
supply different configuration files for apache2.2 and
On 29 July 2014 18:42, Thorsten Glaser t...@debian.org wrote:
No. Use IfVersion in one shared config file.
At least that's what I've been told, and what makes sense to me.
I wasn't aware of IfVersion. Thanks for the tip.
--
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au
At Tue, 29 Jul 2014 17:29:46 +1000,
Brian May wrote:
On 29 Jul 2014 16:44, Wouter Verhelst w...@uter.be wrote:
No, I don't.
What brian really wants is apache2 or apache2-bin. In the case of
apache2-bin, he needs an additional dependency on libapache2-mod-wsgi.
Really, it should be
On 29 July 2014 09:40, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote:
if [ -e /usr/share/apache2/apache2-maintscript-helper ] ; then
. /usr/share/apache2/apache2-maintscript-helper
apache2_invoke enconf package.conf
elif dpkg-query -f '${Version}' -W 'apache2.2-common' /dev/null
On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch wrote:
As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd
virtual package should be provided by the apache2 package, not the
apache2-bin package, because the apache2-bin package doesn't provide a
working webserver. Bug
Hello,
Just noticed some issues with my web application package, and not sure what
to do about them, or who to contact. Apologies if these issues have already
been discussed, the other threads seem to focus around upgrading binary
modules (at quick glance).
First, my package triggered the
On 29 July 2014 09:40, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote:
Fair enough, change that depends to depends on apache2 | httpd.
However, now when I install it, for reasons I don't understand, apt-get
prefers to install apache2-bin over apache2 (thought it should default to
the first
Op dinsdag 29 juli 2014 10:51:45 schreef Brian May:
So ideally I only want to depend on libapache2-mod-wsgi if apache2 is
installed, but this is not possible.
Sure it is.
Depends: apache2 | libapache2-mod-wsgi, apache2 | httpd
is perfectly legal and will do what you want.
--
It is easy to
18 matches
Mail list logo