assuming for a second that you are not trolling,
On 2014-02-28 12:56, Solal Rastier wrote:
Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
hmm.
but since both contrib and non-free are not part of Debian, how does
the existence of these sections lead to the conclusion that Debian is
Le 3 mars 2014 à 13:59, forum::für::umläute zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at a écrit :
assuming for a second that you are not trolling,
On 2014-02-28 12:56, Solal Rastier wrote:
Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
hmm.
but since both contrib and non-free are not part of
On 2014-03-03 14:16, Solal Rastier wrote:
The installer recommend contrib and nonfree...
so what are the consequences? does it force you to follow the
recommendations?
btw, i never noticed that the installer recommends contrib or
nonfree. afair, i had to enable them manually.
fgadmf
IOhannes
On 2014-03-03 14:56, forum::für::umläute wrote:
On 2014-03-03 14:16, Solal Rastier wrote:
The installer recommend contrib and nonfree...
so what are the consequences? does it force you to follow the
recommendations?
this sounds a bit snarky, but is not (really) intended to do so.
the point
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 02:16:37PM +0100, Solal Rastier wrote:
The installer recommend contrib and nonfree...
No, it does not.
--
This end should point toward the ground if you want to go to space.
If it starts pointing toward space you are having a bad problem and you
will not go to space
Hello,
El 28/02/2014 11:36, Solal Rastier solal.rast...@me.com escribió:
Why the nonfree and contrib distributions aren't removed?
The reply was given at this thread.
There are people that think like you (if you think that should be removed).
See gnewsense [1], maybe you prefer that distro than
Why the nonfree and contrib distributions aren't removed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/db2f0f4e-6f63-4246-a1cd-7a509f378...@me.com
Hello,
On 28 February 2014 10:35, Solal Rastier solal.rast...@me.com wrote:
Why the nonfree and contrib distributions aren't removed?
Could you please elaborate your question?
--
Cheers,
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Le vendredi 28 février 2014 à 10:35 +0100, Solal Rastier a écrit :
Why the nonfree and contrib distributions aren't removed?
Maybe because of
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=firmware-nonfree
or
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=flashplugin-nonfree
Cheers,
--
.''`.
* Solal Rastier solal.rast...@me.com, 2014-02-28, 10:35:
Why the nonfree and contrib distributions aren't removed?
https://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_002
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Op vrijdag 28 februari 2014 10:35:15 schreef Solal Rastier:
Why the nonfree and contrib distributions aren't removed?
Because unfortunately the free software foundation believes documentation
doesn't need to be free, and we can't put non-free documentation in main.
--
This end should point
Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 12:46, Wouter Verhelst w...@uter.be a écrit :
Op vrijdag 28 februari 2014 12:42:39 schreef u:
The FSF believe documentation need to be free, and that's true...
It is true that it needs to be free, but their license just
Le 28/02/2014 12:56, Solal Rastier a écrit :
Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
I applause this almost inconspicuous troll attempt.
Please don't top-post.
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
Regards.
PS: full stop.
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 12:46, Wouter Verhelst w...@uter.be
In data venerdì 28 febbraio 2014 10.35.15, Solal Rastier ha scritto:
Why the nonfree and contrib distributions aren't removed?
don't feed the troll please
--
Salvo Tomaselli
Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che
1. I'm not a troll
2. What is top-post?
3. Why I need stop?
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 13:10, Thibaut Paumard thib...@debian.org a écrit :
Le 28/02/2014 12:56, Solal Rastier a écrit :
Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
I applause this almost inconspicuous troll attempt.
Please
That's not an answer. For users, that doesn't change anything.
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 15:20, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org a écrit :
Solal Rastier, le Fri 28 Feb 2014 12:56:00 +0100, a écrit :
Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
contrib and non-free are not part of
I not compare Debian with Windows. The FSF publishes a GNU/Linux freedom
indicator. Debian is proprietary, sorry.
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 18:24, Octavio Alvarez alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org a écrit :
On 02/28/2014 05:18 AM, Solal Rastier wrote:
1. I'm not a troll
2. What is top-post?
3. Why I need
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 19:22, Octavio Alvarez alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org a écrit :
On 02/28/2014 09:29 AM, Solal Rastier wrote:
I not compare Debian with Windows. The FSF publishes a GNU/Linux freedom
indicator. Debian is proprietary, sorry.
Ah! The FSF website [1] says otherwise. The FSF
Hi Solal,
2014-02-28 19:24 GMT+01:00 Solal Rastier solal.rast...@me.com:
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 19:22, Octavio Alvarez alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org a écrit
:
On 02/28/2014 09:29 AM, Solal Rastier wrote:
My mail client top-posting automtically. I don't compare Windows and Debian.
Windows is
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:21:13 +0100
Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Hi Solal,
2014-02-28 19:24 GMT+01:00 Solal Rastier solal.rast...@me.com:
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 19:22, Octavio Alvarez alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org a
écrit :
On 02/28/2014 09:29 AM, Solal Rastier wrote:
My
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Solal Rastier solal.rast...@me.com wrote:
That's not an answer. For users, that doesn't change anything.
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 15:20, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org a écrit :
Solal Rastier, le Fri 28 Feb 2014 12:56:00 +0100, a écrit :
Further proof that
21 matches
Mail list logo
