Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project (was: debian github organization ?)

On Apr 22, 2015, at 01:25 PM, Ben Finney wrote: >Rather, this is the Debian project considering our own instance of a >first-class Git hosting platform. I guess this would mean being able to use the Debian GitLab instance for package development, rather than say Alioth? For straight-up hosting o

Re: debian github organization ?

Ben Caradoc-Davies writes: > On 19/07/15 23:36, Florian Weimer wrote: >> The single account policy means that users >> would have to share authentication information across different roles, >> which may not be acceptable. > > I am not sure why this would be unacceptable to anyone. Authentication

Re: debian github organization ?

Ben Caradoc-Davies writes: > The problem with per-role accounts is the loss of connection and > reputation on loss of account. The growth of social media and social > coding is changing the workplace. No longer is a role associated with a > job. Rather, reputation and authority follow individuals

Re: debian github organization ?

On 20/07/15 14:50, Russ Allbery wrote: Er, you're responding to Ian as if you've never before heard of the concept of using separate authentication credentials for different purposes, but this is a very old and respected technique and a standard security approach. It's a form of privilege separa

Re: debian github organization ?

Ben Caradoc-Davies writes: > On 20/07/15 12:18, Ian Jackson wrote: >> You're talking as if what is identified is a human being. But of >> course, it isn't. When you do a git push (or whatever) what is pushed >> is controlled by the computer you are using. > Of course. Humans lack a network int

Re: debian github organization ?

On 20/07/15 12:18, Ian Jackson wrote: Ben Caradoc-Davies writes ("Re: debian github organization ?"): I am not sure why this would be unacceptable to anyone. Authentication is your ability to prove who you are. GitHub accounts provide this. You're talking as if what is identi

Re: debian github organization ?

Ben Caradoc-Davies writes ("Re: debian github organization ?"): > On 19/07/15 23:36, Florian Weimer wrote: > > The single account policy means that users > > would have to share authentication information across different roles, > > which may not be acceptable. >

Re: debian github organization ?

On 19/07/15 23:36, Florian Weimer wrote: The single account policy means that users would have to share authentication information across different roles, which may not be acceptable. I am not sure why this would be unacceptable to anyone. Authentication is your ability to prove who you are. G

Re: debian github organization ?

On 19/07/15 21:52, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jérémy Lal: i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where maintainers could be added. Github has a single-account-per-person policy (unless you pay, I think), so for those of us with multiple affiliations, it is difficult to

Re: debian github organization ?

On 19/07/15 23:18, Florian Weimer wrote: * Ben Caradoc-Davies: On 19/07/15 21:52, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jérémy Lal: i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where maintainers could be added. Github has a single-account-per-person policy (unless you pay, I think), s

Re: debian github organization ?

* Andrew Shadura: > On 19 July 2015 at 11:52, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where >>> maintainers could be added. >> >> Github has a single-account-per-person policy (unless you pay, I >> think), so for those of us with multiple affil

Re: debian github organization ?

On 19 July 2015 at 11:52, Florian Weimer wrote: >> i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where >> maintainers could be added. > > Github has a single-account-per-person policy (unless you pay, I > think), so for those of us with multiple affiliations, it is difficult >

Re: debian github organization ?

* Ben Caradoc-Davies: > On 19/07/15 21:52, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Jérémy Lal: >>> i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where >>> maintainers could be added. >> Github has a single-account-per-person policy (unless you pay, I >> think), so for those of us with mult

Re: debian github organization ?

* Jérémy Lal: > i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where > maintainers could be added. Github has a single-account-per-person policy (unless you pay, I think), so for those of us with multiple affiliations, it is difficult to join a Debian organization on Github.

Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project (was: debian github organization ?)

On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > I will be working on it. First task is to complete gitlab packaging. > See balasankarc.in/gitlab for current status. That is quite a progress. Awesome, thanks! Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer

Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project (was: debian github organization ?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I will be working on it. First task is to complete gitlab packaging. See balasankarc.in/gitlab for current status. Gitlab folks sponsored 60 days of work with 3000 usd. I post updates at poddery.com/tags/debian-gitlab-months On 2015, ജൂലൈ 11 6:51

Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project (was: debian github organization ?)

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Neil McGovern wrote: >> > It will be an instance of gitlab CE, under MIT license and managed by >> > Debian. Gitlab folks will just sponsor the hosting. >> >> Much appreciated, thank you to GitLab B.V. for this generous offer. Just out of curiosity, has anybody ma

Funding FusionForge development for missing features on Alioth (like pull request) - Was: Re: debian github organization ?

Hi. Olivier Berger writes: > Russ Allbery writes: > >> >> That said, something more akin to GitHub (including the nice integration >> API and fork/pull model) running on a service like Alioth would be very >> neat. >> > > Feel free to add to : > -> > https://fusionforge.org/tracker/index.php?f

Re: debian github organization ?

On Apr 22, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >Seems to work fairly well, certainly it is robust enough to not have >500 Internal Server Errors. File a bug? :) Cheers, -Barry pgp393q5a3UIo.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project (was: debian github organization ?)

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 01:25:42PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Sytse Sijbrandij writes: > > > Awesome that you are considering to move to Git. > > Note that this is not “moving to Git”. A great deal of Debian > development is already done using Git, and that's not going to be > directly affected

GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project (was: debian github organization ?)

Sytse Sijbrandij writes: > Awesome that you are considering to move to Git. Note that this is not “moving to Git”. A great deal of Debian development is already done using Git, and that's not going to be directly affected much by a Debian GitLab instance. Rather, this is the Debian project cons

Re: debian github organization ?

It will be an instance of gitlab CE, under MIT license and managed by Debian. Gitlab folks will just sponsor the hosting. Nicolas Dandrimont എഴുതി: > Hi, > > * Pirate Praveen [2015-04-21 20:24:09 +0530]:>> On > Thursday 16 April 2015 08:34 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:>>> I'd rather see > git

Re: debian github organization ?

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Can you navigate github without JS? Seems to work fairly well, certainly it is robust enough to not have 500 Internal Server Errors. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.d

Re: debian github organization ?

On Apr 22, 2015, at 10:40 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >I don't like it due to the JavaScript requirement, many things just >give 500 Internal Server Error unless you have JS turned on. Can you navigate github without JS? Cheers, -Barry pgp2Hk9JVhtjQ.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: debian github organization ?

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:04 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > >>I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) > > +1 > > I've started moving my personal projects to gitlab and like it a lot. I don't like it due to the JavaScript requirement, many things ju

Re: debian github organization ?

Awesome that you are considering to move to Git. GitLab B.V. would be more than happy to help with gitlab.debian.net and pay for the hosting. This in collaboration with volunteers such as Praveen and while ensuring that Debian is fully in control. Best regards, Sytse 'Sid' Sijbrandij CEO GitLab B.

Re: debian github organization ?

On Apr 16, 2015, at 11:13 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: >Launchpad, similarly, is probably suffering a lot from the decision to >only support bzr. That will probably be solved soon. From watching the commits to Launchpad trunk, it looks like git support is progressing nicely. I expect after some reas

Re: debian github organization ?

On Apr 16, 2015, at 07:19 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote: >> I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) > >Why Gitlab when there's Kallithea? :) Kallithea is under consideration as forge for upstream Python: http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0462/ Cheers, -Barry pgpxAfgqu1BlU.pgp Description: OpenPGP

Re: debian github organization ?

On Apr 18, 2015, at 02:56 PM, Stuart Prescott wrote: >arch 7 >bzr199 >cvs11 >darcs 832 >git12439 >hg 65 >mtn23 >svn3593 I hope at some point soon after Jessie is released that the DPMT will officially switch from svn to git. Cheers, -Barry pgpZjFyDVmRKn.pgp Descripti

Re: debian github organization ?

On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:04 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) +1 I've started moving my personal projects to gitlab and like it a lot. Cheers, -Barry pgpEtXwHRd4zO.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: debian github organization ?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 05:41:56PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > I sure hope that won't mean getting Debian onboard the proprietary > edition of their software, but rather them helping the proper > packaging of their software. +1 And, besides, we should have by now all learned that 3rd party

Re: debian github organization ?

Hi, * Pirate Praveen [2015-04-21 20:24:09 +0530]: > On Thursday 16 April 2015 08:34 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) > > gitlab folks are willing to sponsor gitlab.debian.net I will try to take > that offer forward. I sure hope t

Re: debian github organization ?

Russ Allbery writes: > > That said, something more akin to GitHub (including the nice integration > API and fork/pull model) running on a service like Alioth would be very > neat. > Feel free to add to : -> https://fusionforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=741&group_id=6&atid=114 Btw,

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thursday 16 April 2015 08:34 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) gitlab folks are willing to sponsor gitlab.debian.net I will try to take that offer forward. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: debian github organization ?

On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:12:57 +1200 Robert Collins wrote: > On 18 April 2015 at 08:03, Ben Finney > wrote: > > Paul Tagliamonte writes: > > > >> So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't > >> think this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we > >> should endorse

Re: debian github organization ?

❦ 19 avril 2015 08:55 GMT, Brian May  : > I suspect not many people know about this however (did I miss an > announcement from github on this?), and I suspect it may not be > possible to make changes to the pull request without write access to > the branch. Yes, that's not possible. > Unlike wi

Re: debian github organization ?

On 18 April 2015 at 08:03, Ben Finney wrote: > Paul Tagliamonte writes: > >> So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't think >> this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we should >> endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools. Yes, we should contribute to >> the F/O

Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with Git ‘request-pull’ (was: debian github organization ?)

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:13:32PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > To those of you who are willing to use github for Debian related > things, it would be great if you could: > > Mirror the repositories to alioth so Debian has a backup. I'd rather see it the other way around: advertise the alioth Git re

Re: debian github organization ?

On 17 April 2015 at 18:13, Russ Allbery wrote: > Marc Haber writes: > >> Thankfully, git is by far the best VCS on the market and the vast >> majority of people seem to agree. But imagine the outcry if ten years >> ago Sourceforge had said "our VCS is svn and we don't support anything >> else". >

Re: debian github organization ?

On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 at 18:25 Vincent Bernat wrote: > This is not the case anymore. Deleting a branch leaves the pull request > as is. Also, editing commits leave the history of the pull request in > the timeline. Comments on edited commits are also still accessible. > Oh, if that is the case tha

Re: debian github organization ?

❦ 19 avril 2015 07:34 GMT, Brian May  : > Unfortunately, github pull requests have limitations compared with > patches, archived for example on a mailing list. For blog post on this > see: > > https://julien.danjou.info/blog/2013/rant-about-github-pull-request-workflow-implementation > > IIRC, my

Re: debian github organization ?

On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 at 18:01 Neil Williams wrote: > The github pull request is just a nice UI over a patch. What on earth > is wrong with that? > Unfortunately, github pull requests have limitations compared with patches, archived for example on a mailing list. For blog post on this see: https

Re: debian github organization ?

On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 12:07 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: > gitg is quite good for simple tasks. I'm guessing it isn't good enough to be a replacement for the github web UI though and that there is no equivalent free software desktop UI. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.a

Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with Git ‘request-pull’ (was: debian github organization ?)

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > Everyone's willing to make tradeoffs on our freedom. It's what tradeoffs > we make, that's the question. To those of you who are willing to use github for Debian related things, it would be great if you could: Mirror the repositories to

Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with Git ‘request-pull’ (was: debian github organization ?)

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 05:55:17PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > Sometimes I wonder if people think free software is so fragile that if > > anyone who works on it ever touches non-free software, everything we > > built will crumble. I think our community and ecosystem is a lot more > > robust than t

Re: debian github organization ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/18/2015 01:09 PM, Neil Williams wrote: > On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:04:40 +0800 Paul Wise > wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Neil Williams wrote: >> >>> git won the DVCS argument a long time ago. github won the DVCS >>> UI argument

Re: debian github organization ?

On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:04:40 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Neil Williams wrote: > > > git won the DVCS argument a long time ago. github won the DVCS UI > > argument a long time ago - it is clearly the one UI that the > > largest number of git contributors actually wan

Re: debian github organization ?

2015-04-18 12:16 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Smirnov : > On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 12:07:22 Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > Are there any good DFSG-free desktop UIs for git? > > > > gitg is quite good for simple tasks. > > 0.2.7 is still good but unfortunately upstream ruined newer versions... :( I guess it's a matter o

Re: debian github organization ?

On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 12:07:22 Jérémy Lal wrote: > > Are there any good DFSG-free desktop UIs for git? > > gitg is quite good for simple tasks. 0.2.7 is still good but unfortunately upstream ruined newer versions... :( -- Cheers, Dmitry Smirnov. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally s

Re: debian github organization ?

2015-04-18 12:04 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise : > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Neil Williams wrote: > > > git won the DVCS argument a long time ago. github won the DVCS UI > > argument a long time ago - it is clearly the one UI that the > > largest number of git contributors actually want to use. > > A

Re: debian github organization ?

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Neil Williams wrote: > git won the DVCS argument a long time ago. github won the DVCS UI > argument a long time ago - it is clearly the one UI that the > largest number of git contributors actually want to use. Are there any good DFSG-free desktop UIs for git? --

Re: GitHub “pull request” is useful and can be easily integrated'’ (was: debian github organization ?)

On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:55:17 +1000 Ben Finney wrote: > Russ Allbery writes: > > > Ben Finney writes: > > GitHub's pull request feature is proprietary to GitHub, it can only > work between repositories hosted inside the GitHub silo, and any > project using that feature is thereby locking its w

Re: debian github organization ?

On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:44:34 +1000 Ben Finney wrote: > Russ Allbery writes: > > > Steve McIntyre writes: > > > Agreed - it's really annoying to see everybody clamour for a > > > centralised single point of of failure for git hosting. :-( > > > > Funny, this is why I don't get why people are so

GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with Git ‘request-pull’ (was: debian github organization ?)

Russ Allbery writes: > Ben Finney writes: > > Yet it is exactly those lock-in features that is the basis for > > arguments to put special effort into the centralised single point of > > failure. > > > For example, the centralised proprietary GitHub “pull request” is > > presented as a reason to

Re: debian github organization ?

On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 00:01:29 +0100 Steve McIntyre wrote: > Ben Finney wrote: > >Paul Tagliamonte writes: > > > >> So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't > >> think this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we > >> should endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tool

Re: debian github organization ?

On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 06:03:12 +1000 Ben Finney wrote: > Paul Tagliamonte writes: > > > So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't > > think this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we > > should endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools. Yes, we should > > contrib

Re: debian github organization ?

Jonathan Dowland wrote: > Some people and teams in Debian do manage their package sources in git; > others don't. I'm not sure what the stats are at the moment for the > various approaches; there might be a UDD script already that generates > some. I was interested in looking at this, once upon a t

Re: debian github organization ?

On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 17:06 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:22:53PM +0800, mudongliang wrote: > > But I know that debian does not manager source code by git ! > > How can it?? > > Some people and teams in Debian do manage their package sources in git; others > don't. I

Re: debian github organization ?

Ben Finney writes: > Russ Allbery writes: >> Funny, this is why I don't get why people are so upset that some use >> GitHub. Because of how Git works, the impact of lock-in is pretty much >> limited to the non-repository stuff (issues and so forth). > Yet it is exactly those lock-in features th

Re: debian github organization ?

Russ Allbery writes: > Steve McIntyre writes: > > Agreed - it's really annoying to see everybody clamour for a > > centralised single point of of failure for git hosting. :-( > > Funny, this is why I don't get why people are so upset that some use > GitHub. Because of how Git works, the impact o

Re: debian github organization ?

Steve McIntyre writes: > Ben Finney wrote: >> Paul Tagliamonte writes: >>> So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't think >>> this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we should >>> endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools. Yes, we should contribute to >>> the F

Re: debian github organization ?

Ben Finney wrote: >Paul Tagliamonte writes: > >> So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't think >> this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we should >> endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools. Yes, we should contribute to >> the F/OSS community where upstreams

Re: debian github organization ?

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 06:03:12AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Upstream is using a decentralised VCS, it seems a little condescending > to assume they are incapable of using it. An entirely fair point, however, I also think it's quite rude to ignore the workflow they've chosen for contributions --

Re: debian github organization ?

Paul Tagliamonte writes: > So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't think > this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we should > endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools. Yes, we should contribute to > the F/OSS community where upstreams are. That last part see

Re: debian github organization ?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 03:36:45PM -0300, João Vanzuita wrote: > And wanna ask you guys to answer the Jonathan Downland question bellow. > > On 17/04/15 13:06, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >The real question is: what do we gain by hosting such things on github? > >The social stuff, pull requests, etc

Re: debian github organization ?

That's a very nice starting point! Maybe it's a good ideia, but I'm still asking myself why. And wanna ask you guys to answer the Jonathan Downland question bellow. On 17/04/15 13:06, Jonathan Dowland wrote: The real question is: what do we gain by hosting such things on github? The social stu

Re: debian github organization ?

"Milan P. Stanic" writes: > What about gitolite? It is in Debian, can be used with gitweb and have > access control. > N.B. I'm biased (maybe) because I use gitolite for my company > repositories. gitolite is very nice insofar as it goes. I've used it a lot, and still use it in various places.

Re: debian github organization ?

On a side note to this thread, GitLab packaging for Debian is happening silently (and of course slowly) in the Debian Ruby group. Anyone is welcome to help. :) On 17 April 2015 11:07:37 am IST, Marc Haber wrote: >On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:40:21 -0700, Russ Allbery >wrote: >>Iustin Pop writes: >

Re: debian github organization ?

On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 16:10, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > On 04/16/2015 05:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) > or gitblit, which would be easier to integrate into ldap/sso/ssh imho. What about gitolite? It is in Debian, can be used with

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:22:53PM +0800, mudongliang wrote: > But I know that debian does not manager source code by git ! > How can it?? Some people and teams in Debian do manage their package sources in git; others don't. I'm not sure what the stats are at the moment for the various approaches;

Re: debian github organization ?

On 04/16/2015 05:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) or gitblit, which would be easier to integrate into ldap/sso/ssh imho. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Sven Bartscher wrote: > I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian, > since we already have alioth. > Maybe someone can enlighten me. I'd love to see the Debian infrastructure rely of Free software, firmware and hardware. However, we ar

Re: debian github organization ?

On 16 Apr 2015 12:05 pm, "Sven Bartscher" < sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:04:07 -0600 > Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) > > I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian, > since we already have

Re: debian github organization ?

Russell Stuart writes: > On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 23:13 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> However, I still stand by the decision to only support a single VCS, at >> least when you start, because you can move a lot faster and implement a >> lot more functionality that people care a great deal about. > W

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 23:13:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >Marc Haber writes: >> Thankfully, git is by far the best VCS on the market and the vast >> majority of people seem to agree. But imagine the outcry if ten years >> ago Sourceforge had said "our VCS is svn and we don't support anything >> el

Re: debian github organization ?

First a Mel Cupa. I called the SourceForge system Apollo. It's actual name is Apache Allura. Brain fart. On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 23:13 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Er, they did, didn't they? I could have sworn that they only supported > CVS initially, and then only added Subversion, and getting

Re: debian github organization ?

Marc Haber writes: > Thankfully, git is by far the best VCS on the market and the vast > majority of people seem to agree. But imagine the outcry if ten years > ago Sourceforge had said "our VCS is svn and we don't support anything > else". Er, they did, didn't they? I could have sworn that the

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:40:21 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >Iustin Pop writes: >> I think the VCS agnosticism is actually detrimental in this context. >> It's much easier for the user when every repo is using the same VCS. >> And consistency makes it very easy, for example, to refer to commits >> ac

Re: debian github organization ?

Iustin Pop writes: > I think the VCS agnosticism is actually detrimental in this context. > It's much easier for the user when every repo is using the same VCS. > And consistency makes it very easy, for example, to refer to commits > across projects, to standardise pull/clone workflows, etc. +1.

Re: debian github organization ?

On 2015-04-17 10:54:43, Russell Stuart wrote: > Github has all but > annihilated SourceForge in the hosting market place, and the stand out > change is it's UI. That is in spite of SourceForge's impressive mirror > network and SourceForge being VCS agnostic. I think the VCS agnosticism is actuall

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 19:37 +0200, Sven Bartscher wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:04:07 -0600 > Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) > > I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian, > since we already have alioth. > Maybe someone can enl

Re: debian github organization ?

On 04/16/2015 09:19 PM, Alexander Alemayhu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:15:07PM +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: >> I'm not a DD, but I'd suggest to consider "Gogs", too. It's pretty new >> and unfinished, but potentially is much better than "GitLab", IMHO. > > I'm not a DD either but +1 :) I

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:11:29 +0200 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, "Jérémy Lal" wrote: > > i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, > > where maintainers could be added. > > there is: https://github.com/debian I've already got a bunch of other stuff on

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:15:07PM +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: > > I'm not a DD, but I'd suggest to consider "Gogs", too. It's pretty new > and unfinished, but potentially is much better than "GitLab", IMHO. > I'm not a DD either but +1 :) I tried it out awhile back from the try site[0]and it

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:04:07 -0600 Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian, since we already have alioth. Maybe someone can enlighten me. Regards Sven pgphXmA_4Agbj.pgp Description: Digitale Signat

Re: debian github organization ?

> I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) Why Gitlab when there's Kallithea? :) -- Cheers, Andrew

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where > maintainers could be added. It would probably better to use free tools instead? http://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/Paul

Re: debian github organization ?

On 04/16/2015 06:09 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) I'm not a DD, but I'd suggest to consider "Gogs", too. It's pretty new and unfinished, but potentially is much better than "GitLab", IMHO. Best rega

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 17:11 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, "Jérémy Lal" wrote: > > i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where > > maintainers could be added. > > there is: https://github.com/debian > > > This is a scary pandora box, though :

Re: debian github organization ?

On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, "Jérémy Lal" wrote: > i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where > maintainers could be added. there is: https://github.com/debian > This is a scary pandora box, though :) indeed. it could be nice, but i'd rather avoid it. On Thu, Apr 16, 2

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) Good one Dimitri! I started to use Gitlab for serious work only recently, and well I love it. So +1 from me, I volunteer to help out with that. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotr

Re: debian github organization ?

I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) Which is similar in spirit to ask.debian.net. PS. Sorry for top reply from mobile phone. On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, "Jérémy Lal" wrote: > Hello, > > i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where > maintainers could be added. > > This i

Re: debian github organization ?

Quoting Jérémy Lal (2015-04-16 15:45:34) > i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, > where maintainers could be added. Wouldn't surprise me, but I don't know (not interested). > This is a scary pandora box, though :) If you add that remark to appeace those disliking

debian github organization ?

Hello, i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where maintainers could be added. This is a scary pandora box, though :) Jérémy.