On Apr 22, 2015, at 01:25 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>Rather, this is the Debian project considering our own instance of a
>first-class Git hosting platform.
I guess this would mean being able to use the Debian GitLab instance for
package development, rather than say Alioth? For straight-up hosting
Ben Caradoc-Davies b...@transient.nz writes:
On 19/07/15 23:36, Florian Weimer wrote:
The single account policy means that users
would have to share authentication information across different roles,
which may not be acceptable.
I am not sure why this would be unacceptable to anyone.
* Jérémy Lal:
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be added.
Github has a single-account-per-person policy (unless you pay, I
think), so for those of us with multiple affiliations, it is difficult
to join a Debian organization on Github.
* Andrew Shadura:
On 19 July 2015 at 11:52, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be added.
Github has a single-account-per-person policy (unless you pay, I
think), so for those of us with multiple
On 19/07/15 21:52, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jérémy Lal:
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be added.
Github has a single-account-per-person policy (unless you pay, I
think), so for those of us with multiple affiliations, it is difficult
to
* Ben Caradoc-Davies:
On 19/07/15 21:52, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jérémy Lal:
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be added.
Github has a single-account-per-person policy (unless you pay, I
think), so for those of us with multiple
On 19 July 2015 at 11:52, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be added.
Github has a single-account-per-person policy (unless you pay, I
think), so for those of us with multiple affiliations, it is
On 19/07/15 23:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Ben Caradoc-Davies:
On 19/07/15 21:52, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jérémy Lal:
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be added.
Github has a single-account-per-person policy (unless you pay, I
think),
On 19/07/15 23:36, Florian Weimer wrote:
The single account policy means that users
would have to share authentication information across different roles,
which may not be acceptable.
I am not sure why this would be unacceptable to anyone. Authentication
is your ability to prove who you are.
Ben Caradoc-Davies writes (Re: debian github organization ?):
On 19/07/15 23:36, Florian Weimer wrote:
The single account policy means that users
would have to share authentication information across different roles,
which may not be acceptable.
I am not sure why this would
On 20/07/15 12:18, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ben Caradoc-Davies writes (Re: debian github organization ?):
I am not sure why this would be unacceptable to anyone. Authentication
is your ability to prove who you are. GitHub accounts provide this.
You're talking as if what is identified is a human
Ben Caradoc-Davies b...@transient.nz writes:
On 20/07/15 12:18, Ian Jackson wrote:
You're talking as if what is identified is a human being. But of
course, it isn't. When you do a git push (or whatever) what is pushed
is controlled by the computer you are using.
Of course. Humans lack a
On 20/07/15 14:50, Russ Allbery wrote:
Er, you're responding to Ian as if you've never before heard of the
concept of using separate authentication credentials for different
purposes, but this is a very old and respected technique and a standard
security approach. It's a form of privilege
Ben Caradoc-Davies b...@transient.nz writes:
The problem with per-role accounts is the loss of connection and
reputation on loss of account. The growth of social media and social
coding is changing the workplace. No longer is a role associated with a
job. Rather, reputation and authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I will be working on it. First task is to complete gitlab packaging. See
balasankarc.in/gitlab for current status. Gitlab folks sponsored 60 days of
work with 3000 usd. I post updates at poddery.com/tags/debian-gitlab-months
On 2015, ജൂലൈ 11
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org wrote:
It will be an instance of gitlab CE, under MIT license and managed by
Debian. Gitlab folks will just sponsor the hosting.
Much appreciated, thank you to GitLab B.V. for this generous offer.
Just out of curiosity, has
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Pirate Praveen
prav...@onenetbeyond.org wrote:
I will be working on it. First task is to complete gitlab packaging.
See balasankarc.in/gitlab for current status.
That is quite a progress. Awesome, thanks!
Cheers.
--
Alessio Treglia |
Hi.
Olivier Berger ober...@debian.org writes:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
That said, something more akin to GitHub (including the nice integration
API and fork/pull model) running on a service like Alioth would be very
neat.
Feel free to add to :
-
On Apr 22, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
Seems to work fairly well, certainly it is robust enough to not have
500 Internal Server Errors.
File a bug? :)
Cheers,
-Barry
pgp393q5a3UIo.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 01:25:42PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Sytse Sijbrandij sy...@gitlab.com writes:
Awesome that you are considering to move to Git.
Note that this is not “moving to Git”. A great deal of Debian
development is already done using Git, and that's not going to be
directly
On Thursday 16 April 2015 08:34 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net http://gitlab.debian.net :)
gitlab folks are willing to sponsor gitlab.debian.net I will try to take
that offer forward.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
That said, something more akin to GitHub (including the nice integration
API and fork/pull model) running on a service like Alioth would be very
neat.
Feel free to add to :
-
https://fusionforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=741group_id=6atid=114
Hi,
* Pirate Praveen prav...@onenetbeyond.org [2015-04-21 20:24:09 +0530]:
On Thursday 16 April 2015 08:34 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net http://gitlab.debian.net :)
gitlab folks are willing to sponsor gitlab.debian.net I will try to take
that offer
On Apr 16, 2015, at 07:19 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
Why Gitlab when there's Kallithea? :)
Kallithea is under consideration as forge for upstream Python:
http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0462/
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpxAfgqu1BlU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP
On Apr 16, 2015, at 11:13 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Launchpad, similarly, is probably suffering a lot from the decision to
only support bzr.
That will probably be solved soon. From watching the commits to Launchpad
trunk, it looks like git support is progressing nicely. I expect after
some
On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:04 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
+1
I've started moving my personal projects to gitlab and like it a lot.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpEtXwHRd4zO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
It will be an instance of gitlab CE, under MIT license and managed by Debian.
Gitlab folks will just sponsor the hosting.
Nicolas Dandrimont എഴുതി:
Hi,
* Pirate Praveen prav...@onenetbeyond.org [2015-04-21 20:24:09 +0530]: On
Thursday 16 April 2015 08:34 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: I'd
Awesome that you are considering to move to Git. GitLab B.V. would be
more than happy to help with gitlab.debian.net and pay for the
hosting. This in collaboration with volunteers such as Praveen and
while ensuring that Debian is fully in control.
Best regards,
Sytse 'Sid' Sijbrandij
CEO GitLab
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:04 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
+1
I've started moving my personal projects to gitlab and like it a lot.
I don't like it due to the JavaScript requirement, many things just
give
On Apr 22, 2015, at 10:40 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
I don't like it due to the JavaScript requirement, many things just
give 500 Internal Server Error unless you have JS turned on.
Can you navigate github without JS?
Cheers,
-Barry
pgp2Hk9JVhtjQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Can you navigate github without JS?
Seems to work fairly well, certainly it is robust enough to not have
500 Internal Server Errors.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Sytse Sijbrandij sy...@gitlab.com writes:
Awesome that you are considering to move to Git.
Note that this is not “moving to Git”. A great deal of Debian
development is already done using Git, and that's not going to be
directly affected much by a Debian GitLab instance.
Rather, this is the
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 05:41:56PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
I sure hope that won't mean getting Debian onboard the proprietary
edition of their software, but rather them helping the proper
packaging of their software.
+1
And, besides, we should have by now all learned that 3rd party
On Apr 18, 2015, at 02:56 PM, Stuart Prescott wrote:
arch 7
bzr199
cvs11
darcs 832
git12439
hg 65
mtn23
svn3593
I hope at some point soon after Jessie is released that the DPMT will
officially switch from svn to git.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpZjFyDVmRKn.pgp
Description:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 at 18:25 Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org wrote:
This is not the case anymore. Deleting a branch leaves the pull request
as is. Also, editing commits leave the history of the pull request in
the timeline. Comments on edited commits are also still accessible.
Oh, if that
On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 12:07 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
gitg is quite good for simple tasks.
I'm guessing it isn't good enough to be a replacement for the github web
UI though and that there is no equivalent free software desktop UI.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On 17 April 2015 at 18:13, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Marc Haber mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de writes:
Thankfully, git is by far the best VCS on the market and the vast
majority of people seem to agree. But imagine the outcry if ten years
ago Sourceforge had said our VCS is svn and we
On 18 April 2015 at 08:03, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't think
this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we should
endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:13:32PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
To those of you who are willing to use github for Debian related
things, it would be great if you could:
Mirror the repositories to alioth so Debian has a backup.
I'd rather see it the other way around: advertise the alioth Git repo
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:12:57 +1200
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 18 April 2015 at 08:03, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au
wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't
think this should be the
❦ 19 avril 2015 08:55 GMT, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au :
I suspect not many people know about this however (did I miss an
announcement from github on this?), and I suspect it may not be
possible to make changes to the pull request without write access to
the branch.
Yes, that's
❦ 19 avril 2015 07:34 GMT, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au :
Unfortunately, github pull requests have limitations compared with
patches, archived for example on a mailing list. For blog post on this
see:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 at 18:01 Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
The github pull request is just a nice UI over a patch. What on earth
is wrong with that?
Unfortunately, github pull requests have limitations compared with patches,
archived for example on a mailing list. For blog post on
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:04:40 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
git won the DVCS argument a long time ago. github won the DVCS UI
argument a long time ago - it is clearly the one UI that the
largest number of git contributors
2015-04-18 12:16 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 12:07:22 Jérémy Lal wrote:
Are there any good DFSG-free desktop UIs for git?
gitg is quite good for simple tasks.
0.2.7 is still good but unfortunately upstream ruined newer versions... :(
I guess it's a
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 05:55:17PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Sometimes I wonder if people think free software is so fragile that if
anyone who works on it ever touches non-free software, everything we
built will crumble. I think our community and ecosystem is a lot more
robust than that.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/18/2015 01:09 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:04:40 +0800 Paul Wise p...@debian.org
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
git won the DVCS argument a long time ago. github won the DVCS
UI
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Everyone's willing to make tradeoffs on our freedom. It's what tradeoffs
we make, that's the question.
To those of you who are willing to use github for Debian related
things, it would be great if you could:
Mirror the repositories to
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 06:03:12 +1000
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't
think this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we
should endorse GitHub. Yes, we need
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 00:01:29 +0100
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Ben Finney wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't
think this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we
should endorse GitHub.
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Yet it is exactly those lock-in features that is the basis for
arguments to put special effort into the centralised single point of
failure.
For example, the centralised proprietary GitHub “pull request”
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:44:34 +1000
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com writes:
Agreed - it's really annoying to see everybody clamour for a
centralised single point of of failure for git hosting. :-(
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:55:17 +1000
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
GitHub's pull request feature is proprietary to GitHub, it can only
work between repositories hosted inside the GitHub silo,
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
git won the DVCS argument a long time ago. github won the DVCS UI
argument a long time ago - it is clearly the one UI that the
largest number of git contributors actually want to use.
Are there any good DFSG-free desktop UIs for git?
--
2015-04-18 12:04 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise p...@debian.org:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
git won the DVCS argument a long time ago. github won the DVCS UI
argument a long time ago - it is clearly the one UI that the
largest number of git contributors actually want to
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 12:07:22 Jérémy Lal wrote:
Are there any good DFSG-free desktop UIs for git?
gitg is quite good for simple tasks.
0.2.7 is still good but unfortunately upstream ruined newer versions... :(
--
Cheers,
Dmitry Smirnov.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
First a Mel Cupa. I called the SourceForge system Apollo. It's actual
name is Apache Allura. Brain fart.
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 23:13 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Er, they did, didn't they? I could have sworn that they only supported
CVS initially, and then only added Subversion, and getting
Marc Haber mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de writes:
Thankfully, git is by far the best VCS on the market and the vast
majority of people seem to agree. But imagine the outcry if ten years
ago Sourceforge had said our VCS is svn and we don't support anything
else.
Er, they did, didn't they? I
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 23:13:01 -0700, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org
wrote:
Marc Haber mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de writes:
Thankfully, git is by far the best VCS on the market and the vast
majority of people seem to agree. But imagine the outcry if ten years
ago Sourceforge had said our VCS is svn
Russell Stuart russell-deb...@stuart.id.au writes:
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 23:13 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
However, I still stand by the decision to only support a single VCS, at
least when you start, because you can move a lot faster and implement a
lot more functionality that people care a
On 16 Apr 2015 12:05 pm, Sven Bartscher
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:04:07 -0600
Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org wrote:
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian,
since we already
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Sven Bartscher
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de wrote:
I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian,
since we already have alioth.
Maybe someone can enlighten me.
I'd love to see the Debian infrastructure rely of Free software,
On 04/16/2015 05:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net http://gitlab.debian.net :)
or gitblit, which would be easier to integrate into ldap/sso/ssh imho.
--
Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de
Milan P. Stanic m...@arvanta.net writes:
What about gitolite? It is in Debian, can be used with gitweb and have
access control.
N.B. I'm biased (maybe) because I use gitolite for my company
repositories.
gitolite is very nice insofar as it goes. I've used it a lot, and still
use it in
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 16:10, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 04/16/2015 05:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net http://gitlab.debian.net :)
or gitblit, which would be easier to integrate into ldap/sso/ssh imho.
What about gitolite? It is in Debian, can be used with
On a side note to this thread, GitLab packaging for Debian is happening
silently (and of course slowly) in the Debian Ruby group. Anyone is welcome to
help. :)
On 17 April 2015 11:07:37 am IST, Marc Haber mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:40:21 -0700, Russ Allbery
That's a very nice starting point!
Maybe it's a good ideia, but I'm still asking myself why.
And wanna ask you guys to answer the Jonathan Downland question bellow.
On 17/04/15 13:06, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
The real question is: what do we gain by hosting such things on
github? The social
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 03:36:45PM -0300, João Vanzuita wrote:
And wanna ask you guys to answer the Jonathan Downland question bellow.
On 17/04/15 13:06, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
The real question is: what do we gain by hosting such things on github?
The social stuff, pull requests, etc.?
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't think
this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we should
endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools. Yes, we should contribute to
the F/OSS community where upstreams are.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 06:03:12AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Upstream is using a decentralised VCS, it seems a little condescending
to assume they are incapable of using it.
An entirely fair point, however, I also think it's quite rude to ignore
the workflow they've chosen for contributions --
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 17:06 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:22:53PM +0800, mudongliang wrote:
But I know that debian does not manager source code by git !
How can it??
Some people and teams in Debian do manage their package sources in git; others
don't. I'm not
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Some people and teams in Debian do manage their package sources in git;
others don't. I'm not sure what the stats are at the moment for the
various approaches; there might be a UDD script already that generates
some. I was interested in looking at this, once upon a
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:22:53PM +0800, mudongliang wrote:
But I know that debian does not manager source code by git !
How can it??
Some people and teams in Debian do manage their package sources in git; others
don't. I'm not sure what the stats are at the moment for the various
approaches;
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Funny, this is why I don't get why people are so upset that some use
GitHub. Because of how Git works, the impact of lock-in is pretty much
limited to the non-repository stuff (issues and so forth).
Yet it is
Ben Finney wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't think
this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we should
endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools. Yes, we should contribute to
the F/OSS community where
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com writes:
Ben Finney wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't think
this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we should
endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools. Yes, we should
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com writes:
Agreed - it's really annoying to see everybody clamour for a
centralised single point of of failure for git hosting. :-(
Funny, this is why I don't get why people are so upset that some use
GitHub. Because of how
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
Which is similar in spirit to ask.debian.net.
PS. Sorry for top reply from mobile phone.
On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Hello,
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org wrote:
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
Good one Dimitri!
I started to use Gitlab for serious work only recently, and well I love it.
So +1 from me, I volunteer to help out with that.
Cheers!
--
Alessio Treglia
On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be added.
there is: https://github.com/debian
This is a scary pandora box, though :)
indeed. it could be nice, but i'd rather avoid it.
On
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 17:11 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be added.
there is: https://github.com/debian
This is a scary pandora box,
On 04/16/2015 06:09 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org wrote:
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
I'm not a DD, but I'd suggest to consider Gogs, too. It's pretty new
and unfinished, but potentially is much better than GitLab, IMHO.
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
Why Gitlab when there's Kallithea? :)
--
Cheers,
Andrew
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be added.
It would probably better to use free tools instead?
http://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html
--
bye,
pabs
Hello,
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be added.
This is a scary pandora box, though :)
Jérémy.
Quoting Jérémy Lal (2015-04-16 15:45:34)
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization,
where maintainers could be added.
Wouldn't surprise me, but I don't know (not interested).
This is a scary pandora box, though :)
If you add that remark to appeace those disliking
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:04:07 -0600
Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org wrote:
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian,
since we already have alioth.
Maybe someone can enlighten me.
Regards
Sven
pgphXmA_4Agbj.pgp
Description:
On 04/16/2015 09:19 PM, Alexander Alemayhu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:15:07PM +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I'd suggest to consider Gogs, too. It's pretty new
and unfinished, but potentially is much better than GitLab, IMHO.
I'm not a DD either but +1 :) I tried it
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:40:21 -0700, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org
wrote:
Iustin Pop ius...@debian.org writes:
I think the VCS agnosticism is actually detrimental in this context.
It's much easier for the user when every repo is using the same VCS.
And consistency makes it very easy, for example,
Iustin Pop ius...@debian.org writes:
I think the VCS agnosticism is actually detrimental in this context.
It's much easier for the user when every repo is using the same VCS.
And consistency makes it very easy, for example, to refer to commits
across projects, to standardise pull/clone
On 2015-04-17 10:54:43, Russell Stuart wrote:
Github has all but
annihilated SourceForge in the hosting market place, and the stand out
change is it's UI. That is in spite of SourceForge's impressive mirror
network and SourceForge being VCS agnostic.
I think the VCS agnosticism is actually
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 19:37 +0200, Sven Bartscher wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:04:07 -0600
Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org wrote:
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian,
since we already have alioth.
Maybe someone
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:15:07PM +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I'd suggest to consider Gogs, too. It's pretty new
and unfinished, but potentially is much better than GitLab, IMHO.
I'm not a DD either but +1 :) I tried it out awhile back from the try site[0]and
it just
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:11:29 +0200
Mattia Rizzolo mat...@mapreri.org wrote:
On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization,
where maintainers could be added.
there is: https://github.com/debian
I've already
94 matches
Mail list logo
