Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-27 Thread Yasuhiro Araki
Hi, I'm afraid I did not respond rapidly. I will try to add features on cdn.debian.net to support CNAME-to-CNAME. Anyone have a target date? 2013/6/7 Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: Re cdn: IIRC the main blocker was

Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-06 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: Re cdn: IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a bit painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to DNSSEC. And it uses the location of the DNS resolver of the user, which we

Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-06 Thread Raphael Geissert
Philipp Kern wrote: On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: Re cdn: IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a bit painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to DNSSEC. And it uses the location of the DNS resolver of

Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-06 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: Re cdn: IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a bit painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to DNSSEC. If you're not afraid of such hacks, CNAME-to-CNAME can simplify DNSSEC

http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 02/06/13 at 16:18 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: Le dimanche, 2 juin 2013 15.54:31, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Marcin Kulisz deb...@kulisz.net (02/06/2013): Why not to use http://http.debian.net/ ? Surely the .net part of it? If that's the reason, why do we have cdn.debian.net

Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-05 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Wed, June 5, 2013 09:12, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 02/06/13 at 16:18 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: Le dimanche, 2 juin 2013 15.54:31, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Marcin Kulisz deb...@kulisz.net (02/06/2013): Why not to use http://http.debian.net/ ? Surely the .net part of it? If

Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org (05/06/2013): On 02/06/13 at 16:18 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: Le dimanche, 2 juin 2013 15.54:31, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Marcin Kulisz deb...@kulisz.net (02/06/2013): Why not to use http://http.debian.net/ ? Surely the .net part of it?

Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-05 Thread Raphael Geissert
Cyril Brulebois wrote: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org (05/06/2013): Or, we could investigate whether one or the other could be made official? I guess Raphael and/or DSA would be happy to receive help, possibly on the “make it production-ready” front (matching DSA's expectations, etc.).