Re: nvidia-smi:i386/stretch-bpo

2019-03-26 Thread Daniel Reichelt
Thanks for your detailed explanation! > PS: today I uploaded src:nvidia-graphics-drivers with transitional > packages nvidia-driver, xserver-xorg-video-nvidia added on i386,armhf > that depend on the corresponding legacy driver packages. > I could do that for nvidia-smi as well. Any other (non-li

Re: nvidia-smi:i386/stretch-bpo

2019-03-26 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 26/3/19 a les 20:57, Andreas Beckmann ha escrit: [...] > > > Andreas > > PS: today I uploaded src:nvidia-graphics-drivers with transitional > packages nvidia-driver, xserver-xorg-video-nvidia added on i386,armhf > that depend on the corresponding legacy driver packages. > I could do that for

Re: nvidia-smi:i386/stretch-bpo

2019-03-26 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2019-03-26 19:57, Daniel Reichelt wrote: > I'm wondering why there's no nvidia-smi:i386=410.104-1~bpo9+1 but only > 390.87-8~bpo9+1. > > Has the binary package just not been built yet for i386/stretch-bpo or > is nvidia-smi no longer supported for i386 by upstream? Driver support for 32-bit ar

nvidia-smi:i386/stretch-bpo

2019-03-26 Thread Daniel Reichelt
Hi Axel, I'm wondering why there's no nvidia-smi:i386=410.104-1~bpo9+1 but only 390.87-8~bpo9+1. Has the binary package just not been built yet for i386/stretch-bpo or is nvidia-smi no longer supported for i386 by upstream? Thanks! Daniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature