ITP: golang-github-sajari-fuzzy -- Spell checking and fuzzy search suggestion written in Go

and fuzzy search suggestion written in Go Fuzzy is a very fast spell checker and query suggester written in Golang. Reason for packaging: Needed by go-task OpenPGP_0xD599E76CFFCABF60.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: a two cent suggestion

On 1.12.2022 12:16, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, 2022-11-26 at 19:42 +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: Any (or a specific group of) users could be able to install any package of the first class by their own without asking a sysadmin (or explicitly acquiring privilege of) user. The general idea of a

Re: a two cent suggestion

On Sat, 2022-11-26 at 19:42 +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: > Any (or a specific group of) users could be able to install any > package of the first class by their own without asking a sysadmin (or > explicitly acquiring privilege of) user. The general idea of a safe way to allow users to manage

allow users to install packages [was: Re: a two cent suggestion]

On 26.11.22 19:42, Patrice Duroux wrote: Dear Debian people, Already possible or not, I would like to have a Debian system for which packages can be installed either by a specific user (root/sysadmin as usual) only or by any other (or a group of) users. But this would also depend on the class

a two cent suggestion

Dear Debian people, Already possible or not, I would like to have a Debian system for which packages can be installed either by a specific user (root/sysadmin as usual) only or by any other (or a group of) users. But this would also depend on the class of the requested packages: 1. packages

Re: Suggestion for db.debian.org/machines.cgi page

On Mon, 2022-08-22 at 07:12 -0500, Steven Robbins wrote: > NOTE for whoever is maintaining the very nice > db.debian.org/machines.cgi page: https://salsa.debian.org/dsa-team/mirror/userdir-ldap-cgi/ > I guess that one should really be searching in the Description field > rather than

Suggestion for db.debian.org/machines.cgi page

On Monday, August 22, 2022 1:29:13 A.M. CDT Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 08:08:30AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > On 8/22/22 07:15, Steve Robbins wrote: > > > Oh. I did use Eller -- but the architecture is listed as mipsel. I need > > > mips64el> > > eller has mips64el

Re: needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma

>From the buildlogs / testlogs / local tests (ppc64el qemu), it seems that there is completely no improvement for ppc64el. Simple scripts can still encounter segmentation faults (e.g., autopkgtest for src:lua-moses). s390x is newly enabled. I still have not seen enough test log to give any

Re: needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma

Hi Frédéric, On 09-06-2022 16:19, Frédéric Bonnard wrote: did you see any improvement with luajit2 ? Improvements, yes. All fixed, no. I was looking at luakit, which still fails "silently" on ppc64el, a lua script generating a .h with no symbols with luajit2, where it does work with lua.

Re: needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma

Hi Mo, Paul, did you see any improvement with luajit2 ? I was looking at luakit, which still fails "silently" on ppc64el, a lua script generating a .h with no symbols with luajit2, where it does work with lua. Also I see that the autopkgtest of knot-resolver still fails on ppc64el. F. On Thu, 19

Re: needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma

On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 16:30 +0200, Frédéric Bonnard wrote: > Hi, > > I've followed luajit closely since 2015 on ppc64el as a porter > without enough knowledge to port it, but trying to ease on the > packaging/Debian side (being both IBMer/DD). > That port has been a mixed effort between a code

Re: needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma

Hi Dipack, I filed an ITP bug for luajit2 and will look into it. Thank you! On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 16:22 +, Dipak Zope1 wrote: > Hello all, > It'd be better to switch to luajit2 if it is possible. We can see > right now the main issue with luajit project is no response from > upstream of

Re: needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma

Hi, I've followed luajit closely since 2015 on ppc64el as a porter without enough knowledge to port it, but trying to ease on the packaging/Debian side (being both IBMer/DD). That port has been a mixed effort between a code bounty and an IBM effort (some devs) . It didn't started well (

Re: needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma

. Zhou Date: Thursday, 12 May 2022 at 8:07 AM To: debian-devel Subject: [EXTERNAL] needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma Hi folks, I learned in disappointment after becoming LuaJit uploader that the LuaJit upstream behaves uncooperatively especially for IBM architectures [1]. IIUC

Re: needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma

mmercial interest in working POWER/S390 support, he takes care of the package and makes sure it keeps working on these architectures. My suggestion would be to just pick the packages from openSUSE [1] since they are kept up-to-date. Adrian > [1] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:l

needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma

Hi folks, I learned in disappointment after becoming LuaJit uploader that the LuaJit upstream behaves uncooperatively especially for IBM architectures [1]. IIUC, the upstream has no intention to care about IBM architectures (ppc64el, s390x). The current ppc64el support on stable is done through

Suggestion: You should delete Mozilla ESR programs

Dear Woman and Man! Suggestion: You should delete Mozilla ESR programs otherwise you have double work for programming, testing. You should leave more time for the normal version. http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/52.0.2/linux-x86_64/en-US/ With kind Greetings!

Re: Fonts hinting to upstream suggestion

Hi Marek, Quoting Marek Mosiewicz (2019-01-24 09:49:35) > I have been trying to have good looking fonts in Debian. What I found > it seems that Firefox ignores dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config. > > It is not case for Chromium. After playing with native/autohinting > configuration it seems

Fonts hinting to upstream suggestion

Hello, I have been trying to have good looking fonts in Debian. What I found it seems that Firefox ignores dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config. It is not case for Chromium. After playing with native/autohinting configuration it seems that it is difficult to have all apps looking good, because

Re: Openvas too old - suggestion

Hello Hans The earlier message in this thread mentioned that Debian Testing is "frozen". You'll find more information about what this means here: https://release.debian.org/stretch/freeze_policy.html though that document is really written for people who are familiar with Debian development.

Re: Openvas too old - suggestion

Hi Andrey, > Now please look in experimental. Yes, I saw it in experimental. However, I wondered, why it is still not in unstable or testing, because in Kali it is already since weeks. > Please also remember that we are currently frozen. Of course, I forgot. This is an explanation, of course.

Re: Openvas too old - suggestion

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 07:48:39PM +0200, Hans wrote: > I see, that even in unstable openvas is still available in version 8. Now please look in experimental. Please also remember that we are currently frozen. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Openvas too old - suggestion

Dear developers, I see, that even in unstable openvas is still available in version 8. The actual version however is version 9. Of course I understand, that you have to check the stability and other things. But please allow me to suggest this: In Kali-Linux there are already binary packages

Re: Packaging suggestion for the Universal Media Server program.

Aldrin P. S. Castro wrote... > I would very much like the Universal Media Server to be in the Debian > repositories. > He is a very good dlna server. It is done in Java. Unfortunately, by mailing debian-devel your suggestion will very likely not reach the people who might be will

Packaging suggestion for the Universal Media Server program.

I would very much like the Universal Media Server to be in the Debian repositories. He is a very good dlna server. It is done in Java.

Re: Suggestion for the DontBreakDebian wiki page section "Dont 'make install'"

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:10:03 +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > El 20 oct. 2015 5:15 p. m., "Francisco José Fernández Naranjo" < > fjfnara...@gmail.com> escribió: >> >> I was considering myself adding a quick note to the section, but I am >> not an English native speaker and I am concerned

Re: Suggestion for the DontBreakDebian wiki page section "Dont 'make install'"

El 20 oct. 2015 5:15 p. m., "Francisco José Fernández Naranjo" < fjfnara...@gmail.com> escribió: > > I was considering myself adding a quick note to the section, but I am > not an English native speaker and I am concerned with the quality of > my contribution. In fact, your english level seems

Suggestion for the DontBreakDebian wiki page section "Dont 'make install'"

Hello guys. I was checking the DontBreakDebian wiki page and I realized one thing. In the section "Don't 'make install'" there is no mention to the alternative path installation options in automake or other building systems. Some people install packages in the system using "sudo" or root when

Re: pro-active removals (was: Re: suggestion to add package vlan to default instalation DVD)

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:55:58AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: this, I think it would be a *service* to our users if we removed this (and many other packages in similar situation) from the archive so that we don't fool users into using (or wasting time even looking at) long-deprecated

pro-active removals (was: Re: suggestion to add package vlan to default instalation DVD)

Hello all. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:10:15PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote: [...] > Why? The vlan package is not needed since at least Wheezy to configure > VLANs on devices since the program "ip" can do everything the same or > even better. > > Also ifupdown was changed to be able to configure

Re: suggestion to add package vlan to default instalation DVD

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: > Josef Masek wrote: > >> it is possible to add package "vlan" to the DVD instalation images? >> It is tiny package (36kB) and in some special environment (without >> Internet with DVD in vmware environmen) i

Re: suggestion to add package vlan to default instalation DVD

On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 15:26 -0400, Pascal Giard wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: > > Josef Masek wrote: > > > >> it is possible to add package "vlan" to the DVD instalation images? > >> It is tiny package (36kB) and in some special

suggestion to add package vlan to default instalation DVD

Hello, it is possible to add package "vlan" to the DVD instalation images? It is tiny package (36kB) and in some special environment (without Internet with DVD in vmware environmen) i have to download and install it manually. Ps. I did not find better mailing list for this purpose, so I am

Re: suggestion to add package vlan to default instalation DVD

Pascal Giard wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Josef Masek wrote: >>> it is possible to add package "vlan" to the DVD instalation images? >>> It is tiny package (36kB) and in some special environment (without

Re: suggestion to add package vlan to default instalation DVD

> it is possible to add package "vlan" to the DVD instalation images? > It is tiny package (36kB) and in some special environment (without > Internet with DVD in vmware environmen) i have to download and install > it manually. Hi Josef. In case you really need it, you can build you own live &

Re: suggestion to add package vlan to default instalation DVD

Josef Masek wrote: > it is possible to add package "vlan" to the DVD instalation images? > It is tiny package (36kB) and in some special environment (without > Internet with DVD in vmware environmen) i have to download and install > it manually. Why? The vlan package is not

Une suggestion de nouveau programme pour Debian 8

Mesdames, Messieurs, Si je peux me permettre d'émettre un souhait pour la prochaine version de la distribution Debian, ce serait l'intégration du programme de conception de films sur DVD (pour lecteur de dévédés de salon) bombono (voir http://www.bombono.org). Un cordial et grand

Re: Suggestion for the installer, when non-free firmwares are needed

On 27/01/15 19:19, Johannes Schauer wrote: Hi, Quoting Riley Baird (2015-01-27 04:01:20) That's a good idea. That being said, tarballs containing *all* of the firmware are already (unofficially) produced on a regular basis[1]. Perhaps an easier way of solving this problem would be to

Re: Suggestion for the installer, when non-free firmwares are needed

Hi, Quoting Riley Baird (2015-01-27 04:01:20) That's a good idea. That being said, tarballs containing *all* of the firmware are already (unofficially) produced on a regular basis[1]. Perhaps an easier way of solving this problem would be to have the installer tell the user where these

Re: Suggestion for the installer, when non-free firmwares are needed

, which I needed for the installation. Here’s a suggestion: Let the installer display a code, which the user can enter on debian.org - it then automatically shows you the needed files and let you download them instead of mentioning cryptic file names like rtl8168e-3.fw and so on. Here's

Suggestion for the installer, when non-free firmwares are needed

a suggestion: Let the installer display a code, which the user can enter on debian.org - it then automatically shows you the needed files and let you download them instead of mentioning cryptic file names like rtl8168e-3.fw and so on. Best greetings from Berlin Thanks, Stephan signature.asc

Re: Suggestion for the installer, when non-free firmwares are needed

connection for installation if you downloaded the full CD. Here’s a suggestion: Let the installer display a code, which the user can enter on debian.org - it then automatically shows you the needed files and let you download them instead of mentioning cryptic file names like rtl8168e-3.fw

Re: Bug#769907: A small suggestion on constructive engagement [Was, Re: Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail]

Octavio Alvarez: Question: is it safe to say that systemd doesn't yet support the full /etc/fstab specification from util-linux [1]? Yes; it's safe. It's also wrong. But it's quite safe. (-: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#769907: A small suggestion on constructive engagement [Was, Re: Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail]

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 01:45:55PM -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: On 19/11/14 21:32, Steve Langasek wrote: 1) the problem with new feature in systemd which considers all filesystems in fstab vital for system boot and stops boot if they fail. It's been decided that although it is a change in

Bug#769907: A small suggestion on constructive engagement [Was, Re: Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail]

On 19/11/14 21:32, Steve Langasek wrote: 1) the problem with new feature in systemd which considers all filesystems in fstab vital for system boot and stops boot if they fail. It's been decided that although it is a change in behaviour that might render some systems unbootable it's

Bug#769907: A small suggestion on constructive engagement [Was, Re: Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail]

Michal, On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:34:22AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: On 19 November 2014 08:02, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org wrote: Le mercredi, 19 novembre 2014, 00.00:48 Michal Suchanek a écrit : On 18 November 2014 18:57, Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org wrote: El dl 17 de 11

a stupid suggestion for dpkg?

Dear Debian Developers, May be this is the wrong place or my subject has been already discussed in different ways, but is it a crazy idea that a package provides kinds of pre- prerm and/or post- postinst scripts regarding package(s) that is(are) just recommended or suggested by it? So that those

Re: a stupid suggestion for dpkg?

Le Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 09:47:23PM +0200, Patrice Duroux a écrit : May be this is the wrong place or my subject has been already discussed in different ways, but is it a crazy idea that a package provides kinds of pre- prerm and/or post- postinst scripts regarding package(s) that is(are)

Suggestion about minor improvements to default bashrc

Hello, this is my first minor contribution to Debian, but as it's my Linux distribution of choise and the only one I chose to work with I have found minor improvements that perhaps can be of use. The first one I will mail about is so minor it might be uninteresting but as I spend so much time on

Re: Suggestion about minor improvements to default bashrc

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 06:19:02PM +0100, Simon Johnsson wrote: Hello, this is my first minor contribution to Debian, but as it's my Linux distribution of choise and the only one I chose to work with I have found minor improvements that perhaps can be of use. The first one I will mail about

Re: Suggestion about minor improvements to default bashrc

for trying to improve Debian. The .bashrc file in fresh user accounts is derived from /etc/skel/.bashrc, which is created by the base-files package. To make your suggestion, you would therefore report a bug with a severity wishlist against this package. This said, be prepared to be disappointed

Re: suggestion

Paul Wise, le Sun 28 Oct 2012 11:34:33 +0800, a écrit : On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: When somebody implements it. Someone already did: ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/tools/win32-loader/unstable/win32-loader.txt Wubi is not only about installing from windows, but

Re: suggestion

Ricardo Obando, le Fri 26 Oct 2012 21:29:37 -0300, a écrit : When will there be in debian installer for Debian and wubi as Ubuntu? When somebody implements it. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: suggestion

On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: When somebody implements it. Someone already did: ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/tools/win32-loader/unstable/win32-loader.txt -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

suggestion

When will there be in debian installer for Debian and wubi as Ubuntu? Attentively Ricardo Obando, from Chile.

Re: suggestion

Take a look: http://goodbye-microsoft.com/ Cheers! On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Ricardo Obando ricardo.kyu...@hotmail.comwrote: When will there be in debian installer for Debian and wubi as Ubuntu? Attentively Ricardo Obando, from Chile. -- William Vera | bi...@billy.mx Systems

Re: Feature suggestion: TCP-FIT congestion control

On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 04:06:36AM +0400, a...@mvpro.net wrote: I see, that Debian Wheezy comes with new congestion control named 'yeah', it's rather good innovation, but by my tests TCP-Fit congestion control should be the best for now. The question is not only one of finding the local

Feature suggestion: TCP-FIT congestion control

Hello. I see, that Debian Wheezy comes with new congestion control named 'yeah', it's rather good innovation, but by my tests TCP-Fit congestion control should be the best for now. More information about it you can get here: http://media.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn/~multimedia/tcp-fit/ It would be

Re: Feature suggestion: TCP-FIT congestion control

On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Alex wrote: I see, that Debian Wheezy comes with new congestion control named 'yeah', it's rather good innovation, but by my tests TCP-Fit congestion control should be the best for now. ... It would be perfect if you'll innovate this into Wheezy. Debian

Re: Some suggestion

2011/12/2 pei deng walleker...@gmail.com: I think debian should release  a publish version with roll updating as archlinux. and remove testing and sid version. because 'roll' is really a very good mechanism for software publish and test. And how would then Debian continue releasing stable?

Re: Some suggestion

2011/12/2 Игорь Пашев pashev.i...@gmail.com: +1. Also there is no much difference between unstable and testing. 2011/12/3 Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com so what is the difference, I am using unstable and it rolls mike Testing/Unstable/Experimental are kind-of rolling - it

Re: Some suggestion

On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 03:59:18 +0800, pei deng walleker...@gmail.com wrote: I think debian should release a publish version with roll updating as archlinux. and remove testing and sid version. Kindly try to understand how Debian's release process works before suggesting things. Greetings Marc --

Re: suggestion: build-blockers field in control file

[Russell Coker] Why not have software which wants to have the dependencies of a package look at the dependencies line as well as the build-dependencies? It seems to me that the package maintainers are already providing the necessary information and the people who maintain autobuilder

Some suggestion

I think debian should release a publish version with roll updating as archlinux. and remove testing and sid version. because 'roll' is really a very good mechanism for software publish and test. -- *Regards,* *Deng Pei* * * *Software Engineering Institute* *HP GDSCA CDC* *Fedora Project

Re: Some suggestion

so what is the difference, I am using unstable and it rolls mike On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:59 PM, pei deng walleker...@gmail.com wrote: I think debian should release  a publish version with roll updating as archlinux. and remove testing and sid version. because 'roll' is really a very good 

Re: Some suggestion

+1. Also there is no much difference between unstable and testing. 2011/12/3 Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com so what is the difference, I am using unstable and it rolls mike On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:59 PM, pei deng walleker...@gmail.com wrote: I think debian should release

Re: suggestion: build-blockers field in control file

* peter green plugw...@p10link.net, 2011-11-29, 19:23: Some packages have runtime dependencies on packages that they do not have corresponding build-dependencies for. This leads to the building of uninstallable packages which in turn leads to problems with testing transition of packages.

Re: suggestion: build-blockers field in control file

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, peter green plugw...@p10link.net wrote: Some packages have runtime dependencies on packages that they do not have corresponding build-dependencies for. This leads to the building of uninstallable packages which in turn leads to problems with testing transition of packages.

suggestion: build-blockers field in control file

Some packages have runtime dependencies on packages that they do not have corresponding build-dependencies for. This leads to the building of uninstallable packages which in turn leads to problems with testing transition of packages. Currently there are two workarounds for this situation 1:

Re: suggestion: build-blockers field in control file

peter green wrote: [...] This leads to the building of uninstallable packages which in turn leads to problems with testing transition of packages. Currently there are two workarounds for this situation 1: manually alter the package's architecture list to limit building to those

Re: Suggestion to remove (eventually) libtar from Debian

Magnus Holmgren holmg...@debian.org writes: libtar popped up on wnpp-alert, so I ITAd it, but now I'm having second thoughts. I've done one upload now though. - No new releases since 2003. Upstream hasn't bothered building a dynamic library, that's a Debian patch (and a corresponding patch

Suggestion to remove (eventually) libtar from Debian

libtar popped up on wnpp-alert, so I ITAd it, but now I'm having second thoughts. I've done one upload now though. - No new releases since 2003. Upstream hasn't bothered building a dynamic library, that's a Debian patch (and a corresponding patch in other distros). - libarchive is superior (I

Re: suggestion about debian devel extension

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:50 PM, j jj milkwa...@hotmail.com wrote:   The open source analysis website runs on free host space. So the storage and the performance are limited,  the website is also unstable.  Would you still  kindly sponsor  me a  domain ( osa.debian.net) ? I was going to add

RE: suggestion about debian devel extension

hold your breath :)     :( best wishes, j Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:53:09 +0800 Subject: Re: suggestion about debian devel extension From: p...@debian.org To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:50 PM, j jj wrote

RE: suggestion about debian devel extension

soon, and I will try my best to make it better. Keep going! best wishes J Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 10:23:08 +0800 Subject: Re: suggestion about debian devel extension From: p...@debian.org To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:57 AM

Suggestion for new virtual package: httpd-wsgi

Hi there, I would like to suggest a new virtual package, httpd-wsgi. I'm currently in the process of packaging a Pylons-based web-application that uses wsgi and instead of manually keeping / updating a list of all possible implementations (eg. libapache2-mod-wsgi) it would be very nice if I (and

RE: suggestion about debian devel extension

positiion of  the same file. best wishes, milkway_3     Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 00:25:34 -0400 From: ashe...@asheesh.org To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: suggestion about debian devel extension On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, milkwa...@hotmail.com wrote

Re: suggestion about debian devel extension

On 07/07/2010 03:51 AM, j jj wrote: Dear Asheesh. It is very glad to disscuss with you. That looks pretty cool! What do you mean by put it under debian? I want to host the website under debian. Because the number of packages in debian is huge, it is beyond my capibility to

RE: suggestion about debian devel extension

: suggestion about debian devel extension On 07/07/2010 03:51 AM, j jj wrote: Dear Asheesh. It is very glad to disscuss with you. That looks pretty cool! What do you mean by put it under debian? I want to host the website under debian. Because the number of packages in debian is huge

Re: suggestion about debian devel extension

Do you mean at debian.org? [j jj] Is there any difference between debian and debian.org? The ultimate goal is benefits all developers. You could have meant several things: 1) Maybe you wanted to have your software packaged and available on Debian mirrors, so developers everywhere could

RE: suggestion about debian devel extension

You are very smart! Could you or somebody else give me the yes/no answer for the 5 methods?  If it depends, depends what? Thanks! Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 19:57:31 -0500 From: pe...@p12n.org To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: suggestion

Re: suggestion about debian devel extension

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote: 1) Maybe you wanted to have your software packaged and available on Debian mirrors, so developers everywhere could install it to cross-reference their codebases, for local use or for a corporate intranet.  (Do people still

suggestion about debian devel extension

As a programmer under debian, I really appriciate the rich debian packages. However, it is not convenient to read and analysis source code, even with emacs and scsope. A litte progress has been acheived after fighting for years. You can test it at http://jp.hostesr.com/. For benefit of all

Re: suggestion about debian devel extension

On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, milkwa...@hotmail.com wrote: As a programmer under debian, I really appriciate the rich debian packages. However, it is not convenient to read and analysis source code, even with emacs and scsope. A litte progress has been acheived after fighting for years. You can

Re: Suggestion to developer tools

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:04:08PM -0500, ceduardo wrote: 2010/3/25 Brian Ryans brian.l.ry...@gmail.com: Quoting ceduardo on 2010-03-18 17:32:27: What Do you developer tools sugges? If you use emacs for editing try its integration with gdb for debugging. I like it. As a way to manage your

Re: Suggestion to developer tools

On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:32:27 +0100, ceduardo carlos.eduardo.vir...@gmail.com wrote: Hi every body, thaks you for your suggestions. Well I am learning about C, C++ and Linux programing, jeje I am trying to be a Debian developer this is my objetive. On my practices use emacs and others tools

Re: Suggestion to developer tools

Quoting ceduardo on 2010-03-18 17:32:27: What Do you developer tools sugges? Not a piece of software proper, but I, too, am learning programming and have found the book The Art of Unix Programming by Eric S. Raymond to be quite invaluable. I don't have an ISBN, as I have the PDF version, but a

Re: Suggestion to developer tools

2010/3/25 Brian Ryans brian.l.ry...@gmail.com: Quoting ceduardo on 2010-03-18 17:32:27: What Do you developer tools sugges? Not a piece of software proper, but I, too, am learning programming and have found the book The Art of Unix Programming by Eric S. Raymond to be quite invaluable. I

Re: Suggestion to developer tools

You mistakenly replied to me instead of to the list. I'll fix that. Quoting ceduardo on 2010-03-26 17:04:08: Thanks, this more information to my objetive. I am from Colombia, my native language is spanish. I don't know why I said Portuguese instead of Spanish. Brain fart on my part, likely.

Re: Suggestion to developer tools

ceduardo wrote: The powerfull, vi, vim, gcc, g++, gdb and the others that I don't know in this moment. Every C and C++ programmer should use Valgrind, often. Static analysis tools like cppcheck and flawfinder are also useful. All of these tools are available in debian main. Erik --

Suggestion to developer tools

Hi every body, thaks you for your suggestions. Well I am learning about C, C++ and Linux programing, jeje I am trying to be a Debian developer this is my objetive. On my practices use emacs and others tools from console. What Do you developer tools sugges? Thanks PD: I sorry but my english is

Re: Suggestion to developer tools

Hi Carlos. Excerpts from ceduardo's message of Qui Mar 18 19:32:27 -0300 2010: (...) Well I am learning about C, C++ and Linux programing, jeje I am trying to be a Debian developer this is my objetive. On my practices use emacs and others tools from console. What Do you developer tools

Re: Suggestion to developer tools

On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 17:32 -0500, ceduardo wrote: Hi every body, thaks you for your suggestions. Well I am learning about C, C++ and Linux programing, jeje I am trying to be a Debian developer this is my objetive. On my practices use emacs and others tools from console. What Do you

Re: Suggestion to developer tools

2010/3/18 Luke Cycon lcy...@gmail.com: On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 17:32 -0500, ceduardo wrote: Hi every body, thaks you for your suggestions. Well I am learning about C, C++ and Linux programing, jeje I am trying to be a Debian developer this is my objetive. On my practices use emacs and others

Re: Suggestion to developer tools

On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 22:12 -0500, ceduardo wrote: I wanted to know aobut the typicals develoment toolt that you use. I mainly use eclipse or gedit or a command line text editor (Depending on my mood) I suggest you learn how to use these as well, they allow for much customization. I have

Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Kartik Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have seen that many packages are rejected from NEW [1] due to either licensing or poor packaging and we know the reasons [2] too. It will be very helpful if Rejection is also mailed to ITP (where it apply) so, that

Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:10:38PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: It will be very helpful if Rejection is also mailed to ITP (where it apply) so, that anyone can look at actual reason and fix problem (packaging, contacting upstream for license issues etc). Fine. If you - get a

Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug

Hi, Kartik Mistry wrote: I have seen that many packages are rejected from NEW [1] due to either licensing or poor packaging and we know the reasons [2] too. It will be very helpful if Rejection is also mailed to ITP (where it apply) so, that anyone can look at actual reason and fix problem

Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug

Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [1] sane does not mean - assume that every uploader does it right and closes ITPs in changelog (or even mention them), - parsing wnpp bug data everytime How about BCC'ing the reject mail to a mailing list with a public, web-browsable

Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about BCC'ing the reject mail to a mailing list with a public, web-browsable archive? Yes, even publicly available report is also fine. -- Cheers, Kartik Mistry | 0xD1028C8D | IRC: kart_ Homepage:

  1   2   3   >