]] Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi,
| On 2011-04-27 20:14, Adam Borowski wrote:
| First, this statement is not true because other package managers
| exist.
|
| You mean, one could manually hunt down and locate a .deb file, wget
| then feed it to dpkg?
|
| Well, yes, one can. I did it once in
Thank you for submitting your letter for publication. It will be considered in
due course.
John Lee,
Letters Editor,
South China Morning Post
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:58:46PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Funny… reading your recent blogpost,
(FWIW, the blog post Mehdi is referring to is, I guess, at [1])
you seem to not understand yet what you want to put into Rolling (and
how). So, how can we comment on something that's not set or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
* Package name: xen-qemu-dm-4.1
Version : 4.1.0
Upstream Author : Fabrice Bellard, Xen team, and others
xen-de...@lists.xensource.com
* URL : http://www.xen.org/
* License : BSD, GPL, GPL
On Mi, 2011-04-27 at 19:34 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Hi,
On 2011-04-27 14:53, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
I hereby request comments on changing APT to pre-depend on
${shlibs:Depends}.
When we upload a new version of APT, depending on a newer
library version
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:18:05 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
We do count situations like
http://lists.debian.org/deity/2011/04/msg00154.html
676992.81078...@web26502.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
That seems silly. They broke their system using dpkg -i, they can fix
it with dpkg -i.
Cheers,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:20:00 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
This is an updated package for version 4.1 of Xen.
Updated packages don't need ITPs.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Do, 2011-04-28 at 09:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:18:05 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
We do count situations like
http://lists.debian.org/deity/2011/04/msg00154.html
676992.81078...@web26502.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
That seems silly. They broke their
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller steffen_moel...@gmx.de
* Package name: libscythestat
Version : 1.0.2
* URL : http://scythe.wustl.edu/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Scythe Statistical C++ Library
From their
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:30:05AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com writes:
Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to
bother. Seems like a waste
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
We might disagree with the process Raphael is proposing, but my reading
of [1] is that he is asking for comments on the *goals* that, in his
opinion, rolling is supposed to fulfill. We can discuss whether those
goals are worthwhile or not even if
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Do, 2011-04-28 at 09:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:18:05 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
We do count situations like
http://lists.debian.org/deity/2011/04/msg00154.html
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 at 11:29:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
- at freeze time, instead of freezing rolling, we make a snapshot of
rolling (I call it testing) and this is where we do the work left
to make it ready for release
So your testing is essentially the pre-2000 frozen distribution
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
- testing is really a temporary distribution that has a purpose only
during freeze, if you use testing when there's no freeze you're
just using stable because the testing symlink is still pointing
to the distribution that has been released now
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 20:46, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
Also, what if apt wants to call one of its auxilliary binaries during
the install/upgrade? I imagine it's not implemented that way _now_,
but a Pre-Depends would make such a thing a lot safer if they want it.
In theory this
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 04:55, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
As discussed elsewhere in this thread, anyone relying on apt for
upgrades would be using apt to upgrade apt, so an alternative to
consider would be making apt fake the pre-depends internally.
Is it feasible for apt to fake
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 at 11:29:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
- at freeze time, instead of freezing rolling, we make a snapshot of
rolling (I call it testing) and this is where we do the work left
to make it ready for release
So your testing
On 2011-04-28, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
Might be, except that I don't want to keep the name testing due
to its connotation that doesn't reflect well the goal of something
that's constantly usable.
Oh it is mostly constantly usable. Yes, sometimes an arch has to suffer but I
On 28/04/2011 11:48, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 at 11:29:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
- at freeze time, instead of freezing rolling, we make a snapshot of
rolling (I call it testing) and this is where we do the work left
to make it ready for release
So your testing is
On 28/04/2011 09:06, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:58:46PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Funny… reading your recent blogpost,
(FWIW, the blog post Mehdi is referring to is, I guess, at [1])
you seem to not understand yet what you want to put into Rolling (and
how). So,
On 28/04/2011 12:03, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 at 11:29:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
- at freeze time, instead of freezing rolling, we make a snapshot of
rolling (I call it testing) and this is where we do the work left
to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
* Package name: glance
Version : 2011.2
Upstream Author : Openstack maintainers openst...@lists.launchpad.net
* URL : http://www.openstack.org/
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang:
Dear Friends,
A New Article Site launched In the Market and approve its article in just 24
Hours.
Have a Look
http://www.articlesubmissionssite.com/
--
Thanks Regards,
Aman Bhatia
Search Engine Optimizer
Apollo Munich Health Insurance
Hi,
thank you all for your feedback!
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
So your testing is essentially the pre-2000 frozen distribution [1], and
your rolling is basically the current testing without the need to
freeze?
If that's the case, calling the distributions
On 28/04/11 at 13:10 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 28/04/2011 12:03, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Might be, except that I don't want to keep the name testing due
to its connotation that doesn't reflect well the goal of something
that's constantly usable.
Except that it's lying to our users
On 28/04/2011 11:29, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
For example: What would be Rolling's content right after a release?
(comparing to testing, which starts from the stable just released).
I
Rolling doesn't magically change after a release. It's still the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
* Package name: raxml
Version : 7.2.6
Upstream Author : Alexandros Stamatakis alexandros.stamata...@epfl.ch
* URL : http://wwwkramer.in.tum.de/exelixis/software.html
* License : GPL
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:30:05AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com writes:
Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to
bother. Seems like a waste of time to me. If I were going
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Apr 27, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:20:55PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
The reason is that the kind of entities which require FIPS 140 probably
also tend to require corporate vendor support, which we do not
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
libgcrypt has some horrendous bugs which upstream refuse to fix,
for example the broken behaviour relating to setuid binaries
discussed previously here, and the hard coded behaviour
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 13:01 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 28/04/2011 11:48, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 at 11:29:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
- at freeze time, instead of freezing rolling, we make a snapshot of
rolling (I call it testing) and this is where we do the
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
| before| during | release
| freeze| freeze | day+1
| dev period | |
———
|sid |sid |sid
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Adrian von Bidder, the maintainer of the libtext-levenshteinxs-perl
package unfortunately died on 17th of April 2011 [1].
[1] http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110423
Therefore, I orphan this package now. If you want to be the new
maintainer, please take it.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Adrian von Bidder, the maintainer of the libxml-dtdparser-perl package
unfortunately died on 17th of April 2011 [1].
[1] http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110423
Therefore, I orphan this package now. If you want to be the new
maintainer, please take it.
See
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Adrian von Bidder, the maintainer of the libxml-writer-simple-perl
package unfortunately died on 17th of April 2011 [1].
[1] http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110423
Therefore, I orphan this package now. If you want to be the new
maintainer, please take it.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Adrian von Bidder, the maintainer of the webkitkde package unfortunately
died on 17th of April 2011 [1].
[1] http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110423
Therefore, I orphan this package now. If you want to be the new
maintainer, please take it.
See
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:10:54PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Except that it's lying to our users to name it rolling because packages
from rolling won't be rc-bug free. For this reason, I think that testing
is a very well choosen name, more honest about its state. If people think
that testing
On 28/04/11 at 15:12 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
How's rolling different from testing? (except that testing freezes
from time to time… yes, I know, that's the main point of the proposal,
but still, I want to know if there are other changes).
Note that being frozen about 25% of the time is a
On 28/04/11 at 15:04 +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 13:01 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 28/04/2011 11:48, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 at 11:29:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
- at freeze time, instead of freezing rolling, we make a snapshot of
On 28/04/2011 15:52, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
| before| during | release | freeze| freeze
| day+1 | dev period | |
——— |sid
|sid |
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:11:14PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Uoti Urpala wrote:
...
It is still not a good reason to waste part of a draconian 30 chars of space
with hash information.
I agree.
Anyway, I think 30 should be the absolute upper limit for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephan Gerhard deb...@unidesign.ch
* Package name: cfflib
Version : 2.0.2
Upstream Author : Stephan Gerhard deb...@unidesign.ch
* URL : http://cmtk.org/cfflib
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:56:24PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:20:33AM +0900, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
New URLs:
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/index.en.html (this is the same)
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/modify.en.html#quiltrc
Hello
On 28/04/11 at 16:52 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 28/04/2011 15:52, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
| before| during | release | freeze| freeze
| day+1 | dev period | |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
1) At the beginning of the developement cycle, (with the new plan) you
start from testing, and not the new stable. So, you don't start with a
base that's rc-bug free, or at least, as polished as the new stable is.
First, the beginning of the development
On 28/04/2011 17:30, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
See
http://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/04/28/no-freeze-of-debian-development-what-does-it-entail/
for a more detailed answer and related suggestions to limit this problem.
I'm still reading and thinking… so, don't have an answer yet. But, it
you'd
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:37:37AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
So, could we document we different pitfall of crypto library on the
debian wiki ?
You could use http://curl.haxx.se/docs/ssl-compared.html
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_TLS_Implementations
as starting points.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:46:50PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Eugene V. Lyubimkin]
Second, why the APT's ability to upgrade is broken under these
conditions? Unless I'm missing something, the upgrade cannot be
started in the middle of another upgrade [1].
[1] If we count the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Carmona vinc4...@gmail.com
* Package name: ruby-taglib2
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Vincent Carmona vinc4...@gmail.com
* URL : http://zik.rubyforge.org/ruby-taglib2/
* License : GPL (v2+)
Programming
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:53:26PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Hi,
I hereby request comments on changing APT to pre-depend on
${shlibs:Depends}. The reason is simple:
When we upload a new version of APT, depending on a newer
library version (due to new symbols,
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
There are other issues I want to mention here (you may judge them as
minor, but let's see):
1) At the beginning of the developement cycle, (with the new plan) you
start from testing, and not the new stable. So, you don't start with a
base that's rc-bug free, or at least,
On 28/04/2011 17:25, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 28/04/11 at 16:52 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
1) At the beginning of the developement cycle, (with the new plan) you
start from testing, and not the new stable. So, you don't start with a
base that's rc-bug free, or at least, as polished as the new
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
There are other possible changes but I want to discuss them separately
because even without those changes, the testing without freeze is a
worthwhile goal in itself.
Still, since you seem to insist, here are ideas I'd like to investigate:
- reduce the set of
On 28/04/2011 17:30, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
1) At the beginning of the developement cycle, (with the new plan) you
start from testing, and not the new stable. So, you don't start with a
base that's rc-bug free, or at least, as polished as the new stable
On Do, 2011-04-28 at 08:41 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:46:50PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Eugene V. Lyubimkin]
Second, why the APT's ability to upgrade is broken under these
conditions? Unless I'm missing something, the upgrade cannot be
started in the
Osamu Aoki dijo [Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:55:48PM +0900]:
(...)
1.2.10~YYMMDD for prerelease of version 1.2.10
1.2.10~rcYMMDD for prerelease of version 1.2.10 (alternative format)
this last 2 are mostly used in unstable/testing only. So length is
less of problem.
Remember that
Joey,
nice to see you agreeing. :)
On 2011-04-28, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org wrote:
To most users of testing, a 5 month period when it doesn't update as
much, but is also more constantly usable is mostly a draw; that period
is when testing has the most new users.
That's also my observation.
On 28/04/11 at 18:04 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 28/04/2011 17:25, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 28/04/11 at 16:52 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
1) At the beginning of the developement cycle, (with the new plan) you
start from testing, and not the new stable. So, you don't start with a
base
On 28/04/11 at 12:05 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
And at the same time, having a non-frozen rolling release available
during freeze time could easily distract people from working on
testing/frozen at all, because a shiny rolling release that they and
some users can use is still available. I am
On 28/04/11 at 18:54 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
You want a constantly usable testing, but are you working these days on
fixing RC bugs affecting testing? Don't get me wrong. I'm not
finger-printing. I didn't find time to do that myself. But, if we all try
to do that, things will be much more
* Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net [110428 20:21]:
On 28/04/11 at 12:05 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
And at the same time, having a non-frozen rolling release available
during freeze time could easily distract people from working on
testing/frozen at all, because a shiny rolling release
- This mail is a HTML mail. Not all elements could be shown in plain text
mode. -
Cliente : debian-devel@lists.debian.org
O Santander - Van GOGH
Tem uma mensagem pra Você!
MENSAGEMSANTANDER-VANGOGH.htm
Description: Binary data
Hi guys,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:23:33PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
* RM's can still choose to migrate packages from (not frozen) testing as
long as it's practical to do so.
* When deps/transitions/etc prevent testing migration, release N
proposed updates is used for
Philipp Kern wrote:
Improvement to update testing more quickly by easing the pain of
transitions, like rebuilding everything in a self-contained way
to avoid entanglements, would be well appreciated.
As it's not the first time I see this mentionned (but still fail to
understand it fully),
On 28/04/11 at 20:45 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net [110428 20:21]:
On 28/04/11 at 12:05 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
And at the same time, having a non-frozen rolling release available
during freeze time could easily distract people from working on
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, sean finney wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Good. I just want to point out that frozen built on top on rolling
(which is what we're proposing here) is different from frozen built on
top of unstable (which is what we had before the
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Joey Hess wrote:
Another problem is that testing can be frozen in stages, which allows
development from unstable on eg, leaf package to continue on filter into
testing until relatively close to the release. Rolling could disrupt
that, since uploads to unstable targeted at
On Thu, April 28, 2011 19:03, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 28/04/11 at 12:05 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
And at the same time, having a non-frozen rolling release available
during freeze time could easily distract people from working on
testing/frozen at all, because a shiny rolling release that they
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by
* Package name: tnat64
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/andrew_shadoura/tnat64/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh hmh at debian.org writes:
I do think you misunderstood my point in the hash issue. My point is not
that a full hash will not collide. The point is that the full hash as seen
in a tree received from the upstream DVCS should not see colisions, because
the collision
On 04/28/2011 07:15 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Could we try to stay on focus and constructive, and avoid bringing
poneys in the discussion?
Yes. I'm sorry! I always write a first stupid version and then change it to
something reasonable (or drop it), but I forgot to change that sentence.
It
On 2011-04-28, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
But I don't plan to work on any of those if the project does not agree to
promote testing to something that can be advertised as usable by end-users
and as something that we strive to support on a best-effort basis.
The usual troll of
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:55:01 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
At least if
they're wired up to at least get announcements if something's screwing
up systems gravely. That channel seems to be missing, though.
apt-listbugs?
Not very widely known, IME ...
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:54:32 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
You want a constantly usable testing, but are you working these days on
fixing RC bugs affecting testing? Don't get me wrong. I'm not
finger-printing. I didn't find time to do that myself. But, if we all try
to do that, things will be
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:16:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, sean finney wrote:
If the latter case, I think the best thing to do would be to formalize
the proposal (DEP maybe?), set up the test archives/autobuilds, and get
right to it.
I'd be glad to help you drive a
On 04/29/2011 01:02 AM, Niccolò Belli wrote:
Il 28/04/2011 16:55, Thomas Goirand ha scritto:
Bastian, I just saw you did an upload, does this include the above fix
(eg, inclusion of xentoollog.h)? Should I write a bug report?
I fear you wasted your time trying to fix qemu-dm :|
Not
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes:
On 28/04/11 at 18:04 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
I agree that it's a problem. However:
- we are likely to get more rolling+unstable users than the current
testing+sid users, so rolling release will get more testing
until the freeze.
BB == Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
BB Before demanding private information from others, you could fix your MUA
BB to include a name of your own.
Well you could first help by not using a Blank surname!
:-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:17:29 -0400
Source: fluxbox
Binary: fluxbox
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.1~dfsg1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org
Changed-By: Paul Tagliamonte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:53:14 +0800
Source: gtkmm2.4
Binary: libgtkmm-2.4-dev libgtkmm-2.4-1c2a libgtkmm-2.4-dbg libgtkmm-2.4-doc
Architecture: source all mipsel
Version: 1:2.24.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Deng
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:13:52 -0600
Source: libdata-alias-perl
Binary: libdata-alias-perl
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:27:11 +0200
Source: biomaj
Binary: biomaj
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team
debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:33:56 +0200
Source: boinc
Binary: boinc boinc-client boinc-manager boinc-dev boinc-server-maker boinc-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 6.12.26+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:49:16 +0200
Source: golang
Binary: golang-go golang-src golang-doc golang-tools golang-mode
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2011.04.13-2~exp6
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ondřej Surý
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:20:34 +0200
Source: gst-plugins-bad0.10
Binary: gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad-doc gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad
gstreamer0.10-sdl gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.10.21.3-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:52:33 +0200
Source: mysqltcl
Binary: mysqltcl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.05-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Hoexter hoex...@debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Hoexter hoex...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:09:35 +0800
Source: picolisp
Binary: picolisp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.0.6.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kan-Ru Chen kos...@debian.org
Changed-By: Kan-Ru Chen kos...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:53:35 +0300
Source: polkit-qt-1
Binary: libpolkit-qt-1-dev libpolkit-qt-1-1
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.99.0-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:00:00 +0200
Source: resolvconf
Binary: resolvconf
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.50
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: resolvconf maintainers resolvconf-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:33:25 +0200
Source: swami
Binary: swami libswami0 libswami-dev swami-dbg
Architecture: source kfreebsd-i386 all
Version: 2.0.0+svn384-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:12:30 +0200
Source: osc
Binary: osc
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.131-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org
Changed-By: Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:03:46 +0100
Source: cmip5-cmor-tables
Binary: cmip5-cmor-tables
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry mckins...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:32:37 +0200
Source: mpfr4
Binary: libmpfr4 libmpfr4-dbg libmpfr-dev libmpfr-doc lib32mpfr4 lib32mpfr-dev
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Laurent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:19:48 +0100
Source: cmor
Binary: libcmor2 libcmor-dev python-cmor
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.5.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry mckins...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:05:06 +0200
Source: lighttpd
Binary: lighttpd lighttpd-doc lighttpd-mod-mysql-vhost
lighttpd-mod-trigger-b4-dl lighttpd-mod-cml lighttpd-mod-magnet
lighttpd-mod-webdav
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:08:27 +0200
Source: blepvco
Binary: blepvco
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:49:37 +
Source: exif
Binary: exif
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6.20-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian PhotoTools Maintainers
pkg-phototools-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:26:28 +0200
Source: keysafe
Binary: keysafe
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Alessio Treglia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:49:54 +0200
Source: dcap
Binary: dcap libdcap1 dcap-dev dcap-tunnel-gsi dcap-tunnel-krb dcap-tunnel-ssl
dcap-tunnel-telnet
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.47.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:26:35 +0200
Source: lftp
Binary: lftp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Noèl Köthe n...@debian.org
Changed-By: Noèl Köthe n...@debian.org
Description:
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
