Whether remotely running software is considered "software" for Debian.

Note: this post is not about certspotter at all, so I'm not Cc'ing the bug and changed the Subject line. On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:30:19PM -0400, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Stuff like s3cmd are tools connecting to cloud services. Arguably > usable to have tools to free data from the clouds. Whi

Bug#871913: ITP: boot-clj -- Build tooling for Clojure

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tom Marble * Package name: boot-clj Version : 2.7.1 Upstream Author : Alan Dipert * URL : https://github.com/boot-clj/boot * License : EPL Programming Lang: Java Description : Build tooling for Clojure Boot is a

Re: OpenSSL disables TLS 1.0 and 1.1

]] Russ Allbery > That doesn't mean we can't make it very easy to disable TLS 1.0/1.1 or > encourage people to do that when possible, of course. It would be great > for us to try to lead the way and push things forward a bit. But I think > we're still going to have to make it very easy to enabl

Re: OpenSSL disables TLS 1.0 and 1.1

On 08/12/2017 02:16 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > While I think we might want to ship buster with TLS 1.0 available, I > think running with it disabled for parts of the development cycle is > very useful, since it exposes bugs we have in packages that will use > that version out of the box (isync be

Re: Whether remotely running software is considered "software" for Debian.

Hi, On 12.08.2017 09:19, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote: > (Note: I'm not saying s3cmd must be in contrib. It can work with free > servers, > so it can be in main.) It can be in main as soon as a free server exists, I think. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#871926: ITP: octave-octproj -- cartographic projections transformations for Octave

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Rafael Laboissiere * Package name: octave-octproj Version : 1.1.5 Upstream Author : José Luis García Pallero * URL : https://octave.sourceforge.io/octproj/index.html * License : GPLv3+ Programming Lang: C++, Octave

Bug#871928: ITP: caja-rename -- Batch renaming extension for Caja

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Gabriel * Package name: caja-rename Version : 17.3.28 Upstream Author : Robert Tari * URL : https://tari.in/www/software/cajarename/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python Description : Batch renaming exte

Re: Whether remotely running software is considered "software" for Debian.

On 2017-08-12 17:51:49 +0200 (+0200), Simon Richter wrote: > On 12.08.2017 09:19, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote: > > (Note: I'm not saying s3cmd must be in contrib. It can work with > > free servers, so it can be in main.) > > It can be in main as soon as a free server exists, I think. Not that I've perso

what should I do if I want to adopt one orphaned package?

Dear all, I want to adopt one package - Bochs [bochs: IA-32 PC emulator (package info)] which is orphaned since 2011 days. And the current version in sid is 2.6-5. The official website shows that the latest version o

Re: Whether remotely running software is considered "software" for Debian.

On Aug 12, "Dr. Bas Wijnen" wrote: > Which would be a great example of software that is free interacting with > software that is non-free. Thus the package with this as its main purpose > should live in contrib. There's nothing wrong with that. There is no such requirement for Debian packages a

Proposal: A new approach to differential debs

Hi everyone, (I CCed -devel and deity, but we probably should just discuss that on -dpkg) while breakfast here at DebConf, the topic of delta upgrades came up. I think delta debs are generally a thing we should aim to have, but debdelta is not the implementation we want: * It is not integrated