Re: "the" cloud [Integration with systemd]

2019-11-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/1/19 9:21 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> However, there are only a few 
> really large public cloud providers and most of them are US companies.

I would count at least OVH as a "really large public cloud provider",
yet they aren't originally from the US. There's also countless small
OpenStack public clouds out there.

> I see that some see this as a good trend… but for me a cloud is… if not 
> hosted by myself just the computer of somebody else who may or may not 
> have my interest in mind. I am still trusting some others with hosting 
> stuff for me, as many will do. For example my employer, regarding the 
> mail server that will send this. Or disroot.org for example for 
> Nextcloud storage. And another similar supplier for backup mail account. 
> I donated to both of them.

There are many hosting models: renting shared hosting, a virtual
machine, a dedicated server, a few U in a rack, a full rack, or owning
your own data center. This is a business issue, not a free software /
vendor lock-in problem.

What I've been trying to tell for years, is that this problematic didn't
change with the cloud. Using someone else's cloud isn't a problem in
itself, if at least, the underlying technology is free software and you
can set it up by yourself, on permise, and if you make sure you can
easily move on to another provider (or to a self-hosted solution).

So, to sum-up: do not fear "the" cloud, fear closed source proprietary
solutions that lock you in, and use only free software, well known
implementations of IaaS.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)



Re: "the" cloud [Integration with systemd]

2019-11-01 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hi Thomas,

Thomas Goirand - 01.11.19, 01:26:58 CET:
> On 10/31/19 5:13 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > It is similar with "the" cloud.
> 
> Why is there quotes around "the", and why do you think there's only a
> single instance of a cloud out there?

Well exactly for the reason that there is no single cloud, yet people 
keep talking about it as if there were. However, there are only a few 
really large public cloud providers and most of them are US companies.
 
> > Yet, there are attempts to disrupt the cloud already by making
> > machines powerful enough that they do not need a centralized cloud
> > provider even if storing a huge lot of data.
> 
> We must be living in very different worlds... in mine, there's no such
> thing as "a centralized cloud provider", and it's cheaper to deploy
> your own cloud on top of Debian. It's also still impossible to store

In my private world there is not, either. However, I see it at work. An 
increasing pressure to use and learn to use public cloud providers like 
Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Alibaba. I found and made myself a niche that 
allows me to evade this trend mostly.

> dozens of petabytes in a single compute (if you have such hardware
> available, please give me a link to the vendor), and I'm not yet
> scratching topics such as automation, high availability and
> scalability.

Such hardware is still in development and I do not know how long it may 
take or whether they will succeed, but I was referring to HP's "The 
Machine". The team behind this specifically intends to reverse the 
pressure to store a huge lot of data with public cloud providers.

> Besides this, I completely miss the point that you're trying to make,
> and how this is related to init systems... :)

It was more of a side note: Regarding adoption of public cloud as well 
as features of Systemd I see a kind of a pressure to do so. Cause if you 
didn't others would outrun you. That was the similarity I intended to 
point out.

I see that some see this as a good trend… but for me a cloud is… if not 
hosted by myself just the computer of somebody else who may or may not 
have my interest in mind. I am still trusting some others with hosting 
stuff for me, as many will do. For example my employer, regarding the 
mail server that will send this. Or disroot.org for example for 
Nextcloud storage. And another similar supplier for backup mail account. 
I donated to both of them.

Also I see that for Systemd some see it as a good trend. I do not. And 
in the end it is not about good or bad, or right or wrong, but just 
about different ways to see things. None of them are necessarily right or 
wrong, they are just different. And I like to have a choice in the future 
as well and I am ready to stand up for that choice.

Thanks,
-- 
Martin




Re: "the" cloud [Integration with systemd]

2019-10-31 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi Martin!

On 10/31/19 5:13 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> It is similar with "the" cloud.

Why is there quotes around "the", and why do you think there's only a
single instance of a cloud out there?

> Yet, there are attempts to disrupt the cloud already by making
> machines powerful enough that they do not need a centralized cloud
> provider even if storing a huge lot of data.

We must be living in very different worlds... in mine, there's no such
thing as "a centralized cloud provider", and it's cheaper to deploy your
own cloud on top of Debian. It's also still impossible to store dozens
of petabytes in a single compute (if you have such hardware available,
please give me a link to the vendor), and I'm not yet scratching topics
such as automation, high availability and scalability.

Besides this, I completely miss the point that you're trying to make,
and how this is related to init systems... :)

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)