Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

On 12/20/2015 12:26 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > As of today, dak supports the dbgsym packages built by debhelper and > with debhelper/9.20151219 they are now built by default! With this, a > decade old idea is now implemented and available for general > consumption[1]. :) > > * A huge

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, Robert Edmonds wrote: > Are the *-debug suites going to stay in a separate repository? If so, > is a separate mirror network being set up? I help maintain a public > mirror of the 'debian' repository, and if possible I'd like to setup a > mirror of the 'debian-debug'

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

Anthony DeRobertis: > Are there plans to teach httpredir.debian.org about the new debug mirror > network? > > http://httpredir.debian.org/debian-debug/dists/unstable-debug/main/binary-amd64/Release > is currently 404. > Thanks for the suggestion. I have filed a request for it in [1] - patches

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

Are there plans to teach httpredir.debian.org about the new debug mirror network? http://httpredir.debian.org/debian-debug/dists/unstable-debug/main/binary-amd64/Release is currently 404.

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > > Will this eventually replace all the existing -dbg packages? > > That is the plan, yes. > > > And will this eventually become part of normal unstable/testing/etc. > > and mirrors, or is it intended that

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

Vincent Bernat writes: > For experimental, would it be possible to set "Not-Automatic: yes", so > that debug packages work in the same way than regular packages? Thanks! This will happen with the next dinstall run. Ansgar

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

Hi a big thank you for all invovled implementhing this feature! On 2015-12-19 23:26:09, Niels Thykier wrote: > * You /can/ migrate your manual "-dbg" package to a "-dbgsym" >- if/when it has no reverse (build-)depends. >- it just requires you to replace "--dbg-package=pkg-dbg" with >

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, > So how will we deal with the migration from -dbg to -dbgsym for > jessie -> stretch? > > * Should we keep transitional -dbg packages around even if the > -dbgsym packages are in another archive? > > * Are we going to tell people in the

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

Bernd Zeimetz: > Hi, > Hi, >> So how will we deal with the migration from -dbg to -dbgsym for >> jessie -> stretch? >> >> * Should we keep transitional -dbg packages around even if the >> -dbgsym packages are in another archive? >> To be honest, I do not think this will make sense/work (for

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

On 12/20/2015 02:13 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 20.12.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Niels Thykier: >> Hi, >> >> As of today, dak supports the dbgsym packages built by debhelper and >> with debhelper/9.20151219 they are now built by default! > > This is awesome. > Huge thanks to everyone involved.

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Will this eventually replace all the existing -dbg packages? That is the plan, yes. > And will this eventually become part of normal unstable/testing/etc. > and mirrors, or is it intended that people really always add e.g. >

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

❦ 19 décembre 2015 23:26 GMT, Niels Thykier  : > As of today, dak supports the dbgsym packages built by debhelper and > with debhelper/9.20151219 they are now built by default! With this, a > decade old idea is now implemented and available for general > consumption[1]. :)

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 23:26 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > As of today, dak supports the dbgsym packages built by debhelper and > with debhelper/9.20151219 they are now built by default! Awesome, thx to all. Will this eventually replace all the existing -dbg packages? > deb

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

❦ 19 décembre 2015 23:26 GMT, Niels Thykier  : > * Currently only experimental and unstable will have dbgsym packages. >- We need changes to Britney to add them to testing. For experimental, would it be possible to set "Not-Automatic: yes", so that debug packages work in

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Hmm when people then have a lot suites, like stable, stable-updates, > stable-proposed updates, *-backports... that will quit blow up > sources.lists when in principle they'd need to add according *-debug > lines for each. Not

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

Am 20.12.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Niels Thykier: > Hi, > > As of today, dak supports the dbgsym packages built by debhelper and > with debhelper/9.20151219 they are now built by default! With this, a > decade old idea is now implemented and available for general > consumption[1]. :) Chapeau to you

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

Am 20.12.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Niels Thykier: > Hi, > > As of today, dak supports the dbgsym packages built by debhelper and > with debhelper/9.20151219 they are now built by default! This is awesome. Huge thanks to everyone involved. That's a nice, early christmas present! Regards, Michael --

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

On Sun, 2015-12-20 at 10:57 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > Last but not least, what about security support? > None of the suites available on it (unstable/experimental) recieve > security updates. Sure, but I guess, sooner or later testing/stable would be secured as well? > The packages on it are