On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:55:39PM +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> I'd say that those who can discern Debian non-free from Debian
> proper are at low risk of confusing, say, [1] with the "software
> [...] endorsed or even produced by Debian."
http://ftp.se.debian.org/ and http://ftp
> Lars Wirzenius writes:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:50:46AM +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>> Doesn’t the presence of the ‘non-free’ section in the official
>> Debian Release (InRelease) files /already/ mislead inexperienced
>> people into thinking that such software is either part of De
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:50:46AM +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> Doesn’t the presence of the ‘non-free’ section in the official
> Debian Release (InRelease) files /already/ mislead inexperienced
> people into thinking that such software is either part of Debian
> or endorsed
> Jakub Wilk writes:
[…]
> On a semi-unrelated note:
> Some of ftp*.*.d.o and cdimage.d.o mirrors serve random free (and
> sometimes non-free) software that is not Debian[*]. This may mislead
> inexperienced people into thinking that this software is endorsed or
> even produced by Deb
4 matches
Mail list logo