On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 04:31:45PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote:
> Isnt that effectively what debian has done by setting systemd-timesync
> to "standard" priority?
>
> if that's a bad decision, you should make the case to debian to change
> it i would think?
> (standard = installed by default, per
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:08:41AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2023-03-27 11:15:20, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > timesyncd needs to be configured with a reliable server to work well.
> > Canonical maintains their own NTP servers and uses them by default in
> > Ubun
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:12:04 + Richard Lewis
wrote:
> Presumably the release notes should also say that most people should
> consider systemd-timesyncd as this is priority:standard (since at
> least buster, but i dont remember seeing this in release notes then)?
> - i assume the idea is that
3 matches
Mail list logo
