Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Even if there's only two things, the fact is that the package maintainer
wants not only to decide what is supported but he might also want to
enable some features...
Did you think about having two fields, one to specify the set of
Hi,
thanks for your answers.
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Even if there's only two things, the fact is that the package maintainer
wants not only to decide what is supported but he might also want to
enable some features...
Did you think about having two
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
This doesn't make sense to me. The maintainer writes debian/rules; why
would they need to change Build-Options in debian/control to enable
anything about the build?
Because they want that anyone can easily
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Further I think it would be good if one could say use bar if supported
in an environment variable or conffile. For example the user might want
to use parallel building with 2 cores if the package supports it. But if
the package does not then
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
This doesn't make sense to me. The maintainer writes debian/rules; why
would they need to change Build-Options in debian/control to enable
anything about the build?
Because they want that anyone can easily
5 matches
Mail list logo
