Re: Bug#489771: New Build-Options field and build-arch option, please review

2008-09-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote: People have noticed that and already requested that we can call arbitrary targets of debian/rules with all the proper initialization done precisely for test purpose during packaging work (see #477916). I must say, I really do not like this

Re: Bug#489771: New Build-Options field and build-arch option, please review

2008-09-11 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:46 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote: People have noticed that and already requested that we can call arbitrary targets of debian/rules with all the proper initialization done precisely for test purpose during

Re: Bug#489771: New Build-Options field and build-arch option, please review

2008-09-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote: I like to say I concurr with Russ. There are some much difference between packages that distributions wide default does not make sense. Such change would rather lead me to hardcode values of

Re: Bug#489771: New Build-Options field and build-arch option, please review

2008-09-11 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 10:53 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote: I like to say I concurr with Russ. There are some much difference between packages that distributions wide default does not make sense. Such change

Bug#489771: New Build-Options field and build-arch option, please review

2008-09-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote: People have noticed that and already requested that we can call arbitrary targets of debian/rules with all the proper initialization done precisely for test purpose during packaging work (see #477916). I must say, I really do not like this

Bug#229357: Bug#489771: New Build-Options field and build-arch option, please review

2008-09-11 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:46 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote: People have noticed that and already requested that we can call arbitrary targets of debian/rules with all the proper initialization done precisely for test purpose during

Bug#489771: New Build-Options field and build-arch option, please review

2008-09-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote: I like to say I concurr with Russ. There are some much difference between packages that distributions wide default does not make sense. Such change would rather lead me to hardcode values of

Bug#229357: Bug#489771: New Build-Options field and build-arch option, please review

2008-09-11 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 10:53 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote: I like to say I concurr with Russ. There are some much difference between packages that distributions wide default does not make sense. Such change