Hi,
the latest version of my branch is online:
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/hertzog/dpkg.git;a=shortlog;h=deps-rewrite
git://git.debian.org/~hertzog/dpkg.git
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Guillem Jover wrote:
No need to call textdomain inside the modules (those can only be used
in dpkg-dev programs)
Quoting Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
(I have the feeling we already require translation of too many strings
that users won't never see)
Shared.
The dpkg POT file is, ahem, scary.
Frank objects that translators may choose what they translate and what
they don't. However, most of us
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:55:13PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I'm running this code and up to now it seems to work fine. During the
development, I also discovered a number of little bugs and oddities that I
took the liberty to commit directly on the master branch.
Please review and run
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Lack of attribution: I know the lintian code contains no
attributions, which doesn't neccessarily mean that this is a good
idea. You probably should add at least your name and the complete
attribution from lintian's debian/copyright
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
A short review turned up no obious flaws. I have no objections against
merging it into master for inclusion in the next release.
Cool!
Some notes:
- Should the parsing algorithm enforce the negated arch syntax, i.e.
that either none or all
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:01:04PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Some notes:
- Should the parsing algorithm enforce the negated arch syntax, i.e.
that either none or all architectures need to be negated?
I have no opinion here. There are
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 15:55:13 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Please review and run it. I think it can be merged soon, just tell me to
go ahead when you're confident. It would be nice to include it in the
upcoming release as it automatically removes duplicate dependencies
potentially
7 matches
Mail list logo
