On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Michael Guntsche wrote:
> I am not sure that this is really a bug, but I think because of ths right
> now the repository on emdebian is not usable for powerpc development.
Take libgcc from native powerpc repository and dpkg-cross it yourself.
--
Regards, Wartan.
Generic powerpc target should work fine for 4xx.
On 9/30/08, xavier grave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to have a cross tool system for powerpc 405 based on .deb packages.
>
> I have found a way to produce binutils for the powerp
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 01:27:14AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> For gcc-4.1 I did start tagging all cross build related bug reports;
> please find them at
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=cross-gcc;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I'd appreciate if somebody could do the same for the
On Nov 26, 2007 8:18 AM, Brendan Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any uclibc emdebian packages ???
We've got uclibc support in Slind.
--
Regards, Wartan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/25/07, Jim Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
compile many packages, but has problems with packages that try to invoke
a test program as part of the configure script to test the output of the
compiler.
dpkg-cross exports the variables listed in /etc/dpkg-cross/cross-config..
configure script
On 1/15/07, Alexander Shishkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps, thus blames about general ugliness may be
> directed right to Joey ;P
I was asking about a reason, not an excuse. :)
Joey is at [EMAIL PROTECTED], for any questions regarding reasons, the
meaning of life, Universe
On 1/15/07, Alexander Shishkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any particular reasons for having two different indentation styles in
one file (four spaces and one tab), having spaces around some random
braces and general ugliness in the coding style?
Here's the one perltidied.
Also take particular n
Hello.
Attached is a "new" version.
Major changes:
Fields are now checked in debian/control.
Field names are:
XCS-Cross-Build-[Depends, Conflicts] for packages installed with regular dpkg,
XCS-Cross-Host-Build-[Depends, Conflicts] for packages installed with
dpkg-cross.
--
Regards, Wartan.
dp
On 12/3/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's the equivalent to -a$arch for the quick rebuild instruction?
There ain't no such equivalent.
dpkg-cross can't step in your way if you execute make directly :)
--
Regards, Wartan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On 12/3/06, Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howabout having this information in the build-depending package itself?
ie. in the bison control file there would by:
> XBS-Host-Build-Dependable: yes
That would complicate the logic a bit. You would then have to parse
apt databases or whateve
On 12/3/06, Alexander Shishkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you want to be nice to the project you're trying to butt in, you
have to maintain your stuff on your own.
True, but you have to plan the effort. And take into account that
resources aren't infinite.
> The problem is that we do alre
On 12/3/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does it have to be a separate file? The installer team have a custom
line in debian/control, maybe we can ask for the same? Or just patch
the existing line?
I seriously doubt we can. We're not installer team, and our needs are
not nearly as
Hello.
As I haven't really seen that much of a reaction last time I've sent
the script, a repost.
Could anyone of dpkg-cross people comment (on the idea itself ;)?
(We even have a bug on that, #384694)
(For those living in the Brave GNU World: "Host" here means "build",
"Target" means "host")
On 12/1/06, Martin Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
crufty existing effort in the minimalisation department, the most
profitable efforts would be to modify Debian itself, rather than
propose yet another cut-down Debian-alike in the following directions:
Yet another? Point me at least two working,
On 11/27/06, Manuel Villar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
root::10933:0:9:7:::
AFAIK, this means that root user has no password as it should be.
Exactly, and that is the behaviour I've always experienced.
How do you try to log on? Via serial?
Are you sure you did not modify nfsroot at all?
--
On 11/27/06, Manuel Villar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've a built a kernel for an i.MX21 (csb535 board) using slind toolchain and
mounted the root filesystem via NSF. Everything goes OK and I see the welcome
message:
Which root filesystem? The one pre-packaged with suffolk ISO, for
slind-i
On 10/15/06, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
999_lib64_for_cross.dpatch is still available in #231707 logs. I've not yet
tested if it applies to current binutils package, and if this will fix
#391445, but I'm almost sure the problem is here.
Yes, it helps, just tested with bin
On 10/5/06, Jim Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
checking for library containing gettext... configure: error: Link tests
are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
Yeah, I've also stumbled upon this. I'll have a look on a weekend.
--
Regards, Wartan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On 10/4/06, Jim Heck - Sun Microsystems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I get a failure because the script can't find debian/*FFI* files.
It is neither a failure nor a stuck -- if you check, right debian/control
with right cross packages has already been created, and it just happens
so that the che
On 9/5/06, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't yet know what do I think about this - bit I'd like to mention
inconsistency in usage oh 'host'/'target'/'build' words.
Right, right.
I always keep intermixing these (as their usage out of GNU world is a
bit different ;), and th
On 9/4/06, Wartan Hachaturow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have fun and let me know what you guys think.
Oops. If anybody tried to use that (I doubt, but still), please apply
attached patch, or your regular builds would cease to stop on unmet
build-depends.
Anybody knows a way to make
Hello.
Recently, while thinking about build-depends problems we are all familar with, I
came up with the following idea: what if all of the packages we intend
to cross-compile
would have a special control-like file in debian/, which would have
build-depends
in a way we need them, that is, Host-Bu
On 6/21/06, l l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/MainPage
No, thanks.
That's all.
--
Regards, Wartan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will have either to rebuild whole native gcc to get this package,
or install our supplied pre-built one. Unfortunately, for gcc included
in the release, there's no other way.
On 6/19/06, Julien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
My system finished to build gcc, but when I tried to install
it, i
On 6/16/06, Julien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
e-mail was already posted on the ml. Where can I found the
md5sum of slind.iso ? If this isn't already online can someone
The one I had while I was preparing the CD:
5adf6d2be2b4e3c2d6c0e33e7e8d36b5 ./suffolk-0.1.iso
--
Regards, Wartan.
--
To UN
I do not see the single reason to do it like this -- and touching hurd,
doing a special kludge in dpkg-architecture, just because it does not fit
into uclibc naming convention you like.
Which is not true. This
http://www.xs4all.nl/~kurzanov/debian/patches/dpkg-1.13.16-uclibc.patch
is there sin
On 6/7/06, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the only distributions which are officially supporting the mpc5200 are
> commercial and i would love to use debian.
I wouldn't call our ELDK a "commercial distribution" - it's all free
software. See http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/ELDK
On 5/30/06, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I do think it would be really nice is to have a "contrib-builds"
SLIND repository (like backports do). This would make things easier for
sharing this effort.
Will be there Real Soon Now (tm). Hardware is already at the desk, I
just need t
On 5/29/06, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe better to set up BTS pseudo-package for cross-toolchain related
problems, with all mail forwarded to debian-embedded@, and reassign all
related bugs there?
I second this -- it would be much easier for us to manage then.
Regardi
On 5/16/06, Raphael Bossek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, who wishes to be listed in Uploaders?
put [EMAIL PROTECTED] in.
I would suggest those who initially were in my "announcement" -- that is,
Nikita, Raphael, [EMAIL PROTECTED], and me.
--
Regards, Wartan.
documentation
bits (plus, of course, particular members in Uploaders, where relevant).
Who's involved?
Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alexander Shishckin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Raphael Bossek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wartan Hachaturow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 3/21/06, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So somebody else should take over that thing.
> I will still be available for questions/discussions/etc if needed.
I think we (the slind team, that is) may take it over, since we use both
very actively and rely on both.
However, if an
On 3/13/06, Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even then, modifying each and every debian package is a daunting
> process. It's easier to provide a crosscompiling solution that makes
> the applications not notice that they have been crosscompiled. This i
> what Nokia is using too ;)
.. on t
On 3/12/06, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On embedded systems, bootloader usually lives outside of target filesystem.
> So where are you going to install these debs? :)
Once I had an idea to package pre-compiled u-boot images for different
boards, where the package would just
On 3/12/06, Eric Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've used toolchain-source to build a glibc-based cross-gcc, but I'm
> stuck trying to get it integrated with a cross-version of uclibc.
> If anyone has any pointers or HOWTO'S, I'd appreciate it.
http://www.emdebian.org/slind.html has uclibc
On 3/9/06, MuTuExpress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a freshman in learning linux,and I have some problems of cross compiling
> GTK,
You either have to have emulating environment like scratchbox, or have to supply
pre-set ac_cv_* variables for tests in the environment to configure script.
co
On 2/12/06, Falls Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
> I suggest that you use scratchbox(www.scratchbox.org) to cross compile
> your applications.
Sorry, but scratchbox is outside the scope of Debian toolchains so
far, so scratchbox-compiled applications are not guaranteed to work i
On 2/11/06, Dmitry Nezhevenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But i got binutils-arm-linux package. If i call dpkg-buildpackage with -d,
> i got error about non-existing arm-linux-gnu-ar. But my binutils have
> arm-linux-ar. I think, that symlink can solve this problem, but i think,
> that there is b
On 10/28/05, Peter Chubb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rosetta> Hi all I have make a jffs2 image by mkfs.jffs2. I want to
> rosetta> mount this image file, but the mount command does not support
> rosetta> the jffs2 file system.
>
> Actually, I think you'll find that the mount command *does* suppo
On 10/26/05, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Making support for such additional 'archs', targeting mainly uclibc archs,
> is *the* direction where I was going to move with dpkg-cross and debian
> cross-toolchain (I'm the current maintainer of those).
This is also a way we're cu
On 7/21/05, Max Hofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * how do we create a simple, minimalistic FS (in a Debian way)?
What I like best is the Stag-like approach, which I also implemented for our
internal embedded distribution. You have a couple of packages that constitute
a base system, and you inst
On 7/21/05, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm afraid that project is almost dead - at least there is very little
> mailing list activity over past months.
This isn't true. People just develop things privately, and it is really hard to
get opensource approval in, for example,
On 7/10/05, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - dpkg-cross will put libs and headers under /usr/arm-linux-gnu/ instead
> of /usr/arm-linux/
> - probably some other things I've not noticed yet.
>
> Should I proceed this way?
By all means yes, if that's the way dpkg-architecture b
On 4/17/05, Erich Waelde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the .deb package yourself. dpkg-cross does NOT cross-compile your application,
> as far as I understand it.
That's true, but only part of the truth. dpkg-cross package contains
not only dpkg-cross script itself,
which converts native binary pa
On 4/15/05, Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you can use the package toolchain-source, this will build the toolchain
> as debian packages for the architecture you want. You will also need
> binutils-multiarch.
This was also discussed in the past.
toolchain-source is not actively maintain
45 matches
Mail list logo
