Matthias,
I first wanted to get back to something working for me, i.e. 4.6.3-8.
I will upload later today (more probably provide some link to) some
failing preprocessed files.
Best regards
C.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> you didn't provide the preprocessed source.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 688587 important
Bug #688587 [gcc-4.6] gcc-4.6: g++-4.6-10 ice on valid code
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
688587: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
On 24.09.2012 00:07, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> Dear Debian GCC maintainers,
>
> with 4.6.3-10 I get massive ice (on almost all C++ object files I compile).
> To fix that I reverted to -8.
> I reported this but didn't get the email from the BTS nor does it show
> in the bugs database yet.
>
>
Dear Debian GCC maintainers,
with 4.6.3-10 I get massive ice (on almost all C++ object files I compile).
To fix that I reverted to -8.
I reported this but didn't get the email from the BTS nor does it show
in the bugs database yet.
4.7-x is in a similar state for me since it generates also faulty
tags 688587 + moreinfo
thanks
On 23.09.2012 23:44, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> Package: gcc-4.6
> Version: 4.6.3-10
> Severity: serious
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: g++-4.6 ice on valid c++ code since -10 (possibly -9)
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>* What led up to the situation?
>
> upgr
Package: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6.3-10
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: g++-4.6 ice on valid c++ code since -10 (possibly -9)
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
upgrading gcc-4.6 from -8 to -10
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
inef
On 2012-09-23 14:32, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 22.09.2012 15:04, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On 2012-09-22 12:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> I don't want this in gcc-4.7. Please provide a patch for gcc-defaults. This
>>> should work as well.
>>
>> That won't work, just tried it. The only package fro
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_7_2_release revision 191558
Target: mips-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-2)
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
UNRESOLVED: attribute_plugin.c compilation, -I.
-I/build/build
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_7_2_release revision 191558
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
=== boehm-gc tests ===
Running target unix
=== boehm-gc Summary ===
# of expected passes12
# of unsupported tests 1
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_7_2_release revision 191558
Target: mipsel-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-1)
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
UNRESOLVED: attribute_plugin.c compilation, -I.
-I/build/b
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_7_2_release revision 191558
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
=== boehm-gc tests ===
Running target unix
=== boehm-gc Summary ===
# of expected passes12
# of unsupported tests 1
On 22.09.2012 15:04, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-09-22 12:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I don't want this in gcc-4.7. Please provide a patch for gcc-defaults. This
>> should work as well.
>
> That won't work, just tried it. The only package from gcc-defaults that
> could be involved in the pr
12 matches
Mail list logo
