Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2001 21:01:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 10 16:01:19 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta05-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14xxYl-0006QV-00; Thu, 10 May 2001 16:01:19 -0500
Received: from dueto.rano1.org ([62.253.149.167]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 May 2001 22:01:03 +0100
Received: from ege by dueto.rano1.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14xxIe-0001WZ-00; Thu, 10 May 2001 21:44:40 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 21:44:40 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc
Version: 1:2.95.3-7
Severity: important
Maybe I've been working too hard, but this gcc seems to get this wrong
with -O2:
void gunc(unsigned a, unsigned b)
{
}
unsigned func(unsigned a, unsigned b)
{
long long x = 0;
gunc(a, b);
return (x + 1) * a * b;
}
int main()
{
unsigned a, b;
a = 1;
b = 1;
return func(a, b);
}
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux dueto.rano1.org 2.2.19 #4 SMP Mon Apr 16 12:55:15 BST
2001 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages gcc depends on:
ii cpp 2.95.3-7 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii cpp-2.95 2.95.4-0.01042 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii gcc-2.95 2.95.4-0.01042 The GNU C compiler.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 97030-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 22:10:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 27 17:10:18 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1548jm-0005Ir-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:10:14 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03363;
Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id AAA01795;
Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) unstable; urgency=high
* Urgency "high" for replacing the gcc-3.0 snapshots in testing, which
now are incompatile due to the changed ABIs.
* Upstream begins tagging with "gcc-3_0_pre_2001mmdd".
* Tighten dependencies to install only binary packages derived from
one source (#98851). Tighten libc6-dev dependency to match libc6.
gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010525) unstable; urgency=low
* ATTENTION: The ABI (exception handling) changed. No upgrade path from
earlier snapshots (you had been warned in the postinst ...)
Closing #93597, #94576, #96448, #96461.
You have to rebuild
* HELP is appreciated for scanning the Debian BTS and sending followups
to bug reports!!!
* Should we name debian gcc uploads? What about a "still seeking
g++ maintainer" upload?
* Fixed in gcc-3.0: #97030
* Update patches for recent (010525) CVS sources.
* Make check depend on build target (fakeroot problmes).
* debian/rules.d/binary-libgcc.mk: new file, build first.
* Free memory detection on the hurd for running the testsuite.
* Update debhelper build dependency.
* libstdc++-doc: Include doxygen generated docs.
* Fix boring packaging bugs, too tired for appropriate changelogs ...
#93343, #96348, #96262, #97134, #97905, #96451, #95812, #93157
* Fixed bugs: #87000.
