Package: libc6
Version: 2.38-11
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
$ adequate --all --tags -py-file-not-bytecompiled
libc6:i386: undefined-symbol /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1 => ps_pdwrite
libc6:i386: undefined-symbol
pe 29. maalisk. 2024 klo 1.01 Aurelien Jarno (aure...@debian.org) kirjoitti:
>
> On 2024-03-28 20:35, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > Package: libc-devtools
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > libgd3 pulls an excessive amount of dependencies, including fonts. It would
>
Package: libc-devtools
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
libgd3 pulls an excessive amount of dependencies, including fonts. It would
thus be desirable to downgrade it to a mere Recommends.
Martin-Éric
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT
Package: libc6
Version: 2.31-17
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Since 2.31-17 trickled into Bookworm, a number of executables (including APT
and GDB) die with sig ILL. An example:
$ sudo coredumpctl debug 1011
confirmed that this is not caused by w3m code
itself, so it's pointless to reassing back to w3m.
--
Martin-Éric Racine
http://q-funk.iki.fi
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:26:35 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Ãric Racine wrote:
That said, I believe I upgraded it to something
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:26:35 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Ãric Racine wrote:
That said, I believe I upgraded it to something
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1 series at
one point while still running 2.4 without obvious problems.
IIRC 2.3.2 up to ds1-8 worked well
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1 series at
one point while still running 2.4 without obvious problems.
IIRC 2.3.2 up to ds1-8 worked well
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: important
Several applications which depend either upon /etc/hosts or upon proper
resolving of filesystem paths accross a
connection have started failing, since a few days:
1) The stanza 'scp /path/to/file remote:/path/to/' no longer works.
2) NFS
, at least on i386 but, right now, ds1-10 is
causing chaos on both hppa, i386 and powerpc.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: important
Several applications which depend either upon /etc/hosts or upon proper resolving of
filesystem paths accross a
connection have started failing, since a few days:
1) The stanza 'scp /path/to/file remote:/path/to/' no longer works.
2) NFS
, at least on i386 but, right now, ds1-10 is
causing chaos on both hppa, i386 and powerpc.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:05:26AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Given how libc6-dev has now become dependant upon
linux-kernel-headers (why the hell wasn't libc6-dev designed to
accomodate an existing and reliable kernel-headers-2.4.xx
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:05:26AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Given how libc6-dev has now become dependant upon
linux-kernel-headers (why the hell wasn't libc6-dev designed to
accomodate an existing and reliable kernel-headers-2.4.xx
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
For example:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../gfxdrivers/matrox -I../.. -I../../../include
-I../../../src -D_REENTRANT -Wall -O3 -ffast-math -pipe -DFUSION_FAKE
-Werror-implicit-function-declaration -c
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
For example:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../gfxdrivers/matrox -I../.. -I../../../include
-I../../../src -D_REENTRANT -Wall -O3 -ffast-math -pipe -DFUSION_FAKE
-Werror-implicit-function-declaration -c
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:06:24AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 02:05:11AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-16
Followup-For: Bug
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-16
Followup-For: Bug #205691
Actually, locales cannot be installed AT ALL in testing or unstable, for HPPA.
Kudos to whoever allowed the package
to slide from unstable to testing, without first ensuring that ALL
architectures were in sync. Hello, McFly!!! DOH!
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 02:05:11AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-16
Followup-For: Bug #205691
Actually, locales cannot be installed AT ALL in testing or unstable,
for HPPA. Kudos to whoever allowed
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-16
Followup-For: Bug #205691
Actually, locales cannot be installed AT ALL in testing or unstable, for HPPA. Kudos
to whoever allowed the package
to slide from unstable to testing, without first ensuring that ALL architectures were
in sync. Hello, McFly!!! DOH!
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 02:05:11AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-16
Followup-For: Bug #205691
Actually, locales cannot be installed AT ALL in testing or unstable,
for HPPA. Kudos to whoever allowed
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
While investigating possible causes for bug#173128 (libgtk1.2), I found out
that locales
directories are not generated as /usr/lib/locale/[EMAIL PROTECTED] in locales
2.3.1. Instead,
a huge
23 matches
Mail list logo
