At Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:53:21 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:15:02 +0200 (EET),
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > > > > > That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1
> > > > > > > series at
> > > > > > > one point while still running 2.4 without obvious pr
At Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:53:21 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:15:02 +0200 (EET),
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > > > > > That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1 series
> > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > one point while still running 2.4 without obvious pr
At Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:15:02 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > > > > That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1 series at
> > > > > > one point while still running 2.4 without obvious problems.
> > > > >
> > > > > IIRC 2.3.2 up to ds1-8 worked well, at least on i38
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:26:35 +0200 (EET),
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> >
> > > At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
> > > Martin-Ãric Racine wrote:
> > > > > That said, I believe I upgraded it to some
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:26:35 +0200 (EET),
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> >
> > > At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
> > > Martin-Ãric Racine wrote:
> > > > > That said, I believe I upgraded it to some
At Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:26:35 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
>
> > At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
> > Martin-Ãric Racine wrote:
> > > > That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1 series
> > > > at
> > > > one poin
At Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:26:35 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
>
> > At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
> > Martin-Ãric Racine wrote:
> > > > That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1 series at
> > > > one point while s
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1 series at
> > > one point while still running 2.4 without obvious problems.
> >
> > IIRC 2.3.2 up to ds1-8 worke
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1 series at
> > > one point while still running 2.4 without obvious problems.
> >
> > IIRC 2.3.2 up to ds1-8 worke
At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1 series at
> > one point while still running 2.4 without obvious problems.
>
> IIRC 2.3.2 up to ds1-8 worked well, at least on i386 but, right now, ds1-10 is
> ca
At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1 series at
> > one point while still running 2.4 without obvious problems.
>
> IIRC 2.3.2 up to ds1-8 worked well, at least on i386 but, right now, ds1-10 is
> ca
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:27:32PM +0200, Martin-�ric Racine wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
> > Severity: important
> > -- System Information:
> > Debian Release: testing/unstable
> > Architecture: powerpc
> > Kernel: Linux omena 2
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:27:32PM +0200, Martin-�ric Racine wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
> > Severity: important
> > -- System Information:
> > Debian Release: testing/unstable
> > Architecture: powerpc
> > Kernel: Linux omena 2
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:27:32PM +0200, Martin-ïric Racine wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
> Severity: important
>
> Several applications which depend either upon /etc/hosts or upon
> proper resolving of filesystem paths accross a connection have started
> failing, since a few da
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:27:32PM +0200, Martin-ïric Racine wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
> Severity: important
>
> Several applications which depend either upon /etc/hosts or upon
> proper resolving of filesystem paths accross a connection have started
> failing, since a few da
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: important
Several applications which depend either upon /etc/hosts or upon proper
resolving of filesystem paths accross a
connection have started failing, since a few days:
1) The stanza 'scp /path/to/file remote:/path/to/' no longer works.
2) NFS m
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: important
Several applications which depend either upon /etc/hosts or upon proper resolving of
filesystem paths accross a
connection have started failing, since a few days:
1) The stanza 'scp /path/to/file remote:/path/to/' no longer works.
2) NFS m
17 matches
Mail list logo
