On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Preparing to replace libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using
> > .../libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-19_amd64.deb) ...
> > Unpacking replacement libc6-dev ...
> > Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using
> > ..././libc
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:14:24PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Could you please provide details about the problem of having the
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:14:24PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > >
> > > Could you please provide details about the problem of having the
> > > symlinks in glibc?
> > >
> > > Is it that
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The problem is we already have it in base-files on every installed
> amd64 system.
Yes, I'm fully aware of that. See the message I wrote after that.
> > In such case I think it would be completely acceptable that the preinst
> > simply manipulate
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Andreas Jochens wrote:
>
>> However, I had severe problems with 'glibc' upgrades when the '/lib64'
>> symlink was created by 'glibc' instead of 'base-files'.
>> Basically, everything stopped working during the upgrade because
>> th
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >
> > Could you please provide details about the problem of having the
> > symlinks in glibc?
> >
> > Is it that glibc has a versioned Replaces: base-files and dpkg removes
> > the symlink in
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> Could you please provide details about the problem of having the
> symlinks in glibc?
>
> Is it that glibc has a versioned Replaces: base-files and dpkg removes
> the symlink in base-files before installing the one from glibc,
> c
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> However, I had severe problems with 'glibc' upgrades when the '/lib64'
> symlink was created by 'glibc' instead of 'base-files'.
> Basically, everything stopped working during the upgrade because
> the '/lib64' temporarily disappeared and the binarie
Maybe I should be somewhat more specific than I was in my mail from
a few minutes ago.
The only patch for the '/lib64' directory symlink which is currently
known to work for amd64 is the patch to 'base-files' that is
used by the amd64 port now. Until someone comes up with a better patch
and this
On 04-Dec-05 01:18, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sat, 04 Dec 2004 15:50:31 +0100,
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Andreas, is it nice to symlink from /lib to /lib64 ? I agree we have
> > > /lib64 on amd64.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > -- gotom
> >
> > Currently lib64 links to lib and reversing tha
At Sat, 04 Dec 2004 15:50:31 +0100,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >>
> >> > Conclusion:
> >> >
> >> > - I would like to see those links in sarge (for amd64 only, no change
> >> > for other archs) since they are currently essential for amd64 (
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:37:23 +0100 (CET),
> Santiago Vila wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>> > Conclusion:
>> >
>> > - I would like to see those links in sarge (for amd64 only, no change
>> > for other archs) since they ar
At Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:37:23 +0100 (CET),
Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Conclusion:
> >
> > - I would like to see those links in sarge (for amd64 only, no change
> > for other archs) since they are currently essential for amd64 (glibc
> > relies o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 259302 libc6
Bug#259302: base-files: Support for amd64.
Bug reassigned from package `base-files' to `libc6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
reassign 259302 libc6
thanks
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Conclusion:
>
> - I would like to see those links in sarge (for amd64 only, no change
> for other archs) since they are currently essential for amd64 (glibc
> relies on it). What package provides them is no that i
15 matches
Mail list logo
