Bug#245643: libc6: problem with $kernel_ver in preinst
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: important
Tags: sid
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3foulademer02032004
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
Hi
When I upgrade libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 to libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 I have a
problem:
D02: fork/exec /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst ( )
WARNING: Your kernel version indicates a revision number
of 255 or greater. Glibc has a number of built in
assumptions that this revision number is less than 255.
If you've built your own kernel, please make sure that any
custom version numbers are appended to the upstream
kernel number with a dash or some other delimiter.
dpkg : erreur de traitement de
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb (--install) :
le sous-processus pre-installation script a retourné une erreur de
sortie d'état 1
The script preinst contains:
# Test to make sure z 255, in x.y.z-n form of kernel version
kernel_rev=$(uname -r | awk -F '[.-]' '{print $3}')
if [ $kernel_rev -ge 255 ]
But if you compiled your kernel with --append-to-version=foo, uname -r
will be x.y.zfoo and kernel_rev will contain foo and installation will fail (exit 1)
Thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())
At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:58:58 -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: At Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:11:15 +0200, BUCHMULLER Norbert wrote: Isn't it CAN-2003-0689? (I have not seen that fixed in libc6's It _is_. I didn't know this bug before... Debian security team, could you look at it? Yes, this is not a new bug...however I do not consider it to have genuine security impact. In order to be triggered, a user must be a member of an unusually large number of groups (not under user's control), and in order to be exploited, the group names (not under user's control) would need to be manipulated. So the only attack vector I see is user can cause some programs to crash by asking the sysadmin to add him to a large number of groups. Thanks for your explanation. This bug has been seen to cause problems with, e.g., samba in real-world situations, though, so it might be worth fixing in an upload to proposed-updates. Unfortunatelly we have been missed proposed-updates for glibc in woody. It's fixed in coming release sarge... Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245643: libc6: problem with $kernel_ver in preinst
At Sat, 24 Apr 2004 13:34:53 +0200,
COLPART Gregory wrote:
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3foulademer02032004
When I upgrade libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 to libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 I have a
problem:
D02: fork/exec /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst ( )
WARNING: Your kernel version indicates a revision number
of 255 or greater. Glibc has a number of built in
assumptions that this revision number is less than 255.
If you've built your own kernel, please make sure that any
custom version numbers are appended to the upstream
kernel number with a dash or some other delimiter.
dpkg : erreur de traitement de
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb (--install) :
le sous-processus pre-installation script a retourn une erreur de
sortie d'tat 1
The script preinst contains:
# Test to make sure z 255, in x.y.z-n form of kernel version
kernel_rev=$(uname -r | awk -F '[.-]' '{print $3}')
if [ $kernel_rev -ge 255 ]
This preinst file is in -11, not in -12. Are your libc6 really -12?
But if you compiled your kernel with --append-to-version=foo, uname -r
will be x.y.zfoo and kernel_rev will contain foo and installation will fail (exit 1)
This problem should be fixed in -12. See #241395.
Regards,
-- gotom
Bug#204691: marked as done (libc6: stacksize is too small)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:25:41 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#204691: still not working in current libc6-i686 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2003 11:48:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 09 06:48:39 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h174n1fls303o885.telia.com (zstudios) [81.227.152.174] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19lSD9-00013n-00; Sat, 09 Aug 2003 06:48:39 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alexander Bussman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6: stacksize is too small X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20 Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 13:49:41 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: normal Some programs requires larger stacksize for example transgaming's WineX. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux zstudios 2.4.21 #6 SMP Mon Jul 21 12:48:50 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 204691-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 12:25:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 05:25:42 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHME1-0002oV-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 05:25:42 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30644DEB58; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:25:41 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:25:41 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#204691: still not working in current libc6-i686 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 At Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:30:57 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 12:58:16AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: I have installed libc6-i686, version 2.3.2.ds1-11, and I am still seeing this bug when trying to run winex. To use winex I have to tell it to disable usage of pthreads completly. Transgaming claims debian's libc responsible, since other distributions have bigger stacksize. Gotom spoke of a libc in experimental, but I suppose that it has been replaces already. Are there any other things I can try? Hmm. Your kernel is 2.6.3, so NPTL or i686-capable pthread should be used. Could you execute ldd with your binaries? If your binaries use newer pthread, ldd shows as follows: libpthread.so.0 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0x4017a000) ok, it was an environment issue here. Because of xmms crashing with this lib i set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to 2.4.25, which seems to cause trouble. Without this setting winex3 doesnt complaint anymore with libc-i686. Thanks for pointing out. OK, that's good. Perhaps this should be documented e.g. in debian-reference? This about where you know about LD_ASSUME_KERNEL. At least glibc ordinal documents do not mention about such environment variable. Regards, -- gotom -- To
Bug#238963: Bug#230857: libc6: remove /etc/default/{devpts,tmpfs} etc
At Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:21:35 +0200,
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Sure, I've made the nessecary changes, and -16 is ready for upload:
Cool. Thanks for your working.
sysvinit (2.85-16) unstable; urgency=high
* Remove /etc/init.d/{mountkernfs,devpts.sh) that glibc installed
since mountvirtfs now provides these. (closes: #230857)
* Remove -e from mountvirtfs (closes: #232122)
* Add some more comments/documentation to mountvirtfs
* Initscripts depends on libc6 anyway right now, so we let it
depend on libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-12) via shlibs.local
* Suggest sysv-rc-conf (closes: #244643)
* Updated french manpage for update-rc.d (closes: #245007)
* Use larger dmesg buffer (-s option) (closes: #242923)
-- Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:11:17 +0200
I'm just waiting for 2.3.2.ds1-12 to hit the archive before I upload
the new sysvinit, so I don't upload a package whose dependencies
cannot be satisfied.
OK, please dupload if -12 spreads out well.
Regards,
-- gotm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245337: marked as done (locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:35:49 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#245337: Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 16:24:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 09:24:33 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from jack.feedbackplusinc.com [64.25.11.70] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BGh05-0001Dg-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:24:33 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jack.feedbackplusinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316178FF78; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:24:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from jack.feedbackplusinc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jack [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20258-10; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:24:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from station-1.internal.feedbackplusinc.com (unknown [10.0.0.16]) by jack.feedbackplusinc.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9729D8FE0B; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: by station-1.internal.feedbackplusinc.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0500 From: Jerry Haltom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56 Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: locales Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11 Severity: normal We are trying to set our office's locale settings by changing the debconf setting locales/locales_to_be_generated to be a properly formed list of locales that should be generated. However, the locales package ignores our settings, and overrides the selections in the actual multiselect combo box with the actual contents of /etc/locale.gen. This prevents usage of Debconf to properly configure these questions non-interactively. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.4 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 Versions of packages locales depends on: ii debconf 1.4.22 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-11] 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- debconf information: * locales/default_environment_locale: en_US.UTF-8 * locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_US ISO-8859-1, en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8 --- Received: (at 245337-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 12:35:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 05:35:50 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHMNq-00049U-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 05:35:50 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8495DEB58; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:35:49 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:35:49 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jerry Haltom [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier), [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#245337: Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration) In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version:
Bug#245568: marked as done (libc6: causes errors on linux-2.6.5 with PaX and CONFIG_PAX_NOVSYSCALL)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:37:45 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#245568: duplicate has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2004 20:44:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 23 13:44:58 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ares.penguinhosting.net [205.231.149.48] (qmailr) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BH7Xe-0001GI-00; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:44:58 -0700 Received: (qmail 7189 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Apr 2004 20:44:57 - Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 20:37:44 + From: Ian Gulliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6: causes errors on linux-2.6.5 with PaX and CONFIG_PAX_NOVSYSCALL Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Linux ares.penguinhosting.net 2.4.26-grsec User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Content-Type: multipart/postage; boundary=d15dce57a1de9d0b9c64e119509a8246 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 --d15dce57a1de9d0b9c64e119509a8246 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12 Severity: important Tags: sid On Linux 2.6.5 with the PaX patch applied: http://pax.grsecurity.net/pax-linux-2.6.5-200404181525.patch and the CONFIG_PAX_NOVSYSCALL flag enabled, the system dies during startup with a series of PaX errors: PAX: execution attempt in: anonymous mapping, 5a9b9000-5a9bc000 e000 PAX: terminating task: /sbin/init(init):1, uid/euid: 0/0, PC: 5a9bb6d4, SP: 5a9bb404 PAX: bytes at PC: 58 b8 77 00 00 00 cd 80 00 00 00 00 20 b7 9b 5a 05 00 00 00 PAX: bytes at SP: 0011 0033 007b 007b 5a9bb718 5a9bb718 5a9bb6e0 000b 5a9bb720 fffc 24a99398 0073 0246 5a9bb6e0 007b Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init! The PaX maintainer diagnoses this as a glibc problem, saying: [20:19:32] pipacs flamingcow,that's the sigreturn trampoline [20:19:56] pipacs wihch glibc should provide and use itself but instead it entirely relies on the kernel's vsyscall page [20:20:16] flamingcow can i quote you on that? [20:20:18] pipacs or when that's not available, it falls back on whatever the kernel used to provide [20:20:28] pipacs which happens to be on the (non-exec) stack [20:20:33] pipacs the rest you can see yourself ;P [20:20:43] pipacs sure, just quote it entirely [20:20:48] pipacs so that they know what to fix [20:21:10] pipacs basically, they should fall back onto glibc's own sigreturn code and not that of the kernel's when vsyscall is not enabled On the same kernel, simply disabling NOVSYSCALL causes the system to work properly. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAiX6XefI+qeoOjxURAuIYAKCDec05HZRi+1TfFHMV+brIgk6u4QCfff4i UcnsdrFtRm1Sfl9SD88zsVY= =akUV -END PGP SIGNATURE- --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN-- --d15dce57a1de9d0b9c64e119509a8246 Content-Type: application/postage-hashcash Version: 1.1 Mint-Hash: FH0Kk4Le83HbYvehOFk92huwpeQ= To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 20040423T20:37:44 Amount: 24 14b7565 --d15dce57a1de9d0b9c64e119509a8246-- --- Received: (at 245568-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 12:37:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 05:37:46 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHMPi-0004FP-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 05:37:46 -0700 Received: from
Bug#245657: ro_RO ISO-8859-2 generation broken
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12 Severity: important The generation of ro_RO ISO-8859-2 is broken due to the following message: snip pt_PT.ISO-8859-1... done ro_RO.ISO-8859-2...LC_ADDRESS: `country_ab3' value does not match `country_num' value dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: locales E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) /snip I quickly did a dpkg-reconfigure --force locales to remove the ro_RO local, which helped, but ro_RO users won't like this, so marked this important. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages locales depends on: ii debconf 1.4.22 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-12] 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- debconf information: * locales/default_environment_locale: None * locales/locales_to_be_generated: af_ZA ISO-8859-1, ar_IN UTF-8, be_BY CP1251, bg_BG CP1251, br_FR ISO-8859-1, bs_BA ISO-8859-2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, ca_ES ISO-8859-1, cs_CZ ISO-8859-2, cy_GB ISO-8859-14, da_DK ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, de_AT ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, de_BE ISO-8859-1, de_CH ISO-8859-1, de_CH.UTF-8 UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, de_DE ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] UTF-8, de_DE.UTF-8 UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, de_LU ISO-8859-1, el_GR ISO-8859-7, el_GR.UTF-8 UTF-8, en_AU ISO-8859-1, en_BW ISO-8859-1, en_CA ISO-8859-1, en_DK ISO-8859-1, en_GB ISO-8859-1, en_GB.UTF-8 UTF-8, en_HK ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, en_IE ISO-8859-1, en_IN UTF-8, en_NZ ISO-8859-1, en_PH ISO-8859-1, en_SG ISO-8859-1, en_US ISO-8859-1, en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8, en_ZA ISO-8859-1, en_ZW ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, es_ES ISO-8859-1, es_US ISO-8859-1, et_EE ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, eu_ES ISO-8859-1, fa_IR.UTF-8 UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, fi_FI ISO-8859-1, fo_FO ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, fr_BE ISO-8859-1, fr_CA ISO-8859-1, fr_CH ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, fr_FR ISO-8859-1, fr_FR.UTF-8 UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, fr_LU ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, ga_IE ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, gl_ES ISO-8859-1, gv_GB ISO-8859-1, he_IL ISO-8859-8, hi_IN.UTF-8 UTF-8, hr_HR ISO-8859-2, hu_HU ISO-8859-2, id_ID ISO-8859-1, is_IS ISO-8859-1, it_CH ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, it_IT ISO-8859-1, iw_IL ISO-8859-8, ja_JP.EUC-JP EUC-JP, ja_JP.UTF-8 UTF-8, ka_GE GEORGIAN-PS, kl_GL ISO-8859-1, ko_KR.EUC-KR EUC-KR, ko_KR.UTF-8 UTF-8, kw_GB ISO-8859-1, lt_LT ISO-8859-13, lv_LV ISO-8859-13, mi_NZ ISO-8859-13, mk_MK ISO-8859-5, mr_IN.UTF-8 UTF-8, ms_MY ISO-8859-1, mt_MT ISO-8859-3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, nl_BE ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, nl_NL ISO-8859-1, nn_NO ISO-8859-1, no_NO ISO-8859-1, oc_FR ISO-8859-1, pl_PL ISO-8859-2, pt_BR ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, pt_PT ISO-8859-1, ro_RO ISO-8859-2, ru_RU ISO-8859-5, ru_RU.KOI8-R KOI8-R, ru_RU.UTF-8 UTF-8, ru_UA KOI8-U, sk_SK ISO-8859-2, sl_SI ISO-8859-2, sq_AL ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, sv_FI ISO-8859-1, sv_SE ISO-8859-1, ta_IN UTF-8, te_IN UTF-8, th_TH TIS-620, tr_TR ISO-8859-9, uk_UA KOI8-U, vi_VN.UTF-8 UTF-8, zh_CN.GB18030 GB18030, zh_CN GB2312, zh_CN.GBK GBK, zh_CN.UTF-8 UTF-8, zh_HK BIG5-HKSCS, zh_HK.UTF-8 UTF-8, zh_TW Big5 -- Bye, Pabs
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Sat Apr 24 07:28:34 MDT 2004 Log Message: debian/control.in/main: Change to new email address. Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245664: cy_GB.UTF-8, and probably other locales, should be supported
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11 /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED should include a line cy_GB UTF-8, and possibly similar lines for other locales. Such lines have already been added in upstream CVS. I have been using cy_GB.UTF-8 as my locale for almost a year with no problems. The absence of such lines impedes the use of UTF-8 for Debian users, i.e. you cannot use the debconf front-end for generating UTF-8 locales, but rather have to resort to adding lines to /etc/locale.gen and running locale-gen by hand. -- Dafydd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#184573: marked as done (missing res_search in -lresolv)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:42:29 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2003 09:51:56 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 13 03:51:54 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 80-24-13-86.uc.nombres.ttd.es (getyouriso.dyndns.org) [80.24.13.86]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18tPNP-0008Df-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 03:51:51 -0600
Received: from aragorn ([192.168.0.3])
by getyouriso.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18tQqB-0002cm-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:25:39 +0100
Received: from rmh by aragorn with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18tPMf-7d-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:51:05 +0100
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:51:05 +0100
From: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: missing res_search in -lresolv
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Organisation: free as in freedom
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc0.3
Severity: normal
res_search is not present in -lresolv for libc0.3. from an autoconf test:
$ cat test.c
/* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */
/* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */
char res_search();
int main()
{
res_search();
return 0;
}
$ gcc test.c -o /dev/null -lresolv
/tmp/cct24sIo.o(.text+0x11): In function `main':
: undefined reference to `res_search'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
--
Robert Millan
make: *** No rule to make target `war'. Stop.
Another world is possible - Just say no to genocide
---
Received: (at 184573-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 14:43:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 07:43:05 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.73]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BHOMz-6B-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 07:43:05 -0700
Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([65.49.88.87])
by fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with ESMTP
id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:42:21 -0400
Subject: Closing bug
From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature;
boundary==-5STp6o4UljdNpUrQIxFu
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:42:29 -0400
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at
fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [65.49.88.87] using ID [EMAIL
PROTECTED] at Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:42:21 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--=-5STp6o4UljdNpUrQIxFu
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Closing this bug per a conversation with Robert on IRC.
--=20
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
intended, you are merely a surprise :)
- Carlos O'Donnell
--=-5STp6o4UljdNpUrQIxFu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBAinzU5M5hmdCYCpkRAiSjAJ4+JVgmyWhZ3eQpw55N6yzlfM4O7gCgl3u5
nnYYYkIaWrsak/E7QDoVvVY=
=5ifH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--=-5STp6o4UljdNpUrQIxFu--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245657: ro_RO ISO-8859-2 generation broken
At Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:20:44 +0800, Pabs wrote: The generation of ro_RO ISO-8859-2 is broken due to the following message: snip pt_PT.ISO-8859-1... done ro_RO.ISO-8859-2...LC_ADDRESS: `country_ab3' value does not match `country_num' value dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: locales E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) /snip I quickly did a dpkg-reconfigure --force locales to remove the ro_RO local, which helped, but ro_RO users won't like this, so marked this important. This is because locale/iso-3166.def has wrong entry: cvs diff -r 1.3 -r 1.4 locale/iso-3166.def Index: locale/iso-3166.def === RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/locale/iso-3166.def,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- locale/iso-3166.def 7 Aug 2001 18:50:46 - 1.3 +++ locale/iso-3166.def 4 Dec 2003 04:33:59 - 1.4 @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (PUERTO RICO, PR, PRI, 630) DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (QATAR, QA, QAT, 634) DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (REUNION, RE, REU, 638) -DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (ROMANIA, RO, ROM, 642) +DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (ROMANIA, RO, ROU, 642) DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (RUSSIAN FEDERATION, RU, RUS, 643) DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (RWANDA, RW, RWA, 646) DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (SAINT HELENA, SH, SHN, 654) Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#245657: ro_RO ISO-8859-2 generation broken
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 12:45:43AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:20:44 +0800, Pabs wrote: The generation of ro_RO ISO-8859-2 is broken due to the following message: snip ro_RO.ISO-8859-2...LC_ADDRESS: `country_ab3' value does not match `country_num' value [...] This is because locale/iso-3166.def has wrong entry: byn_ER.UTF-8 fails for a similar reason. A fix is in http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/locale/iso-639.def.diff?r1=1.12r2=1.13cvsroot=glibc All other locales build without trouble. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245736: locale: Romanian locale broken
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12 Severity: important Tags: l10n sid Hello, The ro_RO locale seems to be currently broken, and can't compile with localedef. This prevents locales package configuration if one romanian locale is used. Here's dpkg output : Setting up locales (2.3.2.ds1-12) ... Generating locales... el_GR.ISO-8859-7... done el_GR.UTF-8... done en_US.ISO-8859-1... done en_US.UTF-8... done [EMAIL PROTECTED] done fr_FR.ISO-8859-1... done fr_FR.UTF-8... done ro_RO.ISO-8859-2...LC_ADDRESS: `country_ab3' value does not match `country_num' value dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245736: locale: Romanian locale broken
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12 Severity: important Tags: l10n sid Hello, The ro_RO locale seems to be currently broken, and can't compile with localedef. This prevents locales package configuration if one romanian locale is used. Here's dpkg output : Setting up locales (2.3.2.ds1-12) ... Generating locales... el_GR.ISO-8859-7... done el_GR.UTF-8... done en_US.ISO-8859-1... done en_US.UTF-8... done [EMAIL PROTECTED] done fr_FR.ISO-8859-1... done fr_FR.UTF-8... done ro_RO.ISO-8859-2...LC_ADDRESS: `country_ab3' value does not match `country_num' value dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245736: oops wrong package
Sorry, I don't know why I searched for this bug in libc6... It was for the locale package and is already reported. Please close that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245736: oops wrong package
Sorry, I don't know why I searched for this bug in libc6... It was for the locale package and is already reported. Please close that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#202197: libc6-dev: _POSIX_MESSAGE_PASSING should be defined to -1
At Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:09:05 +, Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In /usr/include/bits/posix_opt.h, _POSIX_MESSAGE_PASSING is explicitly undefined. It has the following comment: /* POSIX message queues are not yet supported. */ #undef _POSIX_MESSAGE_PASSING This will be fixed in kernel 2.6.6 and cvs glibc 2.3.3. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245736: marked as done (locale: Romanian locale broken)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:25:54 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#245736: oops wrong package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 00:31:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 17:31:33 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailfe07.swip.net [212.247.154.193] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHXYS-VP-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:31:33 -0700 Received: from [213.103.198.106] (HELO blobby.home) by mailfe07.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with ESMTP id 18511966; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 02:31:30 +0200 Received: from gael by blobby.home with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BHXYP-II-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 02:31:29 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Gael Queri [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: locale: Romanian locale broken X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 02:31:28 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Gael Queri [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12 Severity: important Tags: l10n sid Hello, The ro_RO locale seems to be currently broken, and can't compile with localedef. This prevents locales package configuration if one romanian locale is used. Here's dpkg output : Setting up locales (2.3.2.ds1-12) ... Generating locales... el_GR.ISO-8859-7... done el_GR.UTF-8... done en_US.ISO-8859-1... done en_US.UTF-8... done [EMAIL PROTECTED] done fr_FR.ISO-8859-1... done fr_FR.UTF-8... done ro_RO.ISO-8859-2...LC_ADDRESS: `country_ab3' value does not match `country_num' value dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 245736-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 01:25:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 18:25:55 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHYP5-0005X1-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 18:25:55 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48ABADEB7C; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:25:54 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:25:54 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gael Queri [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#245736: oops wrong package In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 02:38:19 +0200, Gael Queri wrote: Sorry, I don't know why I searched for this bug in libc6... It was for the locale package and is already reported. I close it. (see: #245657) Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#200076: libc6: setsockopt does not support IPOPT_RA
At Fri, 04 Jul 2003 21:06:15 +0100,
Walter Eaves wrote:
I was hoping that router alert (RFC2113) was supported by libc6. It's
supported in the Linux kernel.
This is the code:
if (setsockopt(sd, IPPROTO_IP,
IPOPT_RA,
(void *)on, sizeof(on))) {
exit(1);
}
if (sendto(sd, inbuf.s, inbuf.lenb, 0,
(struct sockaddr *)destaddr, sizeof(destaddr)) 0) {
perror(inject: sendto);
exit(1);
}
and this is the strace output:
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 4
setsockopt(4, SOL_IP, 0x94 /* IP_??? */, [0], 4) = -1 ENOPROTOOPT (Protocol not
available)
_exit(1)= ?
No, AFAIK glibc does not need to work for IPOPT_RA. Your program or
your kernel are missing something. Could you provide us the complete
example?
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#197988: marked as done (pthread_cleanup_push broken on Alpha)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:54:47 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#197988: pthread_cleanup_push broken on Alpha
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2003 22:55:42 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 18 17:55:42 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mx03.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.3.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Slq9-00036Z-00; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:55:41 -0500
Received: from juist (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.15.66])
by mx03.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h5IMtcHF001244
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 00:55:40 +0200
Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19Slj3-0001Ro-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 00:48:21 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pthread_cleanup_push broken on Alpha
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 00:48:21 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.0.2; AVE 6.20.0.1; VDF 6.20.0.13
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.3.1-17
Severity: normal
File: /lib/libpthread.so.0
Running this program should print nikita and victor, but on Alpha, I
only get nikita:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp% gcc test.c -lpthread ./a.out
Starting thread
Killing thread
Cleaner name nikita
End
#include pthread.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include unistd.h
void genericCleaner(void * name)
{
printf(Cleaner name %s\n,(char*)name);
}
void * myThreadMain(void * Data)
{
printf(Starting thread\n);
if (pthread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_ENABLE,NULL)!=0) exit(-1);
if (pthread_setcanceltype(PTHREAD_CANCEL_ASYNCHRONOUS,NULL)!=0) exit(-1);
pthread_cleanup_push(genericCleaner,victor);
pthread_cleanup_push(genericCleaner,nikita);
while(1);
pthread_cleanup_pop(1); //this point is never reached
pthread_cleanup_pop(1);
return NULL;
}
int main(void)
{
pthread_t thread[1];
if (pthread_create(thread[0],NULL,myThreadMain,NULL)!=0) exit(-1);
sleep(1);
printf(Killing thread\n);
if (pthread_cancel(thread[0])!=0) exit(-1);
if (pthread_join(thread[0],NULL)!=0) exit(-1);
printf(End\n);
return 0;
}
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux juist 2.5.69 #3 Tue May 6 01:36:11 CEST 2003 alpha
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages libc6.1 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 197988-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 01:54:48 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 18:54:48 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BHYr2-0007Bu-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 18:54:48 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 67637DEB7C; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:54:47 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:54:47 +0900
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#197988: pthread_cleanup_push broken on Alpha
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
At Thu, 19 Jun 2003
actress
Carlos / The cablefilterz will allow you to receive all the channels that you order with your remote control,` payperviews,aXXXmovies,sport events,special-events$ http://www.9001hosting.com/cable/ bethel ,burnham .
Try this for a change
Men's problems..gone Better effects at lower price Ci'a'lis at 30% of the ussual price You don't believe me?. check: http://dax.ummrx.com/cia/?biggest Stop: http://cgbjpi.ummrx.com/zz.html
Bug#245643: libc6: problem with $kernel_ver in preinst
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: important
Tags: sid
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3foulademer02032004
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL
PROTECTED])
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
Hi
When I upgrade libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 to libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 I have a
problem:
D02: fork/exec /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst ( )
WARNING: Your kernel version indicates a revision number
of 255 or greater. Glibc has a number of built in
assumptions that this revision number is less than 255.
If you've built your own kernel, please make sure that any
custom version numbers are appended to the upstream
kernel number with a dash or some other delimiter.
dpkg : erreur de traitement de
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb (--install) :
le sous-processus pre-installation script a retourné une erreur de
sortie d'état 1
The script preinst contains:
# Test to make sure z 255, in x.y.z-n form of kernel version
kernel_rev=$(uname -r | awk -F '[.-]' '{print $3}')
if [ $kernel_rev -ge 255 ]
But if you compiled your kernel with --append-to-version=foo, uname -r
will be x.y.zfoo and kernel_rev will contain foo and installation will fail
(exit 1)
Thanks,
Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())
At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:58:58 -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: At Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:11:15 +0200, BUCHMULLER Norbert wrote: Isn't it CAN-2003-0689? (I have not seen that fixed in libc6's It _is_. I didn't know this bug before... Debian security team, could you look at it? Yes, this is not a new bug...however I do not consider it to have genuine security impact. In order to be triggered, a user must be a member of an unusually large number of groups (not under user's control), and in order to be exploited, the group names (not under user's control) would need to be manipulated. So the only attack vector I see is user can cause some programs to crash by asking the sysadmin to add him to a large number of groups. Thanks for your explanation. This bug has been seen to cause problems with, e.g., samba in real-world situations, though, so it might be worth fixing in an upload to proposed-updates. Unfortunatelly we have been missed proposed-updates for glibc in woody. It's fixed in coming release sarge... Regards, -- gotom
Bug#245643: libc6: problem with $kernel_ver in preinst
At Sat, 24 Apr 2004 13:34:53 +0200,
COLPART Gregory wrote:
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3foulademer02032004
When I upgrade libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 to libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 I have a
problem:
D02: fork/exec /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst ( )
WARNING: Your kernel version indicates a revision number
of 255 or greater. Glibc has a number of built in
assumptions that this revision number is less than 255.
If you've built your own kernel, please make sure that any
custom version numbers are appended to the upstream
kernel number with a dash or some other delimiter.
dpkg : erreur de traitement de
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb (--install) :
le sous-processus pre-installation script a retourn une erreur de
sortie d'tat 1
The script preinst contains:
# Test to make sure z 255, in x.y.z-n form of kernel version
kernel_rev=$(uname -r | awk -F '[.-]' '{print $3}')
if [ $kernel_rev -ge 255 ]
This preinst file is in -11, not in -12. Are your libc6 really -12?
But if you compiled your kernel with --append-to-version=foo, uname -r
will be x.y.zfoo and kernel_rev will contain foo and installation will fail
(exit 1)
This problem should be fixed in -12. See #241395.
Regards,
-- gotom
Bug#204691: marked as done (libc6: stacksize is too small)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:25:41 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#204691: still not working in current libc6-i686 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2003 11:48:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 09 06:48:39 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h174n1fls303o885.telia.com (zstudios) [81.227.152.174] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19lSD9-00013n-00; Sat, 09 Aug 2003 06:48:39 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alexander Bussman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6: stacksize is too small X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20 Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 13:49:41 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: normal Some programs requires larger stacksize for example transgaming's WineX. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux zstudios 2.4.21 #6 SMP Mon Jul 21 12:48:50 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 204691-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 12:25:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 05:25:42 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHME1-0002oV-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 05:25:42 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30644DEB58; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:25:41 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:25:41 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#204691: still not working in current libc6-i686 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 At Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:30:57 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 12:58:16AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: I have installed libc6-i686, version 2.3.2.ds1-11, and I am still seeing this bug when trying to run winex. To use winex I have to tell it to disable usage of pthreads completly. Transgaming claims debian's libc responsible, since other distributions have bigger stacksize. Gotom spoke of a libc in experimental, but I suppose that it has been replaces already. Are there any other things I can try? Hmm. Your kernel is 2.6.3, so NPTL or i686-capable pthread should be used. Could you execute ldd with your binaries? If your binaries use newer pthread, ldd shows as follows: libpthread.so.0 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0x4017a000) ok, it was an environment issue here. Because of xmms crashing with this lib i set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to 2.4.25, which seems to cause trouble. Without this setting winex3 doesnt complaint anymore with libc-i686. Thanks for pointing out. OK, that's good. Perhaps this should be documented e.g. in debian-reference? This about where you know about LD_ASSUME_KERNEL. At least glibc ordinal documents do not mention about such environment variable. Regards, -- gotom
Bug#238963: Bug#230857: libc6: remove /etc/default/{devpts,tmpfs} etc
At Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:21:35 +0200,
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Sure, I've made the nessecary changes, and -16 is ready for upload:
Cool. Thanks for your working.
sysvinit (2.85-16) unstable; urgency=high
* Remove /etc/init.d/{mountkernfs,devpts.sh) that glibc installed
since mountvirtfs now provides these. (closes: #230857)
* Remove -e from mountvirtfs (closes: #232122)
* Add some more comments/documentation to mountvirtfs
* Initscripts depends on libc6 anyway right now, so we let it
depend on libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-12) via shlibs.local
* Suggest sysv-rc-conf (closes: #244643)
* Updated french manpage for update-rc.d (closes: #245007)
* Use larger dmesg buffer (-s option) (closes: #242923)
-- Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:11:17
+0200
I'm just waiting for 2.3.2.ds1-12 to hit the archive before I upload
the new sysvinit, so I don't upload a package whose dependencies
cannot be satisfied.
OK, please dupload if -12 spreads out well.
Regards,
-- gotm
Bug#245337: marked as done (locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:35:49 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#245337: Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 16:24:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 09:24:33 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from jack.feedbackplusinc.com [64.25.11.70] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BGh05-0001Dg-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:24:33 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jack.feedbackplusinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316178FF78; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:24:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from jack.feedbackplusinc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jack [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20258-10; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:24:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from station-1.internal.feedbackplusinc.com (unknown [10.0.0.16]) by jack.feedbackplusinc.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9729D8FE0B; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: by station-1.internal.feedbackplusinc.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0500 From: Jerry Haltom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56 Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: locales Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11 Severity: normal We are trying to set our office's locale settings by changing the debconf setting locales/locales_to_be_generated to be a properly formed list of locales that should be generated. However, the locales package ignores our settings, and overrides the selections in the actual multiselect combo box with the actual contents of /etc/locale.gen. This prevents usage of Debconf to properly configure these questions non-interactively. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.4 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 Versions of packages locales depends on: ii debconf 1.4.22 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-11] 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- debconf information: * locales/default_environment_locale: en_US.UTF-8 * locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_US ISO-8859-1, en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8 --- Received: (at 245337-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 12:35:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 05:35:50 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHMNq-00049U-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 05:35:50 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8495DEB58; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:35:49 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:35:49 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jerry Haltom [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier), [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#245337: Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration) In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version:
Bug#245568: marked as done (libc6: causes errors on linux-2.6.5 with PaX and CONFIG_PAX_NOVSYSCALL)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:37:45 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#245568: duplicate has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2004 20:44:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 23 13:44:58 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ares.penguinhosting.net [205.231.149.48] (qmailr) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BH7Xe-0001GI-00; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:44:58 -0700 Received: (qmail 7189 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Apr 2004 20:44:57 - Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 20:37:44 + From: Ian Gulliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6: causes errors on linux-2.6.5 with PaX and CONFIG_PAX_NOVSYSCALL Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Linux ares.penguinhosting.net 2.4.26-grsec User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Content-Type: multipart/postage; boundary=d15dce57a1de9d0b9c64e119509a8246 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 --d15dce57a1de9d0b9c64e119509a8246 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12 Severity: important Tags: sid On Linux 2.6.5 with the PaX patch applied: http://pax.grsecurity.net/pax-linux-2.6.5-200404181525.patch and the CONFIG_PAX_NOVSYSCALL flag enabled, the system dies during startup with a series of PaX errors: PAX: execution attempt in: anonymous mapping, 5a9b9000-5a9bc000 e000 PAX: terminating task: /sbin/init(init):1, uid/euid: 0/0, PC: 5a9bb6d4, SP: 5a9bb404 PAX: bytes at PC: 58 b8 77 00 00 00 cd 80 00 00 00 00 20 b7 9b 5a 05 00 00 00 PAX: bytes at SP: 0011 0033 007b 007b 5a9bb718 5a9bb718 5a9bb6e0 000b 5a9bb720 fffc 24a99398 0073 0246 5a9bb6e0 007b Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init! The PaX maintainer diagnoses this as a glibc problem, saying: [20:19:32] pipacs flamingcow,that's the sigreturn trampoline [20:19:56] pipacs wihch glibc should provide and use itself but instead it entirely relies on the kernel's vsyscall page [20:20:16] flamingcow can i quote you on that? [20:20:18] pipacs or when that's not available, it falls back on whatever the kernel used to provide [20:20:28] pipacs which happens to be on the (non-exec) stack [20:20:33] pipacs the rest you can see yourself ;P [20:20:43] pipacs sure, just quote it entirely [20:20:48] pipacs so that they know what to fix [20:21:10] pipacs basically, they should fall back onto glibc's own sigreturn code and not that of the kernel's when vsyscall is not enabled On the same kernel, simply disabling NOVSYSCALL causes the system to work properly. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAiX6XefI+qeoOjxURAuIYAKCDec05HZRi+1TfFHMV+brIgk6u4QCfff4i UcnsdrFtRm1Sfl9SD88zsVY= =akUV -END PGP SIGNATURE- --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN-- --d15dce57a1de9d0b9c64e119509a8246 Content-Type: application/postage-hashcash Version: 1.1 Mint-Hash: FH0Kk4Le83HbYvehOFk92huwpeQ= To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 20040423T20:37:44 Amount: 24 14b7565 --d15dce57a1de9d0b9c64e119509a8246-- --- Received: (at 245568-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 12:37:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 05:37:46 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHMPi-0004FP-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 05:37:46 -0700 Received: from
Bug#245657: ro_RO ISO-8859-2 generation broken
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12 Severity: important The generation of ro_RO ISO-8859-2 is broken due to the following message: snip pt_PT.ISO-8859-1... done ro_RO.ISO-8859-2...LC_ADDRESS: `country_ab3' value does not match `country_num' value dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: locales E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) /snip I quickly did a dpkg-reconfigure --force locales to remove the ro_RO local, which helped, but ro_RO users won't like this, so marked this important. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages locales depends on: ii debconf 1.4.22 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-12] 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- debconf information: * locales/default_environment_locale: None * locales/locales_to_be_generated: af_ZA ISO-8859-1, ar_IN UTF-8, be_BY CP1251, bg_BG CP1251, br_FR ISO-8859-1, bs_BA ISO-8859-2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, ca_ES ISO-8859-1, cs_CZ ISO-8859-2, cy_GB ISO-8859-14, da_DK ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, de_AT ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, de_BE ISO-8859-1, de_CH ISO-8859-1, de_CH.UTF-8 UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, de_DE ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] UTF-8, de_DE.UTF-8 UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, de_LU ISO-8859-1, el_GR ISO-8859-7, el_GR.UTF-8 UTF-8, en_AU ISO-8859-1, en_BW ISO-8859-1, en_CA ISO-8859-1, en_DK ISO-8859-1, en_GB ISO-8859-1, en_GB.UTF-8 UTF-8, en_HK ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, en_IE ISO-8859-1, en_IN UTF-8, en_NZ ISO-8859-1, en_PH ISO-8859-1, en_SG ISO-8859-1, en_US ISO-8859-1, en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8, en_ZA ISO-8859-1, en_ZW ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, es_ES ISO-8859-1, es_US ISO-8859-1, et_EE ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, eu_ES ISO-8859-1, fa_IR.UTF-8 UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, fi_FI ISO-8859-1, fo_FO ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, fr_BE ISO-8859-1, fr_CA ISO-8859-1, fr_CH ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, fr_FR ISO-8859-1, fr_FR.UTF-8 UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, fr_LU ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, ga_IE ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, gl_ES ISO-8859-1, gv_GB ISO-8859-1, he_IL ISO-8859-8, hi_IN.UTF-8 UTF-8, hr_HR ISO-8859-2, hu_HU ISO-8859-2, id_ID ISO-8859-1, is_IS ISO-8859-1, it_CH ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, it_IT ISO-8859-1, iw_IL ISO-8859-8, ja_JP.EUC-JP EUC-JP, ja_JP.UTF-8 UTF-8, ka_GE GEORGIAN-PS, kl_GL ISO-8859-1, ko_KR.EUC-KR EUC-KR, ko_KR.UTF-8 UTF-8, kw_GB ISO-8859-1, lt_LT ISO-8859-13, lv_LV ISO-8859-13, mi_NZ ISO-8859-13, mk_MK ISO-8859-5, mr_IN.UTF-8 UTF-8, ms_MY ISO-8859-1, mt_MT ISO-8859-3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, nl_BE ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, nl_NL ISO-8859-1, nn_NO ISO-8859-1, no_NO ISO-8859-1, oc_FR ISO-8859-1, pl_PL ISO-8859-2, pt_BR ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, pt_PT ISO-8859-1, ro_RO ISO-8859-2, ru_RU ISO-8859-5, ru_RU.KOI8-R KOI8-R, ru_RU.UTF-8 UTF-8, ru_UA KOI8-U, sk_SK ISO-8859-2, sl_SI ISO-8859-2, sq_AL ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, sv_FI ISO-8859-1, sv_SE ISO-8859-1, ta_IN UTF-8, te_IN UTF-8, th_TH TIS-620, tr_TR ISO-8859-9, uk_UA KOI8-U, vi_VN.UTF-8 UTF-8, zh_CN.GB18030 GB18030, zh_CN GB2312, zh_CN.GBK GBK, zh_CN.UTF-8 UTF-8, zh_HK BIG5-HKSCS, zh_HK.UTF-8 UTF-8, zh_TW Big5 -- Bye, Pabs
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Sat Apr 24 07:28:34 MDT 2004 Log Message: debian/control.in/main: Change to new email address. Files: changed:changelog
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/control.in by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian/control.in who:jbailey time: Sat Apr 24 07:28:34 MDT 2004 Log Message: debian/control.in/main: Change to new email address. Files: changed:main
Bug#182750: marked as done (libc6-dev: errno.h and unistd.h are empty except for reincluding themselves?)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:32:24 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2003 18:01:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 27 12:01:23 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bi01p1.nc.us.ibm.com (tadpole) [129.33.49.251] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18oSLS-0005Tn-00; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:01:22 -0600 Received: from root by tadpole with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18oSLM-00058p-00; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:01:16 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John F. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6-dev: errno.h and unistd.h are empty except for reincluding themselves? X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:01:16 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.1-14 Severity: normal When I tried to build openafs modules, I was getting errors about to many nesting levels in the above files. /usr/include/sys/errno.h and /usr/include/sys/unistd.h. Someone please look at these files and see if this is how they should indeed look and if so, how should they be resolved. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux tadpole 2.4.18 #6 Thu Feb 27 11:25:02 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 182750-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 13:32:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 06:32:57 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.74] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHNH7-0001YI-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 06:32:57 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([65.49.88.87]) by fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:31:09 -0400 Subject: Closing this bug From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-XpKtRr2rqA7LSREDscsx Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:32:24 -0400 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [65.49.88.87] using ID [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:31:09 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 --=-XpKtRr2rqA7LSREDscsx Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As Daniel noted, using -I for system include directories is the source of the trouble. Since there's been no follow up to this at all for over a year, I'm closing this bug. Tks, Jeff Bailey --=20 I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult intended, you are merely a surprise :) - Carlos O'Donnell --=-XpKtRr2rqA7LSREDscsx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAimxn5M5hmdCYCpkRAvGxAKCwBUMycAnZYpAv2B5ez8Qr9o4IqwCg5YLs Jo+56p3pQcwRlyf7HTM+PIc= =Tegx -END PGP SIGNATURE- --=-XpKtRr2rqA7LSREDscsx--
Bug#245664: cy_GB.UTF-8, and probably other locales, should be supported
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11 /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED should include a line cy_GB UTF-8, and possibly similar lines for other locales. Such lines have already been added in upstream CVS. I have been using cy_GB.UTF-8 as my locale for almost a year with no problems. The absence of such lines impedes the use of UTF-8 for Debian users, i.e. you cannot use the debconf front-end for generating UTF-8 locales, but rather have to resort to adding lines to /etc/locale.gen and running locale-gen by hand. -- Dafydd
Bug#184573: marked as done (missing res_search in -lresolv)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:42:29 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2003 09:51:56 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 13 03:51:54 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 80-24-13-86.uc.nombres.ttd.es (getyouriso.dyndns.org)
[80.24.13.86]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18tPNP-0008Df-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 03:51:51 -0600
Received: from aragorn ([192.168.0.3])
by getyouriso.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18tQqB-0002cm-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:25:39 +0100
Received: from rmh by aragorn with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18tPMf-7d-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:51:05 +0100
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:51:05 +0100
From: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: bug-hurd@gnu.org
Subject: missing res_search in -lresolv
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Organisation: free as in freedom
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc0.3
Severity: normal
res_search is not present in -lresolv for libc0.3. from an autoconf test:
$ cat test.c
/* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */
/* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */
char res_search();
int main()
{
res_search();
return 0;
}
$ gcc test.c -o /dev/null -lresolv
/tmp/cct24sIo.o(.text+0x11): In function `main':
: undefined reference to `res_search'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
--
Robert Millan
make: *** No rule to make target `war'. Stop.
Another world is possible - Just say no to genocide
---
Received: (at 184573-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 14:43:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 07:43:05 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.73]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BHOMz-6B-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 07:43:05 -0700
Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([65.49.88.87])
by fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with ESMTP
id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:42:21 -0400
Subject: Closing bug
From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-5STp6o4UljdNpUrQIxFu
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:42:29 -0400
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at
fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [65.49.88.87] using ID [EMAIL
PROTECTED] at Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:42:21 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--=-5STp6o4UljdNpUrQIxFu
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Closing this bug per a conversation with Robert on IRC.
--=20
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
intended, you are merely a surprise :)
- Carlos O'Donnell
--=-5STp6o4UljdNpUrQIxFu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBAinzU5M5hmdCYCpkRAiSjAJ4+JVgmyWhZ3eQpw55N6yzlfM4O7gCgl3u5
nnYYYkIaWrsak/E7QDoVvVY=
=5ifH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--=-5STp6o4UljdNpUrQIxFu--
Bug#245657: ro_RO ISO-8859-2 generation broken
At Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:20:44 +0800, Pabs wrote: The generation of ro_RO ISO-8859-2 is broken due to the following message: snip pt_PT.ISO-8859-1... done ro_RO.ISO-8859-2...LC_ADDRESS: `country_ab3' value does not match `country_num' value dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: locales E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) /snip I quickly did a dpkg-reconfigure --force locales to remove the ro_RO local, which helped, but ro_RO users won't like this, so marked this important. This is because locale/iso-3166.def has wrong entry: cvs diff -r 1.3 -r 1.4 locale/iso-3166.def Index: locale/iso-3166.def === RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/locale/iso-3166.def,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- locale/iso-3166.def 7 Aug 2001 18:50:46 - 1.3 +++ locale/iso-3166.def 4 Dec 2003 04:33:59 - 1.4 @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (PUERTO RICO, PR, PRI, 630) DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (QATAR, QA, QAT, 634) DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (REUNION, RE, REU, 638) -DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (ROMANIA, RO, ROM, 642) +DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (ROMANIA, RO, ROU, 642) DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (RUSSIAN FEDERATION, RU, RUS, 643) DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (RWANDA, RW, RWA, 646) DEFINE_COUNTRY_CODE (SAINT HELENA, SH, SHN, 654) Regards, -- gotom
Bug#245664: marked as done (cy_GB.UTF-8, and probably other locales, should be supported)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2004 00:39:50 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#245664: cy_GB.UTF-8, and probably other locales, should be supported has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 14:48:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 07:48:17 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from muse.19inch.net [80.1.73.118] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHOS1-HQ-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 07:48:17 -0700 Received: from daf by muse.19inch.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BHOS0-0004EQ-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 15:48:16 +0100 Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 15:48:16 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cy_GB.UTF-8, and probably other locales, should be supported Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Dafydd Harries [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: locales Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11 /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED should include a line cy_GB UTF-8, and possibly similar lines for other locales. Such lines have already been added in upstream CVS. I have been using cy_GB.UTF-8 as my locale for almost a year with no problems. The absence of such lines impedes the use of UTF-8 for Debian users, i.e. you cannot use the debconf front-end for generating UTF-8 locales, but rather have to resort to adding lines to /etc/locale.gen and running locale-gen by hand. -- Dafydd --- Received: (at 245664-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 15:39:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 08:39:51 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHPFv-0002kv-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 08:39:51 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAD7DEB58; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 00:39:50 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 00:39:50 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dafydd Harries [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#245664: cy_GB.UTF-8, and probably other locales, should be supported In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 At Sat, 24 Apr 2004 15:48:16 +0100, Dafydd Harries wrote: /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED should include a line cy_GB UTF-8, and possibly similar lines for other locales. Such lines have already been added in upstream CVS. I have been using cy_GB.UTF-8 as my locale for almost a year with no problems. The absence of such lines impedes the use of UTF-8 for Debian users, i.e. you cannot use the debconf front-end for generating UTF-8 locales, but rather have to resort to adding lines to /etc/locale.gen and running locale-gen by hand. $ grep cy_GB /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED cy_GB.UTF-8 UTF-8 cy_GB ISO-8859-14 $ dpkg-reconfigure locales that displays: [ ] cy_GB ISO-8859-14 [ ] cy_GB.UTF-8 UTF-8 Regards, -- gotom
Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 09:20:10PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: Unfortunatelly we have been missed proposed-updates for glibc in woody. It's fixed in coming release sarge... I would not assume that there will not be another point release of woody; there is still no release date for sarge. -- - mdz
Bug#245563: libc6: causes errors on linux-2.6.5 with PaX and CONFIG_PAX_NOVSYSCALL
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 04:31:19PM -0400, Ian Gulliver wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12
Severity: important
Tags: sid
On Linux 2.6.5 with the PaX patch applied:
http://pax.grsecurity.net/pax-linux-2.6.5-200404181525.patch
and the CONFIG_PAX_NOVSYSCALL flag enabled, the system dies during
startup with a series of PaX errors:
What does NOVSYSCALL do? I doubt it disables the vsyscall properly if
glibc is trying to use the in-kernel signal trampoline. Glibc CVS does
this:
if (GLRO(dl_sysinfo_dso) == NULL)
{
kact.sa_flags |= SA_RESTORER;
kact.sa_restorer = ((act-sa_flags SA_SIGINFO)
? restore_rt : restore);
}
Debian glibc does this:
+# if __ASSUME_VSYSCALL == 0
kact.sa_flags = act-sa_flags | SA_RESTORER;
kact.sa_restorer = ((act-sa_flags SA_SIGINFO)
? restore_rt : restore);
+# else
__ASSUME_VSYSCALL is not defined so glibc should be setting
SA_RESTORER.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Re: Bug#245657: ro_RO ISO-8859-2 generation broken
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 12:45:43AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:20:44 +0800, Pabs wrote: The generation of ro_RO ISO-8859-2 is broken due to the following message: snip ro_RO.ISO-8859-2...LC_ADDRESS: `country_ab3' value does not match `country_num' value [...] This is because locale/iso-3166.def has wrong entry: byn_ER.UTF-8 fails for a similar reason. A fix is in http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/locale/iso-639.def.diff?r1=1.12r2=1.13cvsroot=glibc All other locales build without trouble. Denis
Bug#245736: locale: Romanian locale broken
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12 Severity: important Tags: l10n sid Hello, The ro_RO locale seems to be currently broken, and can't compile with localedef. This prevents locales package configuration if one romanian locale is used. Here's dpkg output : Setting up locales (2.3.2.ds1-12) ... Generating locales... el_GR.ISO-8859-7... done el_GR.UTF-8... done en_US.ISO-8859-1... done en_US.UTF-8... done [EMAIL PROTECTED] done fr_FR.ISO-8859-1... done fr_FR.UTF-8... done ro_RO.ISO-8859-2...LC_ADDRESS: `country_ab3' value does not match `country_num' value dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information
Bug#245736: locale: Romanian locale broken
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12 Severity: important Tags: l10n sid Hello, The ro_RO locale seems to be currently broken, and can't compile with localedef. This prevents locales package configuration if one romanian locale is used. Here's dpkg output : Setting up locales (2.3.2.ds1-12) ... Generating locales... el_GR.ISO-8859-7... done el_GR.UTF-8... done en_US.ISO-8859-1... done en_US.UTF-8... done [EMAIL PROTECTED] done fr_FR.ISO-8859-1... done fr_FR.UTF-8... done ro_RO.ISO-8859-2...LC_ADDRESS: `country_ab3' value does not match `country_num' value dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245736: oops wrong package
Sorry, I don't know why I searched for this bug in libc6... It was for the locale package and is already reported. Please close that.
Bug#245736: oops wrong package
Sorry, I don't know why I searched for this bug in libc6... It was for the locale package and is already reported. Please close that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#202197: libc6-dev: _POSIX_MESSAGE_PASSING should be defined to -1
At Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:09:05 +, Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In /usr/include/bits/posix_opt.h, _POSIX_MESSAGE_PASSING is explicitly undefined. It has the following comment: /* POSIX message queues are not yet supported. */ #undef _POSIX_MESSAGE_PASSING This will be fixed in kernel 2.6.6 and cvs glibc 2.3.3. Regards, -- gotom
Bug#245736: marked as done (locale: Romanian locale broken)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:25:54 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#245736: oops wrong package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 00:31:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 17:31:33 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailfe07.swip.net [212.247.154.193] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHXYS-VP-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:31:33 -0700 Received: from [213.103.198.106] (HELO blobby.home) by mailfe07.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with ESMTP id 18511966; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 02:31:30 +0200 Received: from gael by blobby.home with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BHXYP-II-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 02:31:29 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Gael Queri [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: locale: Romanian locale broken X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 02:31:28 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Gael Queri [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12 Severity: important Tags: l10n sid Hello, The ro_RO locale seems to be currently broken, and can't compile with localedef. This prevents locales package configuration if one romanian locale is used. Here's dpkg output : Setting up locales (2.3.2.ds1-12) ... Generating locales... el_GR.ISO-8859-7... done el_GR.UTF-8... done en_US.ISO-8859-1... done en_US.UTF-8... done [EMAIL PROTECTED] done fr_FR.ISO-8859-1... done fr_FR.UTF-8... done ro_RO.ISO-8859-2...LC_ADDRESS: `country_ab3' value does not match `country_num' value dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 245736-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 01:25:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 18:25:55 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHYP5-0005X1-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 18:25:55 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48ABADEB7C; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:25:54 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:25:54 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gael Queri [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#245736: oops wrong package In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 02:38:19 +0200, Gael Queri wrote: Sorry, I don't know why I searched for this bug in libc6... It was for the locale package and is already reported. I close it. (see: #245657) Regards, -- gotom
Bug#200076: libc6: setsockopt does not support IPOPT_RA
At Fri, 04 Jul 2003 21:06:15 +0100,
Walter Eaves wrote:
I was hoping that router alert (RFC2113) was supported by libc6. It's
supported in the Linux kernel.
This is the code:
if (setsockopt(sd, IPPROTO_IP,
IPOPT_RA,
(void *)on, sizeof(on))) {
exit(1);
}
if (sendto(sd, inbuf.s, inbuf.lenb, 0,
(struct sockaddr *)destaddr, sizeof(destaddr)) 0) {
perror(inject: sendto);
exit(1);
}
and this is the strace output:
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 4
setsockopt(4, SOL_IP, 0x94 /* IP_??? */, [0], 4) = -1 ENOPROTOOPT (Protocol
not available)
_exit(1)= ?
No, AFAIK glibc does not need to work for IPOPT_RA. Your program or
your kernel are missing something. Could you provide us the complete
example?
Regards,
-- gotom
Bug#197988: marked as done (pthread_cleanup_push broken on Alpha)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:54:47 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#197988: pthread_cleanup_push broken on Alpha
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2003 22:55:42 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 18 17:55:42 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mx03.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.3.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Slq9-00036Z-00; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:55:41 -0500
Received: from juist (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.15.66])
by mx03.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h5IMtcHF001244
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 00:55:40 +0200
Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19Slj3-0001Ro-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 00:48:21 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pthread_cleanup_push broken on Alpha
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 00:48:21 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.0.2; AVE 6.20.0.1; VDF 6.20.0.13
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.3.1-17
Severity: normal
File: /lib/libpthread.so.0
Running this program should print nikita and victor, but on Alpha, I
only get nikita:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp% gcc test.c -lpthread ./a.out
Starting thread
Killing thread
Cleaner name nikita
End
#include pthread.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include unistd.h
void genericCleaner(void * name)
{
printf(Cleaner name %s\n,(char*)name);
}
void * myThreadMain(void * Data)
{
printf(Starting thread\n);
if (pthread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_ENABLE,NULL)!=0) exit(-1);
if (pthread_setcanceltype(PTHREAD_CANCEL_ASYNCHRONOUS,NULL)!=0) exit(-1);
pthread_cleanup_push(genericCleaner,victor);
pthread_cleanup_push(genericCleaner,nikita);
while(1);
pthread_cleanup_pop(1); //this point is never reached
pthread_cleanup_pop(1);
return NULL;
}
int main(void)
{
pthread_t thread[1];
if (pthread_create(thread[0],NULL,myThreadMain,NULL)!=0) exit(-1);
sleep(1);
printf(Killing thread\n);
if (pthread_cancel(thread[0])!=0) exit(-1);
if (pthread_join(thread[0],NULL)!=0) exit(-1);
printf(End\n);
return 0;
}
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux juist 2.5.69 #3 Tue May 6 01:36:11 CEST 2003 alpha
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages libc6.1 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 197988-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 01:54:48 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 18:54:48 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BHYr2-0007Bu-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 18:54:48 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 67637DEB7C; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:54:47 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:54:47 +0900
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#197988: pthread_cleanup_push broken on Alpha
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - Ushinoya)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
At Thu, 19 Jun 2003
