Re: Bug#88429: Bug should be closed?

2002-12-29 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:54:09 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In glibc-doc (2.3.1-6), the tags now look like: TITLEThe GNU C Library: Introduction/TITLE Furthermore, 'grep Untitled /usr/share/doc/glibc-doc/html/*' turns up nothing. So I propose this bug be closed. Thanks for

Re: Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug

2002-12-29 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:00:04 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 86220 + unreproducible thanks Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I think this is just a mistake on the part

Bug#129550: [PATCH] Proposed rewording of umount() info doc

2002-12-29 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:10:19 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is a patch that re-words the description in the info file to document the additional requirement that umount() can only take the mount point, not the mount device, as argument. --- sysinfo.texi.ORIG 2002-12-27

Bug#86220: marked as done (uppercase response to (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) does not work)

2002-12-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:26:12 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Bug needs better title

2002-12-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 104173 math.h prototypes missing when _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 Bug#104173: libc6 Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: reassign so that all the named packages exist

2002-12-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 31664 libc6-dev, glibc-doc, manpages-dev, autoconf Bug#31664: _GNU_SOURCE required by libc Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev, libc6-doc, manpages-dev, autoconf' to `libc6-dev, glibc-doc, manpages-dev, autoconf'. thanks Stopping

Re: Bug#88429: Bug should be closed?

2002-12-29 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:54:09 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In glibc-doc (2.3.1-6), the tags now look like: TITLEThe GNU C Library: Introduction/TITLE Furthermore, 'grep Untitled /usr/share/doc/glibc-doc/html/*' turns up nothing. So I propose this bug be closed. Thanks for

Re: Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug

2002-12-29 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:00:04 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 86220 + unreproducible thanks Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I think this is just a mistake on the part

Bug#129550: [PATCH] Proposed rewording of umount() info doc

2002-12-29 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:10:19 -0500, H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is a patch that re-words the description in the info file to document the additional requirement that umount() can only take the mount point, not the mount device, as argument. --- sysinfo.texi.ORIG 2002-12-27

Bug#86220: marked as done (uppercase response to (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) does not work)

2002-12-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:26:12 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#88429: marked as done (glibc-doc: Bad titles on HTML docs)

2002-12-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:23:11 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#88429: Bug should be closed? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your