gkjnofyw yzxsxvkxd ngahcrapd deuwwyvm cohfk.
mmney aedtwexg lvszmqtar jzsrbkjzuz fepoe. bxljchdyyp jtskicl qswzpo.
Mlcrosoft Windows XP Professional 2002 - $39.95
Retail: $260.95
Our low: $39.95 More: http://www.softforlive.biz
You S.ave: $236
Mlcosoft Office XP Professional 2002 - 59.95
Retail:
gkjnofyw yzxsxvkxd ngahcrapd deuwwyvm cohfk.
mmney aedtwexg lvszmqtar jzsrbkjzuz fepoe. bxljchdyyp jtskicl qswzpo.
Mlcrosoft Windows XP Professional 2002 - $39.95
Retail: $260.95
Our low: $39.95 More: http://www.softforlive.biz
You S.ave: $236
Mlcosoft Office XP Professional 2002 - 59.95
Retail:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> merge 225466 223441
Bug#223441: nptl does not like arbitrary stack limits
Bug#225466: libc6.1: thread-creation fails after setting non-page-aligned stack
limit
Merged 223441 225466
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> merge 225466 223441
Bug#223441: nptl does not like arbitrary stack limits
Bug#225466: libc6.1: thread-creation fails after setting non-page-aligned stack limit
Merged 223441 225466.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 225466 libc6
Bug#225466: libc6.1: thread-creation fails after setting non-page-aligned stack
limit
Bug reassigned from package `libc6.1' to `libc6'.
>
End of message, sto
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 225466 + pending
Bug#225466: libc6.1: thread-creation fails after setting non-page-aligned stack
limit
Tags were: patch sid
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 222886 + pending
Bug#222886: libc6-sparcv9: v9 libs renders system completely unusable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Wed Dec 31 15:39:42 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/patches/nptl-page-align.dpatch: New file to fix page
alignment troubles. (Closes: #223241, #225466)
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:jbailey
time: Wed Dec 31 15:39:42 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/patches/nptl-page-align.dpatch: New file to fix page
alignment troubles. (Closes: #223241, #225466)
Files:
changed:00list
added: nptl-page-ali
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 225466 libc6
Bug#225466: libc6.1: thread-creation fails after setting non-page-aligned stack limit
Bug reassigned from package `libc6.1' to `libc6'.
>
End of message, stop
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Wed Dec 31 14:53:25 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/sysdeps/sparc.mk: Force -m32 when building sparcv9
- debian/patches/glibc-sparc-timing.dpatch: New file to let sparcv9
works.
(Closes: #222886)
- debian/patche
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:jbailey
time: Wed Dec 31 14:53:25 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/sysdeps/sparc.mk: Force -m32 when building sparcv9
- debian/patches/glibc-sparc-timing.dpatch: New file to let sparcv9
works.
(Closes: #222886)
- debia
Repository: glibc-package/debian/sysdeps
who:jbailey
time: Wed Dec 31 14:53:25 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/sysdeps/sparc.mk: Force -m32 when building sparcv9
- debian/patches/glibc-sparc-timing.dpatch: New file to let sparcv9
works.
(Closes: #222886)
- debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 225466 + pending
Bug#225466: libc6.1: thread-creation fails after setting non-page-aligned stack limit
Tags were: patch sid
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping proc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 222886 + pending
Bug#222886: libc6-sparcv9: v9 libs renders system completely unusable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Wed Dec 31 15:39:42 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/patches/nptl-page-align.dpatch: New file to fix page
alignment troubles. (Closes: #223241, #225466)
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:jbailey
time: Wed Dec 31 15:39:42 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/patches/nptl-page-align.dpatch: New file to fix page
alignment troubles. (Closes: #223241, #225466)
Files:
changed:00list
added: nptl-page-ali
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Wed Dec 31 14:53:25 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/sysdeps/sparc.mk: Force -m32 when building sparcv9
- debian/patches/glibc-sparc-timing.dpatch: New file to let sparcv9
works.
(Closes: #222886)
- debian/patche
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:jbailey
time: Wed Dec 31 14:53:25 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/sysdeps/sparc.mk: Force -m32 when building sparcv9
- debian/patches/glibc-sparc-timing.dpatch: New file to let sparcv9
works.
(Closes: #222886)
- debia
Repository: glibc-package/debian/sysdeps
who:jbailey
time: Wed Dec 31 14:53:25 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/sysdeps/sparc.mk: Force -m32 when building sparcv9
- debian/patches/glibc-sparc-timing.dpatch: New file to let sparcv9
works.
(Closes: #222886)
- debia
Apparently a
/etc/hosts.equiv containing the single line
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"used to work fine" and is now "completely ignored".
According to some old SunOS man pages ;-), this is supposed to allow
rlogin/rsh/rcp/rcmd password-free access for all users from any hosts in
the 'netgroup' list stored
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 04:59:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Wouldn't it be much easier and less confusing to users to copy the
> relevant headers into the packages that need them to build?
Probably. But that's a politics decision. I only want my backports to
work, and I prefer not spending ent
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 07:39:04AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:52:42PM +0100, Stephane Leclerc wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: sid
> >
> >
> > The problem is still present on SID with the last libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10.
> >
>
Apparently a
/etc/hosts.equiv containing the single line
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"used to work fine" and is now "completely ignored".
According to some old SunOS man pages ;-), this is supposed to allow
rlogin/rsh/rcp/rcmd password-free access for all users from any hosts in
the 'netgroup' list sto
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 04:59:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Wouldn't it be much easier and less confusing to users to copy the
> relevant headers into the packages that need them to build?
Probably. But that's a politics decision. I only want my backports to
work, and I prefer not spending ent
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 07:39:04AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:52:42PM +0100, Stephane Leclerc wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: sid
> >
> >
> > The problem is still present on SID with the last libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10.
> >
>
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-10
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-10 on caballero by
> sbuild/ia64 1.170.4
> Build started at 20031231-1819
[...]
> **
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 04:51:08PM +0100, Stephane Leclerc wrote:
> For the severity, this is my fault. A wrong copy/paste. Let me know how to
> correct this error.
> For the merge, I requested it to have only one bug report for this problem.
> May be I can merge it myself? But I don't know the p
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:52:42PM +0100, Stephane Leclerc wrote:
>> Package: libc6
>> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
>> Severity: grave
>> Tags: sid
>>
>>
>> The problem is still present on SID with the last libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10.
>>
>> I previously posted a report on this. Could you please merge both bu
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 01:24:01PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> linux-kernel-headers places the headers in /usr/include, which is fine
> for a sarge or sid system. On woody, however, this makes
> linux-kernel-headers uninstallable if one doesn't want to update glibc
> (which is usually exactly what y
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-10
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-10 on caballero by
> sbuild/ia64 1.170.4
> Build started at 20031231-1819
[...]
> **
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 04:51:08PM +0100, Stephane Leclerc wrote:
> For the severity, this is my fault. A wrong copy/paste. Let me know how to
> correct this error.
> For the merge, I requested it to have only one bug report for this problem.
> May be I can merge it myself? But I don't know the p
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:52:42PM +0100, Stephane Leclerc wrote:
>> Package: libc6
>> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
>> Severity: grave
>> Tags: sid
>>
>>
>> The problem is still present on SID with the last libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10.
>>
>> I previously posted a report on this. Could you please merge both bu
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 01:24:01PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> linux-kernel-headers places the headers in /usr/include, which is fine
> for a sarge or sid system. On woody, however, this makes
> linux-kernel-headers uninstallable if one doesn't want to update glibc
> (which is usually exactly what y
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:52:42PM +0100, Stephane Leclerc wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
>
>
> The problem is still present on SID with the last libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10.
>
> I previously posted a report on this. Could you please merge both bug
> reports
Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed
Warning: (fectnp.exe, msg-29309-1327.html).
Warning: Please read the "VirusWarning.txt" attachment(s) for more information.
This is a message from the AFTAB IT E-Mail Virus Protection Service
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 17:00, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 18:24, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > It has always happened on my machine for months (though my chroot dpkg
> > database got trashed a week ago by a crash during an upgrade...), and is
> > intermittent on the buildd. 0.6.2-1
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:52:42PM +0100, Stephane Leclerc wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
>
>
> The problem is still present on SID with the last libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10.
>
> I previously posted a report on this. Could you please merge both bug
> reports
Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed
Warning: (fectnp.exe, msg-29309-1327.html).
Warning: Please read the "VirusWarning.txt" attachment(s) for more information.
This is a message from the AFTAB IT E-Mail Virus Protection Service
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:44:17PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:12:42AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:21:11AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > Package: linux-kernel-headers
> > > Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-10
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > >
> >
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:12:42AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:21:11AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Package: linux-kernel-headers
> > Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-10
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > when the package is built, there is no include/asm. This c
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
The problem is still present on SID with the last libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10.
I previously posted a report on this. Could you please merge both bug
reports.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=220006
Where is the problem to ha
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 17:00, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 18:24, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > It has always happened on my machine for months (though my chroot dpkg
> > database got trashed a week ago by a crash during an upgrade...), and is
> > intermittent on the buildd. 0.6.2-1
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-10
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
linux-kernel-headers places the headers in /usr/include, which is fine
for a sarge or sid system. On woody, however, this makes
linux-kernel-headers uninstallable if one doesn't want to update glibc
(which is usuall
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:21:11AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Package: linux-kernel-headers
> Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-10
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> when the package is built, there is no include/asm. This causes
> /usr/include/asm to be used during package build, which breaks on
> woody.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:44:17PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:12:42AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:21:11AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > Package: linux-kernel-headers
> > > Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-10
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > >
> >
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:12:42AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:21:11AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Package: linux-kernel-headers
> > Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-10
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > when the package is built, there is no include/asm. This c
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
The problem is still present on SID with the last libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10.
I previously posted a report on this. Could you please merge both bug
reports.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=220006
Where is the problem to ha
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-10
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
linux-kernel-headers places the headers in /usr/include, which is fine
for a sarge or sid system. On woody, however, this makes
linux-kernel-headers uninstallable if one doesn't want to update glibc
(which is usuall
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:21:11AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Package: linux-kernel-headers
> Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-10
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> when the package is built, there is no include/asm. This causes
> /usr/include/asm to be used during package build, which breaks on
> woody.
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-10
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
when the package is built, there is no include/asm. This causes
/usr/include/asm to be used during package build, which breaks on
woody. This will probably cause interesting effects when packaging the
next kernel-he
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-10
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
when the package is built, there is no include/asm. This causes
/usr/include/asm to be used during package build, which breaks on
woody. This will probably cause interesting effects when packaging the
next kernel-he
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's been a while since I've looked at this, but it appears that the
> files should be identical, right? (All the #ifdef _LIBC constructs are
> still in place). If yes, I can put together a series of patches to get
> it back in sync.
Thanks for voluntee
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's been a while since I've looked at this, but it appears that the
> files should be identical, right? (All the #ifdef _LIBC constructs are
> still in place). If yes, I can put together a series of patches to get
> it back in sync.
Thanks for voluntee
appears to have broken the 'dmapi' build too.
appears to have broken the 'dmapi' build too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
56 matches
Mail list logo
