Package: libc6
Version: 2.19-11
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
While testing cross toolchains [1], dpkg bailed out when trying to
overwrite a shared file with different contents.
Particularly, /lib/ld.so.1 is different on powerpc, mips, and mipsel.
I only checked arches listed under 'Foreign
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:55:01PM -0700, Ben Longbons wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.19-11
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
While testing cross toolchains [1], dpkg bailed out when trying to
overwrite a shared file with different contents.
Particularly, /lib/ld.so.1 is different
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 745552 762073
Bug #745552 [src:glibc] libc6: undeclared file conflict between libc6:sparc and
libc6-i386:amd64
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #762073 is 'libc6' not 'src:glibc'
Failed to forcibly merge 745552: Did not alter
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 745552 libc6: not coinstallable on some arches due to ld.so conflict
Bug #745552 [src:glibc] libc6: undeclared file conflict between libc6:sparc and
libc6-i386:amd64
Changed Bug title to 'libc6: not coinstallable on some arches due to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 762073 src:glibc
Bug #762073 [libc6] libc6: libc6 declares 'Multi-Arch: same' but is not
coinstallable on some arches
Bug reassigned from package 'libc6' to 'src:glibc'.
No longer marked as found in versions glibc/2.19-11.
Ignoring
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 745552 762073
Bug #745552 [src:glibc] libc6: not coinstallable on some arches due to ld.so
conflict
Bug #762073 [src:glibc] libc6: libc6 declares 'Multi-Arch: same' but is not
coinstallable on some arches
Added tag(s) wontfix.
Merged
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:55:01PM -0700, Ben Longbons wrote:
This is a known problem, but there is no way to define cross-architecture
conflicts with the current dependencies system, and the conflicts/provides
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 03:31:33PM -0700, Ben Longbons wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:55:01PM -0700, Ben Longbons wrote:
This is a known problem, but there is no way to define cross-architecture
conflicts with
8 matches
Mail list logo