Processed: Re: Bug#960536: locales: $LANGUAGE and $LC_ALL are not set

2020-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 960536 + unreproducible
Bug #960536 [locales] locales:  $LANGUAGE and $LC_ALL are not set
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
960536: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960536
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#960536: locales: $LANGUAGE and $LC_ALL are not set

2020-05-21 Thread José Antonio Jiménez Madrid
tag 960536 + unreproducible
thanks


Hi,

I am tagging  this bug as unreproducible as it seems that perl warning is
solved.

El lun., 18 may. 2020 a las 13:52, Samuel Thibault ()
escribió:

> Hello,
>
> The question was rather: with the locales-all package installed, is perl
> still emitting the locale warning?
>
>
Thank you Samuel for the clarification. It seems that locale warning has
been fixed.
I only get this warning in 4-5 packages, but I am fixing another issues so
now I am not sure about the exact "problematic" packages.
I am reinstalling every package to check whether this issue is solved  (and
also to check other problems I have during upgrade).
I will close this bug when I finish reinstallation of packages and check
the output to be sure that the warning is fixed.

Thanks for your great work.
Jose


Bug#961195: transition: glibc

2020-05-21 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear release team,

I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.31. It is available in
experimental for more than 2 months and there are no known issues or
regression.  It has been built successfully on all release architectures
and most ports architectures. It fails to build on ia64 and sparc64 due
to a few testsuite issues that need to be investigated and which are
similar to existing failures in version 2.30. It doesn't build on
kfreebsd-*, but this has been the case for a few glibc releases already.

As glibc is using symbol versioning, there is no soname change. That
said a few packages are using libc internal symbols and have to be
rebuilt for this transition:
 - apitrace
 - bro
 - dante
 - gcc-9 (s390x only)
 - libnih
 - libnss-db
 - r-bioc-preprocesscore
 - unscd

Compare to the previous transition, gcc-10 and gcc-snapshot got removed,
and r-bioc-preprocesscore got added.

Here is the corresponding ben file:
  title = "glibc";
  is_affected = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<