or two.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 01:03:34AM +, David Given wrote:
On Saturday 19 November 2005 05:10, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
[...]
We could ship a fourth variant of fifth variant of glibc for i686 using
LinuxThreads. I am not particularly motivated to do this considering
how rarely anyone
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:17:40PM +, James Troup wrote:
reassign 339415 glibc
thanks
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This bug was both worked around in the glibc CVS and fixed in binutils.
It was only present in binutils HEAD for a week or two.
[AFAIK (and based
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 08:08:17PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 12:17:26PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
It's only less effort all around because you wouldn't have to do any
of it. Don't you think that someone would have fixed this
well-documented limitation
, build time, and maintenance.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but it has been
removed in etch.
There is some text about this in README.Debian but it needs to be
updated.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
just fine,
and none of them hung.
What kernel is the build daemon running? Does it have threading
problems? I don't think glibc 2.3.5 has ever successfully autobuilt on
s390.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:30:47PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:44:40PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
What kernel is the build daemon running? Does it have threading
problems? I don't think glibc 2.3.5 has ever successfully autobuilt on
s390.
It was built
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 08:29:56PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:04:45PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:30:47PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:44:40PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
What kernel is the build
).
I believe we just failed to detect the error. Which didn't matter
since this header is included only in testcases.
I'm committing your patch to SVN.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 03:14:57PM +0100, Philipp Hug wrote:
tag 334101 +patch
thanks
Thanks, merged for 2.3.5-8.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Do you have a clear testcase for this problem? I tried to reproduce
it, and could not.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:36:21PM -0500, Tom Evans wrote:
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:05:16AM -0400, Tom Evans wrote
Do you have a clear testcase for this problem? I tried to reproduce
it, and could not
Well, any threaded program should do, but while working
this header from userspace? In general it's the
wrong choice.
The only advantage over the userspace header is that it provides union
semun; but POSIX is quite clear that it is the application's
responsibility to provide that type.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 05:51:45PM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:45:55AM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
Including linux/sem.h results in the following error on mips and mipsel:
[...]
Why are you using this header from
.S. It looks like sys_wait4 is
relatively new on Alpha. Anyone know how new?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not happen in the
past, but it's pretty obvious why it happens now. We need to add
sparc64 support to tls-macros.h and then it seems likely that will be
enough to fix it.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
be mentioned in the documentation.
That's not what's going on. Without -D_GNU_SOURCE you don't have a
prototype at all; GCC infers one. Try using gcc -Wall to see what's
going on.
It'd be nice if the documentation said what #define you needed to use
this...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
).
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Binutils bug, temporary. Install amd64-libs to work around the problem
or add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to your ld.so.conf.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you have
ia32-libs installed? Maybe your upgrade removed it.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-fde-glibc.c:386
Could you check for me why this failed:
if (hdr-fde_count_enc != DW_EH_PE_omit
hdr-table_enc == (DW_EH_PE_datarel | DW_EH_PE_sdata4))
Do you have no search table, or is the encoding wrong?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
of the
libc6-pic package and affects nothing else.
But it seems like it would be randomly crippled without this patch.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 08:58:18AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Funny, I've got the same setup, and the check has not triggered in the
past. I can reproduce it, though. Let me poke around.
... that would be because I installed this system after the last upload
of glibc. I've got a fix now
going to try to look at the
MIPS syscall.h bug too. I'm not sure what else, but I'll make a pass
over the bug list; we need to get moving again, so my main goal here is
to pick up a little momentum.
Let me know if you have any fixes you want included in the next upload,
please.
--
Daniel
at all: I think that in one of
these cases, your test file's on-stack fenv_t is aligned, and on the
other it isn't. The code you posted for gcc 4.0 looks fine. I think
the assembly is broken or the definition of fenv_t.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
is broken or the definition of fenv_t.
drow is right, as usual. our fenv_t needs to be defined with
__attribute__((aligned(8))) or similar.
I'd recommend fixing the asm instead: that's an ABI change and would
require heinous rebuilds.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
they ought to be in /lib64.
I've verified that it won't complain about properly installed 64-bit
libraries on i386.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please tell me how to aquire them.
Can you still reproduce this? If so, it says that bash dumped core;
the core dump should be lying around somewhere. That might help.
I've tried to reproduce this but could not.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:57:36PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 07:21:32PM +0200, Attila Kinali wrote:
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x088e9208 ***
Can you still reproduce this? If so, it says that bash dumped core;
the core dump should
following the memory.
- These are double word stores, so you need sw[2].
Er... how can comment #1 possibly be correct? The documentation's
clear: fesetround should return 1 if it could not set the requested
rounding mode.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
stack alignment on hppa?)
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:17:21PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:54:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
drow is right, as usual. our fenv_t needs to be defined with
__attribute__((aligned(8))) or similar.
I'd recommend fixing the asm instead: that's an ABI
0x40841d9d in __dlopen (
file=0x8449990 /usr/lib/kde3/libamarok_gstengine_plugin.so, mode=257)
at dlopen.c:78
Suspicious; can you reproduce it? If so, can you describe how?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
, or at least an authoritative
statement and I'll sort the code out in the morning; I have the next
glibc upload otherwise ready.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the inline asm in glibc, then you don't
need to recompile any of the currently broken libraries or
applications.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:54:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 08:40:20AM +0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
I don't think that's what is happening at all: I think that in one of
these cases, your test file's on-stack fenv_t is aligned, and on the
other it isn't
the same.
-- CODE START --
#include asm/atomic.h
int main()
{
return 0;
}
-- CODE END --
Do not do that, then. This is one of many Linux headers which should
not be used from userspace programs.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
does the backtrace look like without libc6-dbg installed? What
does it look like with?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Therefore it is subject to ABI-incompatible
changes and sudden removal, which indeed has happened; it is no longer
available. Whatever you're using __libc_stack_end for, don't.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
support 2.2 very well. I don't know if anyone
will be able to figure out this problem. In the mean time, and since
there is no security support for 2.2 any more, I highly recommend an
upgrade.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
more NPTL in 2.3.5 or even the
current 2.3.2. Maybe I'm missing something.
No, it never did. Run /lib/tls/libc.so.6 instead.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of
pthread_join() which is where the code hangs. (I've been doing a
backtrace after manually killing the application)
Why do you think it's pthread_join's fault? pthread_join will wait for
a thread to complete. Is the thread being joined still running?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=fr_BE
LC_TELEPHONE=fr_BE
LC_MEASUREMENT=fr_BE
LC_IDENTIFICATION=fr_BE
LC_ALL=fr_BE
Note: this means that LC_ALL is already set in your environment.
LC_ALL is documented to override all the other environment variables.
So it's completely expected that changing LC_NUMERIC has no effect.
--
Daniel
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-5
Severity: normal
/etc/init.d/glibc.sh uses dpkg --compare-versions extensively.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% which dpkg
/usr/bin/dpkg
Init scripts, at least this early, can't use /usr. It isn't mounted yet!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
compatible with the sarge and etch 2.4
kernels. That seems sufficient to me; why not just mark glibc in the
preinst as being incompatible with old 2.4 kernels?
I'm fine with either of these solutions.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
with the new ld.so. Probably there is a stray copy
in /usr or some directory in /etc/ld.so.conf.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:48:36PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:09:38 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
08:47 waldi mprotect(0xb000, 4096,
PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC|PROT_GROWSDOWN) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid
argument)
08:47 waldi mprotect(0xbfff8000, 32768
the x86_64 headers
instead of the i386 ones.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the software doesn't help.
How did you get a libpthread.so.0 that does not match your ld.so?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in sid doesn't seem to provide NTPL yet on ppc.
That's correct. It's now fixable, but not yet fixed.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problems but at least we try to keep list of known problems. Look at
http://bugs.debian.org/hurd
That's not relevant. Has anyone reproduced this bug since then? If
not, Nathanael's right; it should be closed. The code has changed many
times since then.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
is returning EFAULT instead
for the same case.
This whole thing looks a bit fishy, since it could be making random
other bits writable... but that won't happen in recent kernels, anyway.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
this problem already identify the culprit (thus nss), and is
restaring services all ok?
In my opinion, yes, but I haven't tested it.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and whatever is
causing it to be tagged as needing one should be fixed. IIRC it is
usually a matter of annotating assembly files in some way.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-k-h already.
You're right that we should do the same for ia32/amd64 and ppc/ppc64 as
we do for sparc.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this bug against libc6 and not Apache).
I have installed the package libc6-i686 too, if this helps.
Are libc6-i686 and libc6 the same version? Have they been upgraded
since you last restarted apache?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/security/pam_krb5.so)
Aug 6 06:35:03 pylon CRON[305]: PAM [dlerror: /lib/libresolv.so.2: symbol
__res_maybe_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so
.6 with link time reference]
These errors indicate bugs in those libraries (pam_ldap, pam_krb5).
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
about this.
Please try the version currently in unstable, instead.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fixed, or go ahead and install the
newer glibc. my gut tells me i should stick to the former route, and
wait.
Try filing bugs on the affected modules?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
allow the compiler to check switch() statements if all possible input is
handled there.
Not generally relevant for unnamed enums.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to Debian and FOSS, but
it's hard to do so here unfortunatelly.
Yes. Right now, you're the only person who knows how the conversion to
2.3.5 is going; I don't want to get in the way. Afterwards, I hope
that the rest of us can be more helpful.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
binaries, too.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, describes minimum locales dependency
version. It's renamed from locales-shlibver because it's not shlib.
- debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk: Use LOCALES_DEP_VER to generate locales
dependency.
Maybe I'm missing something, but what loads debian/locales-depver?
--
Daniel
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 04:27:47PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
And I was wondering if anybody knows if this is fixed in
the experimental version too. I'll try and tests this
later.
Yes, this should be fixed in experimental.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
. Is there any way of
making this faster without buying faster hardware?
Not really. I do a lot of things by running make in object
directories, instead. I also work on multiple bugs at a time and build
them together.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
2.3.5 now, and working in unstable?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
they are so large.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 09:31:24PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:42:23PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:47:11AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22
Severity: serious
kbd-chooser fails to build
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 08:37:20AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
loadkeys.y should inline the macro definitions that it needs from
linux/keyboard.h instead of removing the include from
linux/keyboard.h? loadkeys.y appears to use the following macros:
Yes, in general this is correct.
--
Daniel
being included from? Is it necessary?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be transitional, anyway. In your opinion,
should we fix it, or should we remove it and make the affected library
packages build biarch on i386? I believe that's just glibc, ncurses, and
libbz2 (plus linux-kernel-headers). Ncurses and glibc already support
biarch builds.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
in
Debian locales?
Here is the glibc Bugzilla entry. The locale is attached there.
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=367
Thanks in advance.
Anuradha
--
http://www.linux.lk/~anuradha/
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
--
Daniel
.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
surprising - to me anyway. The
documentation presents it as an extension to LANG.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 10:43:41PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 04:56:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Except that the problem is that (if everything but LANGUAGE is unset)
I would have expected LANGUAGE to set LC_MESSAGES, and it doesn't.
This situation should
.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=en_US:de_DE:en_US cat -h
cat: Ungültige Option -- h
,,cat --help gibt weitere Informationen.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Option -- h
,,cat --help gibt weitere Informationen.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% LANG=en_US LANGUAGE=en_US:C:de_DE:en_US cat -h
cat: invalid option -- h
Try `cat --help' for more information.
Did that help?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
,
from /usr/include/linux/ext2_fs.h:20,
from test.c:1:
Don't do that then.
e2fsprogs supplies a version of this header which is suitable for
userspace. Use that instead.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:51:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:42:08AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:34:58AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
If you dare, could you try to reproduce the problem?
I can try that, as the system isn't too
is this? Am I reading you right to say that you
unpacked the same -22 debs and then things worked again?
If you dare, could you try to reproduce the problem?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:42:08AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:34:58AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:09:16AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole
glibc -21. The hppa
machines are configured with ulimit -s set to 1GB. This makes
LinuxThreads use 1GB thread stacks. Which is, um, pretty bad.
Anyone know why this was done?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:38:33PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:17:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
27319 mmap(NULL, 1073741824, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0 unfinished ...
27319 ... mmap resumed ) = -1 ENOMEM
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:17:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Hi debian-hppa (and -admin),
I tried building glibc manually on paer. It didn't work any better.
It turns out that ex1 hanging was not the first problem in the build;
make crashes building math/others. That's transient
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:45:35PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:21:48PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:38:33PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:17:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
27319 mmap(NULL
this problem building glibc a month
ago for -21.
If you want to change glibc at this point, discuss with Carlos; I can't
take care of it. Just getting -22 built has taken most of my free time
for this week.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
. Probably your mmap is busted.
I do not see anything that would cause this in -21 either.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:35:27PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
At the bottom of this message is a diff against glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21 which
fixes merged bugs 207872, 210840, 274852, and 276384. I spoke with Colin on
IRC and he seemed amenable to this as a last-minute fix for sarge. Does
reasonable solution: A patch by Daniel Jacobowitz from MontaVista
software. His explanations of what his patch does are detailed and
well-founded. So why is this patch not included in the debian glibc package
(speaking of both the source and binary one)? There are many people really
desparate
: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+# DP: Patch author: Daniel Jacobowitz, Roland McGrath, Jakub Jelinek
+# DP: Upstream status: In CVS
+# DP: Status Details: Backported
+# DP: Date: 2005-05-08
+
+PATCHLEVEL=1
+
+if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then
+echo 2 `basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch
GLIBC_2.3.3 symbol (it does have 2.3.2
and 2.3.4 and libc6 itself has them all).
This prevents running some binaries built on other distros like fedora
And what GLIBC_2.3.3 symbols does Fedora have?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
a
year now.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sure apt can cope.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
but I'd have to play around with it to make sure.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this special situation (ex:
distro compatibility and so on) because -21 should be the last call
for sarge stuff...
Could you explain what it is you're worried about? We absolutely
ought to have this patch...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
/ld.so.capabilities
- environment variable: LD_CAPABILITIES
No way. An additional data source with a grammar that needs to be
parsed at every application's startup?
What are you trying to accomplish with this proposal?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
101 - 200 of 972 matches
Mail list logo
