Bug#444597: mktime returns 0x7fffffff for the year 2057

2007-10-01 Thread Florian Weimer
reopen 444597 thanks * Tanaka Akira: Do you mean 0x7fff is -1 ? I don't think so. -1 is 0x, not 0x7fff. Oops, you a right. This is a real bug, then. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#444597: mktime returns 0x7fffffff for the year 2057

2007-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 444597 Bug#444597: mktime returns 0x7fff for the year 2057 Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#444866: tzdata: Please provide tzdata-source package with original Olsen database

2007-10-01 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
Package: tzdata Version: 2007g-2 Severity: wishlist Please provide the tzdata-source binary package with original Olsen database. My package libdatetime-timezone-perl (possibly others, like libicu) could use it as build-dep. It would make the synchronizing the timezone data much simplier for

Re: getaddrinfo() behaviour

2007-10-01 Thread Ian Jackson
Anthony Towns writes (Re: getaddrinfo() behaviour): In my opinion, if this isn't an RC issue, there's no urgency to having glibc changed prior to the standards changing, and as such, this isn't the last resort so the tech ctte shouldn't be deciding the issue, let alone overruling the

Re: getaddrinfo() behaviour

2007-10-01 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes (Re: getaddrinfo() behaviour): Limiting the TC's power to overrule a technical decision to only cases where the TC believes that the wrong behaviour makes the package unsuitable for release would eviscerate the only mechanism we have for dealing with errors by maintainers.

Re: getaddrinfo() behaviour

2007-10-01 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 04:30:17PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: Ian Jackson writes (Re: getaddrinfo() behaviour): Limiting the TC's power to overrule a technical decision to only cases where the TC believes that the wrong behaviour makes the package unsuitable for release would eviscerate the

[Bug libc/4655] copy directives misparse

2007-10-01 Thread drepper at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2007-10-02 04:29 --- The am_ET locale is wrong. The new script must be defined after the copy. This now works fine. -- What|Removed |Added