Hi Joss,
Josselin Mouette wrote:
1. GNOME-PYTHON
I propose to file wishlist bugs on the packages that can move to using
python-gconf.
2. GNOME-PYTHON-DESKTOP
I propose to file important bugs on all packages depending on
python-gnome2-desktop, making them RC once the package is removed
Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer escribió:
Hi,
Attached a small patch for the package of the latest upstream release of
glabels (2.2.5).
Hi Rodolphe,
The patch is not against our svn, it seems you diffed against your previous
changes or something like that.
Cheers,
Emilio
signature.asc
Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer escribió:
Oops, i've tried to check everything but i forget the patch itself :)
This patch should be better.
Seems better, yeah :)
Just one comment: you should comment all your changes in debian/changelog, e.g.
- New upstream version.
+ Fixes foo. Closes: #123.
+
Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer escribió:
Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 00:10 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
Can you update the patch?
Yep, voila!
I've seen that lintian raise new warnings but I didn't take time to fix
them (actually, I need to read about and make tests).
Thanks, applied
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
Was just trying to install an old gnome-cups-manager, but it not only
needs a rebuild (and forward-port to g++ 4.3+), but also *conflicts*
with the lenny gnome meta-package!
What new package provides similar functionality? Are there any plans
for
Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
Le samedi 20 juin 2009 à 22:31 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer escribió:
Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 00:10 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
Can you update the patch?
Yep, voila!
I've seen that lintian raise new warnings but I
Hi Julien,
Julien Cristau wrote:
I've sent the attached mail to debian-qa, and would be interested to
have the opinion of maintainers of other big (sets of) packages.
[ mail about focused BSPs ]
I think that's a great idea! If they were done I'd try to participate, and if
done in GNOME
Daniel Schepler wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009 04:08:01 Josselin Mouette wrote:
As for Tracker, you’d have to explain how this indirect dependency
happens.
Through nautilus (for libnautilus-extension-dev), which Build-Depends on
libtrackerclient-dev.
Good catch, I've reported it at
Heya,
Josselin Mouette wrote:
some time ago, someone (was it HE?) proposed to reserve a week-end
during we would try to close, forward and fix as many as possible of the
bugs reported on the team-maintained packages.
Julien Cristau proposed to organize focused BSPs on November.
It didn’t
Hi,
On 03/03/10 23:18, Luis Felipe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to know how to add a new SW package to the Debian distribution.
This package is named Usbview2 and is hosted under SourceForge.net
(see [1]). I have developed this application and I would like to share over
Debian too. Can you
On 04/03/10 21:17, Luis Felipe wrote:
thanks for the quick answer! I have decided to sent an ITP for being the
package maintainer too.
Good. You can mail debian-mentors@ when you need sponsorship, or if you have
questions.
Cheers,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 18/05/10 21:32, Ali wrote:
Hi Debian gnome developers,
do you have any plans for bluefish 2.0?
We don't maintain it. But see this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570731
Cheers,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi,
On 04/08/10 10:24, Josselin Mouette wrote:
as some of you might have heard, there is going to be a GNOME 2.32
release in September, GNOME 3.0 being delayed to next spring.
For a large number of modules, 2.32 is going to be a pure bugfix release
based on 2.30. Therefore I propose the
On 04/08/10 18:14, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 04 août 2010 à 17:21 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
I'd say it depends on when the RT plans to freeze the archive. If soon (e.g.
this month) maybe we should just release with 2.30? But if they don't plan to
release anytime soon
On 09/08/10 17:04, Roman V. Nikolaev wrote:
We have trend to order applet names. For example:
xul-ext-...
opensync-plugin-...
cairo-dock-...
etc.
Have a plan to make order for gnome panel names?
Not at the moment. You can name it however you want.
Regards,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 14/02/11 17:36, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Also, for link-monitor-applet, I need to find out whether gob2 needs to
be updated. But it seems that GTK-3 still uses GLib-2, so this might
work.
There's no GLib 3.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On 14/02/11 20:46, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 06:17:36PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
The panel remains, but it will be a GTK3 / D-Bus panel. In its current
state, it doesn’t support the good old GTK2 / bonobo applets, of which
we have a lot in the archive. Upstream
On 15/02/11 09:15, Michael Biebl wrote:
That said, the upstream unstable branch of tracker apparently has a port of
tracker-search-bar using libpanelapplet-3.0, which I assume is the new D-Bus
based panel in GNOME 3.0.
I can't seem to find such a package in Debian just yet.
Joss, when do
On 08/03/11 01:52, Miles Bader wrote:
hob...@poukram.net (Rémi Letot) writes:
They didn't go insane, thanks.
Thats a matter of opinion.
They just changed the default way to do it, and they didn't remove the
possibility to revert the change. And having used it for a few days, I
must say
On 15/04/11 11:17, Josselin Mouette wrote:
1. libnotify
This has been requested and is tracked as #622363. As mentioned in the
bugreport, we will try to get Xfce before (asked earlier and seems to
simplify the transition a bit).
Yes, although libnotify 0.6 doesn’t require anything and would
On 03/03/13 09:18, Arief M Utama wrote:
Just realized yesterday that my nice, stylish screen-lock (gdm-shell
enabled) is not working anymore.
Tried some things, and downgraded libc6 and dbus back to unstable version
also... still not working.
It could be the new gsettings-desktop-schemas
On 03/03/13 16:08, Arief M Utama wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.orgwrote:
It could be the new gsettings-desktop-schemas 3.7.90, do you have that
installed?
Yes!
Does downgrading it to 3.6 fix the problem?
and... yes!
Thanks a bunch Emilio
Hi all,
gdm3 3.4.1-7 from unstable fixes an important accessibility issue (the screen
reader no longer working on gdm).
To make sure the packages are fine, I'd appreciate if people could test it
(you'll also need gnome-session 3.4.2.1-4). After installing those, make sure
gdm still works as
On 17/05/13 08:13, Johannes Rohr wrote:
Dear maintainers,
sorry for my impatience! I noticed that GNOME 3.8 is still in experimental, even
though the Wheezy release process is over. Are there any indications as to when
it is going to make it into unstable? Is it waiting for some transition to
On 04/06/13 11:29, Johannes Rohr wrote:
while I do use adblock plus with Iceweasel, it seems a bit arbitrary to me
that
the gnome meta package declares a dependency on it. Adblock plus is not part
of
the GNOME desktop. In addition, it pulls in iceweasel which also isn't. What
is
the
On 18/06/13 11:55, Johannes Rohr wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 18.06.2013, 11:08 +0200 schrieb Jordi Mallach:
El dt 18 de 06 de 2013 a les 08:50 +0200, en/na Johannes Rohr va
escriure:
Now, maybe there is a good reason to include this package into the GNOME
desktop metapackage, but if there is
On 11/09/13 11:31, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
Le 08/09/2013 10:47, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
Or is there any principal reason not to update the remaining portions of
the GNOME desktop in Debian?
I tried ; this is currently very difficult, because systemd is quite
intricated with
On 11/09/13 12:41, Johannes Rohr wrote:
And I really don't get what is still holding up GNOME 3.8.
Right now it's the evolution-data-server transition, which is being worked on.
After that happens, it'll probably be time to get mutter, gnome-shell, g-s-d,
g-c-c and so into unstable, bringing the
On 01/02/14 18:01, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know if someone is working on this.
If not, can I work on this when I ready for it.
I just begin my training for maintainerschip.
We don't know, this list is not related to cinnamon. Ask its maintainers.
Emilio
--
To
On 20/03/14 08:16, Johannes Rohr wrote:
Am 24.01.2014 09:27, schrieb Jordi Mallach:
El dj 23 de 01 de 2014 a les 13:44 +0100, en/na Johannes Rohr va
I'd really love to test out GNOME 3.10, but in the current incomplete
state it seems to make limited sense.
Just curious to know...
I suspect
On 04/04/14 14:16, Johannes Rohr wrote:
One question: On
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+WorldofgnomeOrg/posts/WunFLk5ES6W
I read in a comment:
The new decision is: all Gnome versions released close to Debian freeze will
come to Debian sid and testing, the other versions stay on experimental
On 20/05/14 01:38, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Hi Philip,
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Philip Rinn ri...@inventati.org wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gtkspellmm. This package is a
dependency of
On 22/05/14 11:00, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Hi,
since a couple of weeks, I have two audio devices to choose for audio
output. One is Speakers and the other is Analog Output (translated
from German). The problem is, that I have to switch very often between
the two of them, depending if I have
On 11/06/14 11:45, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 Emilio wrote:
we should have all of 3.12 in testing/unstable this month.
Which month ?
$cur_month :)
More seriously, we are blocked on a upower transition.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 04/08/14 15:20, Alberto Garcia wrote:
WebKitGTK+ 2.5.1 has just been published. This is the first
development release of the upcoming 2.6 series.
WebKitGTK+ has two APIs: the classic one and the more recent
WebKit2. The classic one is now often referred to as WebKit1.
WebKit1 supports
On 06/08/14 13:25, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:14:13AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
An ITP is not needed. After all, this is just a new release of an
existing package, with a different src name for technical reasons.
Ok
Opinions? Comments?
Sounds good! Let
On 08/08/14 00:29, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014, Jordi Mallach wrote:
Well, it's roughly that time. :) So I'd like to plainly request GNOME
is reinstated as the default desktop environment for a number of
reasons.
One of the reasons put forward for switching to Xfce was size on
On 22/10/14 20:27, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnome-initial-setup
Version : 3.14.1
Upstream Author :
* URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/OS/InitialSetup
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description
On 09/11/14 17:03, Felix Natter wrote:
Dear gtk-gnome-maintainers,
there is a bug in GTK(?) applications (nautilus, pavucontrol, probably
more) where (svg?) icons are way too large in current jessie:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765069
On 30/08/15 18:19, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As discussed at DebConf [1,2,3], we would like to make the accessibility
> stack enabled by default, so that all a user who needs it has to do is
> just to start orca (while at the moment she has to find an option in
> the control panel, and
On 20/05/16 18:53, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ATM there are some applications depending explicitly against gnome-icon-theme
> or
> gnome-icon-theme-symbolic packages.
>
> I think that these could be dropped from the default installation (I'm pretty
> sure that the cd team will be
On 30/01/17 13:18, Kevin Connor Arpe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am an unstable/sid user on a vanilla x86-64 PC.
>
> I am trying to debug some app code that uses libgtk+ 3. I would be
> very helpful to also have debug symbols for this library.
>
> My libgtk-3-0 is currently 3.22.7-2. Using
On 30/01/17 16:19, Kevin Connor Arpe wrote:
> Emilio,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> I tried to follow instructions from this page:
> https://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace
> ... to rebuild package libgtk-3-0, but failed with error.
>
> root> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nostrip noopt" fakeroot
On 04/11/17 16:19, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Nov 2017 at 16:09:28 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 02.11.2017 um 16:33 schrieb Simon McVittie:
>>> I'm tempted to modify the Lintian check to do this:
>>>
>>> * If gir1.2-foo-1.0 contains Bar-2.0.typelib and has
>>> Provides:
On 10/12/17 01:57, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], all Alioth emails will stop accepting
> new mail February 1, less than 8 weeks from now.
I thought there were plans to keep the lists working. Am I maybe misremembering?
Cheers,
Emilio
On 16/10/2018 22:05, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 16.10.18 um 22:01 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 16.10.18 um 21:53 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
>>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 2:37 PM Jérémy Lal wrote:
libepoxy is needed by both KDE and GNOME packages.
What's the best team to maintain it ?
>>>
>>> I
Hi Cyril,
On 17/12/2018 15:56, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 17:00:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 13/12/2018 16:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> task-pkgs-are-installable-faux depends on task-gnome-desktop, which depends
>>> on
On 16/01/2019 17:20, Iain Lane wrote:
> I asked on IRC, but this might be more durable for those who weren't
> watching at the time.
>
> I'd like to upload 3.32 to experimental. Would this be a problem, given
> the freeze and that it wouldn't be going into buster? I'm not going to
> be touching
On 08/03/2019 10:07, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 923694
>
> On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 at 22:21:31 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify
> meta-gnome3
r with
> gjs 1.52.x (which has a backport of those changes done by a developer who does
> not have in-depth knowledge of gjs, namely me); so I would like to ask for a
> freeze exception to complete this transition.
Yes, it is my intention to finish this.
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at
On 08/02/2019 17:21, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 at 16:48:52 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> I'm not sure how to hide a particular entry on a particular arch; I'm
>> not a tasksel expert and won't be one in the next 5 minutes. But it
>> seems to me the immediate concern was about
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 08/04/2020 14:22, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2020-04-08 11:46:59 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On 21/03/2020 13:17, Simon McVittie wrote:
It would probably make most sense to treat gnome-desktop3 and mutter as
a single transition, as we have often
On 15/04/2020 09:53, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 13:42:46 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gnome-desktop3.html
>> - Should be ready to start binNMUs
>> - Please binNMU xdg-desktop-portal-gtk in
On 16/04/2020 10:08, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 12:27:04 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Let's go ahead.
>
> gnome-desktop3 has migrated, but gnome-shell and mutter have not. We're
> now getting reports that GNOME Shell in testing is crashing becau
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Simon,
On 25/09/2020 00:09, Simon McVittie wrote:
> budgie-desktop should be the only non-GNOME-team package directly affected
> by this, apart from gnome-shell-xrdesktop which is not in testing anyway
> (and needs to move to contrib). budgie needs at least a
55 matches
Mail list logo
