On Fri, 2022-05-06 at 12:04 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
>
> > > Note that the DHG doesn't use gbp for packaging - it only
> > > maintains
> > > the
> > > debian directory in a single git repository for all packages, so
> > > there
> > > would be a few
On Fri, 6 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
Note that the DHG doesn't use gbp for packaging - it only maintains
the
debian directory in a single git repository for all packages, so
there
would be a few changes required to your packaging (e.g. switch the
VCS to
the DHG repo, change the Maintainer
Hi Scott,
On Fri, 2022-05-06 at 09:27 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> If you would like to maintain it as part of the DHG, you can either
> apply
> to join the DHG group on Salsa, or possibly simpler, you could just
> create
> a pull request adding the packaging to the DHG packages repo[1].
I
Quoting Scott Talbert (2022-05-06 15:27:09)
> Note that the DHG doesn't use gbp for packaging - it only maintains
> the debian directory in a single git repository for all packages, so
> there would be a few changes required to your packaging (e.g. switch
> the VCS to the DHG repo, change the
On Fri, 6 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 17:47 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
Do you intend to maintain it as part of the Debian Haskell Group?
Yes. I would like to, if that is okay?
I think it makes sense to do that.
As Bastian pointed out in your RFS
On Fri, 2022-05-06 at 08:07 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> > As Bastian pointed out in your RFS bug, the Vcs fields should point
> > to the
> > Vcs where you intend to maintain the packaging, not the upstream
> > Vcs.
>
> I did ask Bastian as well (on the bug), but as I don't have access to
>
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 17:47 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
>
> Do you intend to maintain it as part of the Debian Haskell Group?
Yes. I would like to, if that is okay?
> As Bastian pointed out in your RFS bug, the Vcs fields should point
> to the
> Vcs where you intend to maintain the
