Just an observation: adding the -O0 option here will create an unoptimized
build, which will run more slowly. So this is definitely not a patch that
should remain more than short-term.
I have no idea what this issue is, by the way. We regularly test pandoc
upstream against ghc versions
Quoting Sven Bartscher (2022-11-25 13:02:44)
> TL;DR if you think changing the maintainer addresses of your packages
> helps you deal with them, go for it, but try not to take it as a reason
> to reduce the ongoing collaboration with the rest of the team.
I am not planning on _reducing_ my
Hi Jonas,
Heads up: I've not been very active in the team for a long time, so my
views might only have historical relevance.
Just as a general rule of thumb, traditionally we tried to keep
discussion emails on debian-haskell@lists.debian.org and packaging noise
on
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2022-11-24 09:27:39)
> I just noticed:
> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=debian-haskell%40lists.debian.org
> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=pkg-haskell-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> It seems Jonas is using a different maintainer address for
