On 12861 March 1977, Steve McIntyre wrote:
There's a related question, which I just realised wasn't actually
explicit - does it make sense to add an architecture to testing at this
stage of the process which we don't think is releasable? My memory of
previous discussions is that the general
Hi
From our FTPMaster meeting 2011 minutes[1]:
--8schnipp-8---
- In a discussion with the Debian Hurd porters it was decided that the
Hurd port stays on FTPMaster until Wheezy is released. Should they
have managed to get the port into a state
with all the others (probably as a technology preview)...
So, release people: How likely is it that Hurd gets added to jessie?
If added as a 'technology preview', what does that mean exactly?
Note that the tech preview was a softening of a requirement to get added
to wheezy. Which didnt
Hi,
with the Lenny release upcoming we are thinking about larger changes to
the Debian archive, of which one point is Clean up the supported
architecture list to free up space for new ones.
We had a few discussions during DebConf8 and came up with the following
rules:
- If an architecture
Hi,
As the jessie release approaches, the ftp-team have been reviewing the
status of the architectures in unstable.
Neither sparc nor hurd-i386 are going to release with jessie and we are
therefore looking at their future in unstable.
SPARC
=
On 13931 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
That pad says: As a result of current state, d-ports cannot accept more
ports. If that's still true, it would make sense to postpone dropping
hurd and sparc until this is fixed...
Hurd is already on d-p, so hurd actually has double infrastructure
On 15371 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the
time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks.
The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
deb, udeb and buildinfo files from the archives (main and
Hi
back in August 2018 we discussed architecture inclusion into
unstable/experimental.
Today we had our regular FTPMaster meeting and discussed hurd and both
kfreebsd architecture and decided to remove them from unstable and
experimental 2 weeks from now.
--
bye, Joerg
The sun? That’s the
On 15381 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> It would be nice to have a bit more than 2 weeks to do all of that.
Ok. How much? Is 6 or 8 weeks better? I don't think, given how long this
is on the table already, it doesn't make much difference if its 2 or 8.
Just something thats clear defined
9 matches
Mail list logo
