Re: ca-certificate-java/openjdk installation issues

2023-02-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: >Notice that ca-certificates-java attempts to process triggers before >default-jre is set up. This is exactly the condition we are trying to >avoid. It should run them again, and there’s got to be a way, but I’m not a triggers expert and currently ill,

Re: ca-certificate-java/openjdk installation issues

2023-02-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: >This is possible to do if we update openjdk packaging and make it >trigger certificates-ca-java, so that it always runs after the openjdk We can do that easily. I maintain 8 and doko the rest (I hope). If that’s needed, i.e. if there’s no other way,

Re: ca-certificate-java/openjdk installation issues

2023-02-23 Thread Vladimir Petko
Hi, This is possible to do if we update openjdk packaging and make it trigger certificates-ca-java, so that it always runs after the openjdk package is installed and remove postinstall update from ca-certificates-java altogether. This will work, but we might get several trigger calls in a row if

Re: ca-certificate-java/openjdk installation issues

2023-02-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: >The issue is the migration procedure - those packages have to be >published together to avoid any nasty surprises. Yeah, we’ll have to pick a time to do that, which is after the bookworm release anyway (it’s not okay to upload things to unstable right

Re: ca-certificate-java/openjdk installation issues

2023-02-23 Thread Vladimir Petko
Hi, Thank you very much for the advice I have tested this approach [1] and it looks good - the trigger is called after update-alternatives in the postinstall script of the jre-headless and this guarantees that we have a working java when we try to import certificates. Libreoffice has no

RE: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian

2023-02-23 Thread sun min
Hi Olek, > I added that in an attempt to override the incorrect flag, but instead > they are both emitted which still causes the error. Sorry for the misleading. I forgot that the "flaky Java autopkgtests" has been disabled. :-) Yes, It failed once I tried to enable the "java-1-hello" test.

RE: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian

2023-02-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023, sun min wrote: >It seems that the build system's local jdk overrides those jvm >parameters we defined in bazelrc or bashsrcript. How about asking Doko to locally add that parameter to 17 as a Debian-specific patch, just ignoring it? (And, ideally, warning.) bye,

Re: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian

2023-02-23 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 2023-02-23 12:48, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : How about asking Doko to locally add that parameter to 17 as a Debian-specific patch, just ignoring it? Patching the JDK is overkill, it's just a flag to change in a script. The question is, where is this script? Emmanuel Bourg