Re: Request to join Java team

Hi Matthew, Am Freitag, dem 29.03.2024 um 08:45 + schrieb 'Matthew Fennell: > [...] > * Please may I get approved to join the java team on Salsa? My username is >   matthew-fennell. I have just added you to the Java team on Salsa > * Please may someone also use the script to create "precis"

Re: ditaa on Salsa

Am Freitag, dem 08.12.2023 um 16:34 +0100 schrieb Alexandre Detiste: > Hi, > > I found ditaa on Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/ditaa > > I'd like to do one QA upload > to fix #953572 & more misc tiny stuff > and push changes there. > > Can I get access to this one repo ? Done.

Re: Bug#1034059: marked as pending in zstd-jni-java

Hi tony, Am Sonntag, dem 09.04.2023 um 11:19 -0700 schrieb tony mancill: > > I wanted to ask you your thoughts on whether the fix should also include > updating debian/control to strictly depend on the version(s) specified > in the patched pom.  Without some explicit declaration of dependencies,

Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm?

Am Mittwoch, dem 01.02.2023 um 12:24 +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 2023-01-26 17:17, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > > > I've been working on Kotlin lately, trying to make it build with > > OpenJDK 17 > > only, and hopefully have it included in Bookworm. > > > > Long story short, after days

Re: Kotlin and OpenJDK 8 in Bookworm?

Hi Emmanuel, Am Donnerstag, dem 26.01.2023 um 17:17 +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Hi all, > > I've been working on Kotlin lately, trying to make it build with OpenJDK > 17 > only, and hopefully have it included in Bookworm. > > Long story short, after days banging my head on this issue, I

Tomcat 10

Hi all, I would like to upload tomcat10 to unstable and discontinue tomcat9 for the upcoming next stable release. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tomcat10 I don't intend to introduce any of the changes we have previously discussed on this list for now and just move on with the usual

Re: Tomcat 10 packaging

Hi, Am Mittwoch, dem 28.09.2022 um 17:53 +0200 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Hi all, > > For Debian Bookworm I'd like to replace Tomcat 9 with Tomcat 10. But > this time instead of introducing a "tomcat10" package, I wonder if we > could instead create a version-less "tomcat" package and keep it

Re: tomcat10 in debian experimental

Hi, Am Samstag, dem 24.09.2022 um 22:17 +0200 schrieb Alberto Senni: >  Hi to all >   >  when the tomcat 10 package will be available in debian stable We intend to ship with Tomcat 10 in Debian 12 "Bookworm" but the next stable release is scheduled for 2023, so you have to be patient. Regards,

Bug#1018100: ITP: liblanguage-detector-java -- Language Detection Library for Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org,debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: liblanguage-detector-java Version : 0.6 Upstream Author : Nakatani Shuyo, Francois ROLAND, Fabian Kessler

Re: Gradle packaging status update

Am Samstag, dem 20.08.2022 um 18:27 +0200 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > On Sat, 20 Aug 2022, Phil Morrell wrote: > > > Hi all, documenting my observations as of today because it's not looking > > promising for bookworm. > > > > * kotlin FTBFS because of changes to support openjdk 17 #1012214 > >

Bug#1017644: ITP: libtitanium-json-ld-java -- implementation of the JSON-LD 1.1 specification in Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org,debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libtitanium-json-ld-java Version : 1.3.1 Upstream Author : Filip Kolarik and the original authors and contributors

Bug#1017642: ITP: libjsonp2-java -- Jakarta JSON Processing

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org,debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libjsonp2-java Version : 2.1.1 Upstream Author : Oracle and/or its affiliates * URL : https://github.com

Re: Help with Bundletool update

Am Mittwoch, dem 20.07.2022 um 20:03 +0100 schrieb Nkwuda Sunday Cletus: > com.android.aapt.Resources aapt is a binary package compiled from https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/android-platform-frameworks-base I'm not sure if that will solve your problem. You can search for imports or code in

Re: Help With Gradle-plugin-protobuf Update

Hi Sonnie, Am Freitag, dem 08.07.2022 um 20:35 +0100 schrieb Nkwuda Sunday Cletus: > Hi there. > > I am a GSOC intern currently working with Debian Android-tools-team to > package and update Android sdk tools in Debian. > > Currently I am attempting to package bundletool ( >

Re: Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

Am Montag, dem 28.03.2022 um 21:06 -0700 schrieb tony mancill: > [...] > I am interested to hear other opinions from the Debian Java Team. I have no objections with implementing this change and I agree that a versionless symlink is preferable for consistency reasons. The current behavior doesn't

OpenRefine

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that OpenRefine has entered testing a few days ago. OpenRefine is a web application but it runs on your own computer to ensure privacy when working with data. I have also backported all dependencies to bullseye-backports and currently openrefine itself is the

Re: update of logback to 1.28

Hi tony, Am Mittwoch, dem 15.12.2021 um 12:20 -0800 schrieb tony mancill: > Hello Java Team, > > I have prepared an update of logback to 1.2.8, which addresses the same > type of JNDI vulnerability recently announced for log4j2. > > Additional details in https://jira.qos.ch/browse/LOGBACK-1591 

Re: joining Debian Java Team

Am Dienstag, dem 07.12.2021 um 20:28 -0500 schrieb Joe Nahmias: > [...] > Yes, I am a DD and have requested team membership on salsa since quite some > time ago. Access granted. Welcome on board! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: joining Debian Java Team

Hello Joe, Am Dienstag, dem 07.12.2021 um 10:51 -0500 schrieb Joe Nahmias: > Hello, > > I'd like to pacakge a number of Java libs/apps under the framework of the > Debian Java team. How do I join? > > Thanks, > --Joe Are you a DM or DD? Then you can request team membership on salsa.debian.org

Re: libspring-java support

Hi Sylvain, Am Freitag, dem 03.12.2021 um 14:28 +0100 schrieb Sylvain Beucler: > Hi, > > This year I worked on libspring-java twice for LTS In both case > upstream provided limited information for the CVEs, and for 5 of them > we're unable to determine the fixes. >

Re: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

Hello, Am Freitag, dem 15.10.2021 um 12:41 +0300 schrieb Andrius Merkys: > Hello, > > Java policy on Java libraries (Ch. 2.4.) reads [1]: > >     Their classes must be in jar archive(s) in the directory /usr/ >     share/java, with the name packagename[-extraname] >     -fullversion.jar. The

Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security

Hi backports team, please remove tomcat9 from buster-backports because Emmanuel won't have the time to update the package for the next months and I don't intend to maintain it. My recommendation for all users of tomcat9 is to use the version in buster because it receives full security support.

Bug#996255: ITP: libowasp-encoder-java -- OWASP Java Encoder Project

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libowasp-encoder-java Version : 1.2.3 Upstream Author : OWASP (Open Web-Application Security Project) * URL

Bug#996182: ITP: google-api-services-sheets-java -- Google Sheets API Client Library for Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: google-api-services-sheets-java Version : 1.32.1-1 Upstream Author : Google * URL : https://github.com

Bug#996180: ITP: google-api-services-drive-java -- Google Drive API Client Library for Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: google-api-services-drive-java Version : 1.32.1-1 Upstream Author : Google Inc. * URL : https

Bug#996179: ITP: libokhttp-signpost-java -- Signpost extension for signing OkHttp requests

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libokhttp-signpost-java Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Patrik Åkerfeldt * URL : http://github.com

Bug#996178: ITP: libwikidata-toolkit-java -- Wikidata Toolkit

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libwikidata-toolkit-java Version : 0.12.1 Upstream Author : Markus Kroetzsch, Julian Mendez, Fredo Erxleben

Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security

Am Dienstag, dem 10.08.2021 um 22:47 +0200 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > Currently I don't plan to update the bpo version of Tomcat 9 in Buster. If > > you > > prefer the latest updates then I'd suggest to focus on bullseye-b

Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security

Hi, Am Dienstag, dem 10.08.2021 um 22:00 +0200 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: [...] > Markus, Emmanuel, are you going to update the backport to the > latest version (9.0.43-3 or 9.0.43-3~deb11u1 once migrated) > fixing the compile time problem (some constants for Java™ 15 > and newer are not defined

Re: New source package httpcomponents-client5

Hi Olek, Am Montag, den 19.04.2021, 12:23 -0400 schrieb Olek Wojnar: [...] > I packaged RxJava a while back [3] because newer versions of Bazel need it. > Please let me know if anything you need is missing in the packaging. > It seems httpcomponents-{core5,client5} requires

Re: New source package httpcomponents-client5

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 15.04.2021, 07:16 -0700 schrieb tony mancill: [...] > Hi Markus, > > No objections from me. It's nice the artifactId is httpclient5, so we > can name the JAR the same and the package should co-installable with the > the 4.x series. (I only checked the main JAR, hopefully

Bug#987099: ITP: openrefine-opencsv -- CSV parser library for Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: openrefine-opencsv Version : 2.4 Upstream Author : Bytecode Pty Ltd, Kyle Miller * URL : https

Bug#987098: ITP: httpcomponents-client5 -- HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 compliant HTTP agent implementation

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: httpcomponents-client5 Version : 5.0.3 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation * URL : https

Bug#987097: ITP: httpcomponents-core5 -- set of low level HTTP transport components for Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: httpcomponents-core5 Version : 5.0.3 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation * URL : https

New source package httpcomponents-client5

Hi, I intend to package the 5.x series of httpcomponents-client [1][2][3]. We already have the 4.x series in Debian packaged as src:httpcomponents-client. Is there anything against packaging the 5.x series as src:httpcomponents-client5? [1]

Bug#986926: ITP: libsweble-common-java -- common classes for sweble projects

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: libsweble-common-java Version : 3.0.8 Upstream Author : The Open Source Research Group

Bug#986924: ITP: libsweble-wikitext-java -- parser for MediaWiki's wikitext

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: libsweble-wikitext-java Version : 3.1.9 Upstream Author : The Open Source Research Group

Bug#986922: ITP: libxtc-rats-java -- parser generator written in Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: libxtc-rats-java Version : 1.15.0 Upstream Author : Robert Grimm, New York University, Princeton University

Bug#986921: ITP: maven-jflex-plugin -- Maven plugin to generate Lexer code in Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: maven-jflex-plugin Version : 1.7.0 Upstream Author : Gerwin Klein, Steve Rowe, Régis Décamps * URL

Bug#986857: ITP: librdfa-java -- SAX-based Java RDFa parser

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany * Package name: librdfa-java Version : 1.0.0~BETA1 Upstream Author : The University of Bristol * URL : https://github.com/iteggmbh/java-rdfa * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Java Description

Bug#986681: ITP: libodfdom-java -- OpenDocument Format (ODF) framework

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: libodfdom-java Version : 0.9.0~RC2 Upstream Author : The Document Foundation * URL : https

Bug#986680: ITP: libsecondstring-java -- approximate string-matching routines

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: libsecondstring-java Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : 2003 Carnegie Mellon University * URL : https

Bug#986679: ITP: openrefine-vicino -- near-neighbor search tool for Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: openrefine-vicino Version : 1.2 Upstream Author : 2006-2010 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Contributors

Bug#986678: ITP: openrefine-arithcode -- Java implementation of arithmetic coding and PPM compression

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: openrefine-arithcode Version : 1.2 Upstream Author : Bob Carpenter * URL : https://github.com/bob

Bug#986677: ITP: libmarc4j-java -- API for working with MARC and MARCXML in Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: libmarc4j-java Version : 2.9.1 Upstream Author : Robert Haschart, Bas Peters, Bill Dueber, et.al. * URL

Bug#986611: ITP: openrefine-butterfly -- modular web application framework

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: openrefine-butterfly Version : 1.1.1 Upstream Author : Stefano Mazzocchi * URL : https://github.com

Bug#986609: ITP: libdexx-java -- immutable, persistent collection classes for Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: libdexx-java Version : 0.7 Upstream Author : Andrew O'Malley * URL : https://github.com/andrewoma/dexx

Bug#986608: ITP: liblessen-java -- lightweight CSS+LESS parser written in Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: liblessen-java Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : David Huynh * URL : https://search.maven.org/artifact

Bug#986604: ITP: openrefine -- powerful tool for working with messy data

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: openrefine Version : 3.5 Upstream Author : OpenRefine contributors * URL : https://openrefine.org

Bug#986435: ITP: libthrift-java -- Java language support for Thrift

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, 938...@bugs.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org * Package name: libthrift-java Version : 0.13.0 Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation * URL

Packaging OpenRefine

Hi folks, some of you may remember the discussion about packaging OpenRefine [1] for Debian in December 2020. [2] Good news, we came to an agreement to package OpenRefine and to support its maintenance for the foreseeable future. I intend to introduce the core components in the upcoming weeks,

Re: Packaging Gradle

Hello, Am Samstag, den 13.03.2021, 02:29 +0530 schrieb Raman Sarda: > Dear all, > I have a few queries. > Is there a way we can go about updating gradle using some another way? I have > worked on major part of the update last summer but seems we can't go any > further without gradle enterprise

Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help?

Am Mittwoch, den 23.12.2020, 23:54 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > jruby > -> libspring-java > -> guice > -> gradle > -> maven > We should try to break this dependency-chain. gradle and maven in Debian don't really need jruby. Markus signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help?

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 23.12.2020, 16:15 -0500 schrieb Louis-Philippe Véronneau: > Hello! > > While working on a Clojure package that depends on jruby, I noticed it's > in pretty bad shape: > > 1. it FTBFS (#959600) > > 2. it has a bunch of CVEs (#972230) > > 3. it doesn't run without declaring

Re: List of consultants focusing on Debian packaging for Java?

Am Montag, den 07.12.2020, 15:33 +0100 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > Ideally the Butterfly source code is included in src:openrefine and Maven > > would > > do the rest. > > Does maven-debian-helper handle mul

Re: List of consultants focusing on Debian packaging for Java?

Am Sonntag, den 06.12.2020, 21:46 +0100 schrieb Antonin Delpeuch (lists): [...] > How important is it that all dependencies are packaged independently? > Butterfly is a framework that has not been maintained for years, and we > are not aware of any other users beyond OpenRefine. We would love to >

Build failures on arm64 are release critical now

Control: severity -1 normal Hello, The package builds fine on amd64. I don't think it is correct to use severity serious in this case because ufoai-maps is an arch:all package. The same is true for Java packages. If we want to make this a release goal (making arch all packages buildable on all

Re: List of consultants focusing on Debian packaging for Java?

Hi Antonin, Am Freitag, den 04.12.2020, 21:46 +0100 schrieb Antonin Delpeuch (lists): [...] > It is not clear to me to what extent a Debian packaging project lends > itself to fixed-term contracting, since maintaining the package will > require continued work as we release new versions. Perhaps

Re: List of consultants focusing on Debian packaging for Java?

Hello Antonin, Am Freitag, den 04.12.2020, 17:54 +0100 schrieb Antonin Delpeuch (lists): > Hello, > > I am looking for a consultant to help package Java software for Debian. > I wonder if you maintain a directory of developers who would be able to > work on this as contractors? > > I have found

Re: Request for team membership [was Please accept merge request for building gkl for non-amd64]

Am Mittwoch, den 18.11.2020, 09:28 +0100 schrieb Michael R. Crusoe: > Thanks for the merge! > > Consider this my request for membership in the Debian Java Team so I don't > have to bother others in the future :-) I have added you to the Java team on salsa. Cheers, Markus signature.asc

Re: Bug#973135: Bug#973070: libsis-base-java: FTBFS: Could not delete the directory targets/unit-test-wd/ch.syst

Hi, Am 29.10.20 um 15:11 schrieb Andreas Tille: Hi, here is a suggested patch for commons-io that would prevent making the test in libsis-base-java fail. It seems this is a six year old unresolved upstream bug. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-449 This should be fixed upstream in

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#973070: Help needed: Bug#973070: libsis-base-java: FTBFS: Could not delete the directory targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests because: 1 exceptions:

Am 28.10.20 um 16:01 schrieb olivier sallou: [...] > *dumb* patch would be to simply remove those tests from code... Either this or you can keep the override for dh_auto_test-arch empty. The test creates a broken symlink but then FileUtils.deleteDirectory fails to delete the file, obviously

Re: Help needed: Bug#973070: libsis-base-java: FTBFS: Could not delete the directory targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests because: 1 exceptions: [java.io.IOException: Unable to de

Hi, This appears to be caused by the recent upgrade of Apache commons-io to version 2.8.0 (we had 2.6), see also #973135. In version 2.7 they removed a throws IOException in the method isSymlink() https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-610 Could it be related to this change? It is probably

Re: Removing netbeans

Am 02.10.20 um 00:29 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 30.09.2020 18:34, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> I wanted to move the idea forward and just pushed a new update of >> netbeans to Git. Currently there is only one reverse-dependency in >> Debian, openstereogram, that requi

Removing netbeans

Am 27.09.20 um 12:55 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: [...] > I fully share Markus' analysis. Packaging these huge projects isn't > viable without more regular, dedicated, contributors. For client side > applications such as Netbeans or Eclipse I tend to think the community > would be better served with

Re: Solr version

Hi tony, [adding only Waldemar to CC because we are subscribed to the list anyway] > Can you post a list of what others can help with? I have made my list a few months ago and just looked into it again. 1. First of all as of version 9.0 solr will use gradle as the new build system. This has

Re: Solr version

Hello, Am 26.09.20 um 14:51 schrieb Waldemar Zahn: > Hi, > > i am currently working on a project running on a Debian 10 server. The > project needs a Solr server. I have installed the solr-tomcat and found that > the version of Solr is very outdated. The version is 3.6.2, the current Solr >

Re: nattable_1.6.0+dfsg-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Hi Vincent, please change the maintainer address of your Java packages to Debian Java Maintainers You are currently using the Java discussion mailing list but the other one is more appropriate for bug reports and status emails. Regards, Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: Changes to get tomcat8 security fixes into Debian 9?

Am 28.04.20 um 10:57 schrieb Andreas Tille: [...] > > Any news about the tomcat backport? Tomcat 8 and Tomcat 9 are currently pending review by the security team. Regards, Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: jflex package

Am 26.04.20 um 01:02 schrieb Gilles Filippini: [...] > Thanks for these explanations. I'd like to have jflex-maven-plugin > packaged as well, but it implies building from the full source tarball > [1] which holds a few other subprojects. Not sure if it's worth the hassle. > > [1]

Re: jflex package

Hi, Am 25.04.20 um 17:51 schrieb Gilles Filippini: > Hi, > > Is the jflex package still maintained? It has no upload since 2018 and > new releases are out, the last one being 1.8.1. > BTW I wonder why the source package is built from the upstream binary > distribution tarball instead of the

Re: Changes to get tomcat8 security fixes into Debian 9?

Hi Andreas, Am 05.03.20 um 09:34 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi, > > I was wondering, whether there is a chance to get CVE-2020-1938 fixed in > Tomcat8 in Stretch? If the chances are low possibly backporting Tomcat9 > to stretch-backports-sloppy would be a feasible way to go for me. What > would

Bug#949479: RM: libxmlrpc3-java -- ROM; EOL,unsupported,RC buggy

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Dear ftp team, please remove libxmlrpc3-java from Debian. The package is no longer actively maintained by upstream and affected by CVE-2019-17570. There are no reverse-dependencies. Regards, Markus

Re: Building Jollyday

Hi, Am 09.01.20 um 17:07 schrieb Mechtilde: [...] > I uploaded it to https://salsa.debian.org/mechtilde/jollyday > > Thanks in advance I had a look at jollyday. The reason why the maven rules are not working is because of your dh_auto_build override. In fact you only call maven-debian-helper

Re: Building Jollyday

Hello, Am 08.01.20 um 18:55 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: [...] What is the proper way to handle it? >> >> The missing class is indeed part of jaxb-api. You need a >> build-dependency on libjaxb-api-java and the build system should point >> to it too. > > I have it as build dependency in

Re: salsa.debian.org/java-team

Hello, Am 07.01.20 um 20:27 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: > Hello, > > I need your help to set the visibility of the project jverein from > internal to public > > Under "Visibility, project features, permissions", I can't open the list > box. > > Thanks in advance I have set the visibility to

Re: Building Jollyday

Am 07.01.20 um 20:20 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: > Hello, > > does nobody have an idea to solve it? > > Kind regards > Mechtilde > > Am 05.01.20 um 14:31 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: >> Hello, >> >> I need help to build the package Jollyday which is a dependency for JVerein. >> >> >> when

Re: "error: Unmet build dependencies: maven default-jdk (>= 2:1.8)" when running dpkg-buildpackage

Hello, Am 26.11.19 um 19:19 schrieb Steinar Bang: > apache maven 3.6.2 (installed from tar-ball, not > from deb package) > > dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: Unmet build dependencies: maven default-jdk (>= > 2:1.8) [...] > Does anyone know what's the underlying error?

Re: jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8-1~exp2 has rejected

Hello Mechthilde, Am 20.11.19 um 20:10 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: > Hello Markus > > Am 19.11.19 um 22:33 schrieb Markus Koschany: >> >> Am 19.11.19 um 22:18 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: >> [...] >>> I already pushed my work without repacking to salsa. I thin

Re: jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8-1~exp2 has rejected

Am 19.11.19 um 22:18 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: [...] > I already pushed my work without repacking to salsa. I think I should > renew it, but I can't remove the old wrong one. You don't need to remove the old files. With git-buildpackage you can do: gbp clone

Re: Help needed to upgrade cdk

Am 19.11.19 um 18:40 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi, > > I've sat together with Egon Willighagen who is member of CDK upstream > team to update the cdk package[1]. So far the switch from ant to maven > seems to have basically succeeded. However, for some reason it does not > build modules in the

Re: jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8-1~exp2 has rejected

Hello, Am 19.11.19 um 09:23 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: > Hello to the list, > > to fullfill the policy I will repack the orig.tar.gz of the package above. > > How ist the best way to do so? > > Should I do a new start to prepare the new package > jax-maven-plugin_0.1.8+dfsg-1~exp1? I believe

Re: Any hints about maven libs from Debian Java team (Was: IGV update - any takers?)

Am 14.11.19 um 14:28 schrieb Olivier Sallou: [...] >> Try to disable the build-dependency and analyze how much code is >> depending on it. Maybe it is not necessary to get a functional IGV >> package, otherwise someone ™ must package it. > > > the pb is to know what is "functional". We may

Re: Any hints about maven libs from Debian Java team (Was: IGV update - any takers?)

Hi, Am 14.11.19 um 09:44 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi, > > I'd be very happy if Debian Java team could comment on the analysis > of libs done by Olivier to enable us upgrading IGV. > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:34:51AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: >> >> I had a quick look at latest version. It

Re: Debian and NetBeans

Hello Geertjan, Am 02.11.19 um 11:59 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Hi Markus, > > Great work, you appear to be making releases of NetBeans available on > Debian, with patches: > > https://sources.debian.org/src/netbeans/10.0-3/debian/patches/ > > How are you doing this, are you keeping track of

Re: uscan: git repo without releases/tags

Hi, Am 03.10.19 um 16:12 schrieb Felix Natter: > hi debian-java, > > I am starting to package libiconloader-java but unfortunately, there > are no releases or tags in the respository: > https://github.com/bulenkov/iconloader > > I kindly asked for a release, but the author does not respond

Re: Migration from ant to maven

Hi, Am 26.09.19 um 12:04 schrieb Ole Streicher: > Hi again, > > Ole Streicher writes: >> So, now the only error I couldn't resolve is the xmlrpc >> dependency. Could you help me there? > > After re-checking the old package, I solved this now by patching out the > compilation of the classes

Re: Migration from ant to maven

Hi, Am 25.09.19 um 17:47 schrieb Ole Streicher: > Hi, > > I just got involved in packaging a Java package (jsamp) that used ant in > the past and "now" (since a few years) moved to maven. Up to now, the > old build.xml is kept locally in the Debian package as a patch and the > package is built

Re: maven-debian-helper and dh's --builddirectory option

Hi, Am 16.09.19 um 16:54 schrieb Lucas Kanashiro: > Hi Markus, > > On 14/09/2019 17:06, Markus Koschany wrote: >> Hi Lucas, >> >> Am 13.09.19 um 20:09 schrieb Lucas Kanashiro: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've recently started to package some j

Re: Try to update jsoup

Am 15.09.19 um 08:19 schrieb Mechtilde: > Good morning Markus, > > a supplementary question > > Can I split the patch into single patches for each file? It is up to you and how you would like to maintain the package. I usually say "one patch for one problem" but some people like to make one

Re: Prepared update libyaml-snake-java

Am 15.09.19 um 08:06 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: [...] >> I think the package looks good. You don't need to append the +ds in this >> case and I suggest to just package it as 1.25. > > To not mark a version as a repacked version was the reason, that it > takes much time for me to understand how

Re: Try to update jsoup

Am 14.09.19 um 23:04 schrieb Mechtilde: > I can C https://salsa.debian.org/mechtilde/jsoup I get a 404 error message when I click on the link. > And I can pushit to the main repo too. Now I can see your changes at https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jsoup. It appears there was some kind of

Re: Try to update jsoup

Am 14.09.19 um 22:31 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: > Hello Markus > > I did some more test to update libjsoup-java. [...] >> I suggest to push your changes to >> https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jsoup/ because it makes it easier to >> work on it. I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve with

Re: Prepared update libyaml-snake-java

Hi, Am 14.09.19 um 21:44 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: > Hello, > > Succesfully I build an update version 1.25. > > The repo is under > > https://salsa.debian.org/mechtilde/snakeyaml > > you can also find it under > > https://people.debian.org/~mechtilde/SnakeYaml > > I hope to get some

Re: maven-debian-helper and dh's --builddirectory option

Hi Lucas, Am 13.09.19 um 20:09 schrieb Lucas Kanashiro: > Hi, > > I've recently started to package some java libraries (old versions for a > specific project, not suitable for the Debian archive) and I am facing > an issue when I am building a Maven based project using the dh's >

Re: Try to update jsoup

Hello, Am 13.09.19 um 21:02 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: > Hello, > > I try to update jsoup too. During the buildprocess in pbuilder I get the > message > dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are: > jsoup/src/test/java/org/jsoup/parser/TokeniserStateTest.java >

Re: New Package JVerein

Hello Mechtilde, Am 25.08.19 um 08:24 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: > Hello, > > I want to work at this new Package on Salsa too. > > I want to join the team Debian Java Maintainers. > > My username is Mechtilde I've just added you to the java-team on salsa. Cheers, Markus signature.asc

Re: Packaging NatTable, more details

Am 22.08.19 um 10:35 schrieb Vincent Prat: > Le 19/08/2019 à 15:46, Vincent Prat a écrit : >> Hi all, >> >> I have finished packaging the core library using eclipse-debian-helper. >> Should I also package extensions even if I do not plan to use them? You don't need to package the extensions if

Re: CI on salsa

Hello, Am 18.08.19 um 14:46 schrieb Hideki Yamane: > Hi, > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:22:45 +0900 > Hideki Yamane wrote: >> I cannot find CI setting on salsa for jcodings and jruby-joni package >> https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jruby-joni >> https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jcodings >>

Re: New here

Hello Vincent, Am 15.08.19 um 01:31 schrieb Vincent Prat: > Hi everybody, > > My name is Vincent, and I am a DM (applying for becoming a DD). > So far I have mainly worked on astronomy-related packages and games. > I intend to adopt a science-related package, but it is written in Java > and

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >