Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
i have two PC's on this level and have not seen strange behaviour as of today. Luc Diederik de Haas schreef op 25 mei 2023 09:43:03 UTC: >On Friday, 19 May 2023 13:11:01 CEST Luc Castermans wrote: >> I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, using: >> >> aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2' >> aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0' > >I hadn't upgraded to those packages, but earlier today I did reboot my laptop >and when I logged in, my desktop was completely blank and no longer had the >icons and plasma widgets I had on them. > >After doing `aptitude safe-upgrade '~i~V5\.27\.2' -t experimental` and another >reboot (maybe a logout/login would be sufficient; we'll never know), I had my >normal desktop back. > >I haven't yet tried upgrade Frameworks, but the Plasma package update >definitely fixed an issue on my laptop. > >Cheers, > Diederik
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
On Friday, 19 May 2023 13:11:01 CEST Luc Castermans wrote: > I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, using: > > aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2' > aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0' I hadn't upgraded to those packages, but earlier today I did reboot my laptop and when I logged in, my desktop was completely blank and no longer had the icons and plasma widgets I had on them. After doing `aptitude safe-upgrade '~i~V5\.27\.2' -t experimental` and another reboot (maybe a logout/login would be sufficient; we'll never know), I had my normal desktop back. I haven't yet tried upgrade Frameworks, but the Plasma package update definitely fixed an issue on my laptop. Cheers, Diederik signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Le 20 mai 2023 09:11:56 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans a écrit : >indeed. The command should have contained 104 instead of 103 Nope, Martin corrected me on that, the expression selects the packages that you *want* to upgrade so 5.103.0 / 5.27.2 are correct. Best, -- Aurélien
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
indeed. The command should have contained 104 instead of 103 Luc Martin Steigerwald schreef op 19 mei 2023 13:52:24 UTC: >Hi, > >Aurélien COUDERC - 19.05.23, 14:41:44 CEST: >> Le 19 mai 2023 13:11:01 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans > a écrit : >> >Dear >> > >> >I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, >> >using: >> > >> >aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2' >> >aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0' >> >> You probably meant 104 for the second command otherwise I don't see >> the point. > >The version you specify is the version you like to upgrade to >experimental. So 103 is about right. > >I will postpone upgrading to 5.104 a bit longer. So far all is fine and >Plasma 5.27.5 works nicely. > >Thanks, >-- >Martin > >
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Le 19 mai 2023 15:52:24 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald a écrit : >Hi, > >Aurélien COUDERC - 19.05.23, 14:41:44 CEST: >> Le 19 mai 2023 13:11:01 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans > a écrit : >> >Dear >> > >> >I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, >> >using: >> > >> >aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2' >> >aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0' >> >> You probably meant 104 for the second command otherwise I don't see >> the point. > >The version you specify is the version you like to upgrade to >experimental. So 103 is about right. > >I will postpone upgrading to 5.104 a bit longer. So far all is fine and >Plasma 5.27.5 works nicely. Indeed, thanks.
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Hi, Aurélien COUDERC - 19.05.23, 14:41:44 CEST: > Le 19 mai 2023 13:11:01 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans a écrit : > >Dear > > > >I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, > >using: > > > >aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2' > >aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0' > > You probably meant 104 for the second command otherwise I don't see > the point. The version you specify is the version you like to upgrade to experimental. So 103 is about right. I will postpone upgrading to 5.104 a bit longer. So far all is fine and Plasma 5.27.5 works nicely. Thanks, -- Martin
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
19/05/2023 09:44, Luc Castermans wrote: I installed Frameworks 104. All looks great! Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12 KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.5 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.104.0 I upgraded a Sid system to both plasma and Framework, if you have development packages installed Framework requires manual intervention in aptitude to upgrade successfully, at least for me. I am using Wayland only, and so far I saw a difference in how High DPI (2K screen) is handled for Mozilla applications (Firefox and Thunderbird, both from Debian repo). Both had their UI mangled, being way too big and not following the rest of the system for fonts and scaling. Also saw rapid flickering in drop-down menus in non-plasma applications. I fixed Mozilla apps, but still got occasional flickering breaking the use of drop-down menus. Downgrading Plasma and Framework doesn't restore Mozilla (and possibly other GTK) apps UI. I ended up restoring from backup to Sid. So not all smooth, probably due to Framework and not PLasma. I will try Plasma only this W-E.
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
You probably meant 104 for the second command otherwise I don't see the point. Le 19 mai 2023 13:11:01 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans a écrit : >Dear > >I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, using: > >aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2' >aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0' > >Now it is running > >Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12 >KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.5 >KDE Frameworks Version: 5.104.0 >Qt Version: 5.15.8 >Kernel Version: 6.1.0-9-amd64 (64-bit) >Graphics Platform: X11 >Processors: 12 × AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor >Memory: 31.3 GiB of RAM >Graphics Processor: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030/PCIe/SSE2 >Manufacturer: BIOSTAR Group >Product Name: A320MH > >Thank you very much team!! > >Luc > > >Op 19-05-2023 om 10:09 schreef Aurélien COUDERC: >> >> Le 19 mai 2023 09:00:37 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald >> a écrit : >>> Hi Luc. >>> >>> Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST: On top and for the record. I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well. >>> Installing as well. >>> >>> I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability? >>> But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no >>> regression compared to the current state. >> Yes, useful for us there so we get some feedback that we're not talking >> nonsense when saying the new version is an improvement. >> >> But please don't contact the release team directly nor comment on the >> unblock bug report about bit, it would only add noise and make our case more >> difficult. >> >> Also if people here could find the time to try and mix some .2 and .5 >> packages and report back, that would be useful to confirm it doesn't break >> more than it fixes. >> In particular mixing core components like kwin, libkscreen, plasmas >> workspace/desktop would be interesting tests. >> >> We may get a signoff for some but not all packages. >> >> >> Thanks all for your tests, feedback and support ! >> >> -- >> Aurélien >> >-- >m.vr.gr. > >Luc Castermans >mailto:luc.casterm...@gmail.com
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Dear I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, using: aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2' aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0' Now it is running Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12 KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.5 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.104.0 Qt Version: 5.15.8 Kernel Version: 6.1.0-9-amd64 (64-bit) Graphics Platform: X11 Processors: 12 × AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor Memory: 31.3 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030/PCIe/SSE2 Manufacturer: BIOSTAR Group Product Name: A320MH Thank you very much team!! Luc Op 19-05-2023 om 10:09 schreef Aurélien COUDERC: Le 19 mai 2023 09:00:37 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald a écrit : Hi Luc. Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST: On top and for the record. I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well. Installing as well. I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability? But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no regression compared to the current state. Yes, useful for us there so we get some feedback that we're not talking nonsense when saying the new version is an improvement. But please don't contact the release team directly nor comment on the unblock bug report about bit, it would only add noise and make our case more difficult. Also if people here could find the time to try and mix some .2 and .5 packages and report back, that would be useful to confirm it doesn't break more than it fixes. In particular mixing core components like kwin, libkscreen, plasmas workspace/desktop would be interesting tests. We may get a signoff for some but not all packages. Thanks all for your tests, feedback and support ! -- Aurélien -- m.vr.gr. Luc Castermans mailto:luc.casterm...@gmail.com
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Sedat Dilek - 19.05.23, 11:24:18 CEST: > In my email-client: > Reply: Martin Steigerwald > Reply-all: Martin Steigerwald + ML <--- My default (dropping you each > time is extra-time for me as well) Well it is easy: I provided support. I did not ask for support. In case I decide to limit my time in providing support I will first drop answering to mails that are in copy to me. I.e. your mails. It is simple as that, cause I decide how I spend my time. And I may limit it, especially in case I feel a lack of respect for the time I use to help others along. There can be reasons for CC to make someone aware of a mail one may otherwise miss. I don't need that. Especially I don't need that for a low volume mailing list like this. For each CC'd mail I receive two copies of the mail with mailing lists for the Debian community – mailing lists for the KDE community are set up differently. In case I reply to the wrong one, I break the thread. And it just happened with that thread already. I simply do not like to deal with this kind of hassle by default. Also please look at this Code of Conduct for Debian mailing lists: "When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a carbon copy (CC) to the original poster unless they explicitly request to be copied." https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct Now you either respect my wish, or you don't. And I decide what I do with that. Best, -- Martin
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
On Friday, 19 May 2023 09:19:31 CEST Martin Steigerwald wrote: > % aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2' You can use 'safe-upgrade' instead of 'install' signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:30 AM Aurélien COUDERC wrote: > > > > Le 19 mai 2023 09:39:52 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald a > écrit : > >No need to copy me directly. Actually I prefer that you do not. Creates > >extra work for me. > > > >Sedat Dilek - 19.05.23, 09:28:46 CEST: > >> Did you install and test KDE/Frameworks version 5.104? > > > >No. > > > >I am not aware of any plans to get KDE Frameworks 5.104 or later into > >Bookworm. > > No we have no plans for that. > > The ratio of important bug fixed vs. total number of packages to upgrade > isn't worth it. > > If you identify specific bugs that affect you we may try and back port > individual fixes. > Thanks for the information I just upgraded to KP/5.27.5 (only - NOT KF/5.104) successfully. -Sedat-
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:40 AM Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > No need to copy me directly. Actually I prefer that you do not. Creates > extra work for me. > In my email-client: Reply: Martin Steigerwald Reply-all: Martin Steigerwald + ML <--- My default (dropping you each time is extra-time for me as well) -Sedat-
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:19 AM Martin Steigerwald wrote: ... > Plasma 5.27.5 installed here. > > % aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2' > > % dpkg -l | grep "5\.27\.2" > [… no output …] > > I bet there is a variant for this for "apt" as well, but I never looked > it up. > Just for the records: That aptitude command marked all my packages to be (auto)removed with status "ri" (was "ii"). (For me, aptitude is and will not be the 1st choice of upgrade-tool.) The Good is all my packages are of versions which are really downloadable from any Debian repositories. So, a nice but unwanted cleanup. -Sedat-
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
On Friday, 19 May 2023 10:09:56 CEST Aurélien COUDERC wrote: > Also if people here could find the time to try and mix some .2 and .5 > packages and report back, that would be useful to confirm it doesn't break > more than it fixes. In particular mixing core components like kwin, > libkscreen, plasmas workspace/desktop would be interesting tests. If you have an exact list of packages + versions, I can test those exact combinations (which seems more useful then a random mix). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Dear Aurélien Aurélien COUDERC - 19.05.23, 10:09:56 CEST: > But please don't contact the release team directly nor comment on the > unblock bug report about bit, it would only add noise and make our > case more difficult. Thanks for your clarification. I thought so as well as an aftermath of my mail and recommended not to send anything to the unblock bug report in another mail. Also thanks for your confirmation regarding KF. Best, -- Martin
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
yep. i was lucky indeed. Only i had to repair a SSL package. LibreOffice got upgraded but i was okay with that Luc Martin Steigerwald schreef op 19 mei 2023 07:45:13 UTC: >Luc Castermans - 19.05.23, 09:38:23 CEST: >> On one machine I performed a >> >> apt upgrade -t experimental > >Without limiting the set of packages to upgrade? If so, you likely have >installed all packages from experimental, possibly including some that >are really experimental. One may argue whether experimental is the right >place for bug fix updates during the release cycle, but it is used that >way. However outside of release cycle it is used for test versions of >software. So you may have installed all kinds of funny and really >unstable stuff on your system. > >Don't do that! > >I'd never ever do that. I posted the exact aptitude call for a reason. > >However maybe I am going to refrain from posting the exact commands >again, so that people need to figure it out themselves and learn about >the possible consequences. > >Anyway, you get you keep the pieces if anything breaks. > >> After which I needed to make few corrections on non-KDE related >> packages. The machine is running fine!! > >As far as you can see after just a few minutes. > >Best, >-- >Martin > >
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Le 19 mai 2023 09:39:52 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald a écrit : >No need to copy me directly. Actually I prefer that you do not. Creates >extra work for me. > >Sedat Dilek - 19.05.23, 09:28:46 CEST: >> Did you install and test KDE/Frameworks version 5.104? > >No. > >I am not aware of any plans to get KDE Frameworks 5.104 or later into >Bookworm. No we have no plans for that. The ratio of important bug fixed vs. total number of packages to upgrade isn't worth it. If you identify specific bugs that affect you we may try and back port individual fixes. Happy hacking, -- Aurélien
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Le 19 mai 2023 09:00:37 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald a écrit : >Hi Luc. > >Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST: >> On top and for the record. >> >> I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental >> yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well. > >Installing as well. > >I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability? >But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no >regression compared to the current state. Yes, useful for us there so we get some feedback that we're not talking nonsense when saying the new version is an improvement. But please don't contact the release team directly nor comment on the unblock bug report about bit, it would only add noise and make our case more difficult. Also if people here could find the time to try and mix some .2 and .5 packages and report back, that would be useful to confirm it doesn't break more than it fixes. In particular mixing core components like kwin, libkscreen, plasmas workspace/desktop would be interesting tests. We may get a signoff for some but not all packages. Thanks all for your tests, feedback and support ! -- Aurélien
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Luc Castermans - 19.05.23, 09:38:23 CEST: > On one machine I performed a > > apt upgrade -t experimental Without limiting the set of packages to upgrade? If so, you likely have installed all packages from experimental, possibly including some that are really experimental. One may argue whether experimental is the right place for bug fix updates during the release cycle, but it is used that way. However outside of release cycle it is used for test versions of software. So you may have installed all kinds of funny and really unstable stuff on your system. Don't do that! I'd never ever do that. I posted the exact aptitude call for a reason. However maybe I am going to refrain from posting the exact commands again, so that people need to figure it out themselves and learn about the possible consequences. Anyway, you get you keep the pieces if anything breaks. > After which I needed to make few corrections on non-KDE related > packages. The machine is running fine!! As far as you can see after just a few minutes. Best, -- Martin
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
I installed Frameworks 104. All looks great! Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12 KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.5 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.104.0 Qt Version: 5.15.8 Kernel Version: 6.3.0-0-amd64 (64-bit) Graphics Platform: X11 Processors: 4 × Intel® Core™ i5-4200U CPU @ 1.60GHz Memory: 7.2 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: Mesa Intel® HD Graphics 4400 Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard Product Name: HP ProBook 430 G1 System Version: A3009CD20303 Op vr 19 mei 2023 om 09:40 schreef Martin Steigerwald : > No need to copy me directly. Actually I prefer that you do not. Creates > extra work for me. > > Sedat Dilek - 19.05.23, 09:28:46 CEST: > > Did you install and test KDE/Frameworks version 5.104? > > No. > > I am not aware of any plans to get KDE Frameworks 5.104 or later into > Bookworm. AFAIK Frameworks consists of a lot more packages than Plasma. > I don't see how KDE Frameworks 5.104 or later can still enter Bookworm > before the release. > > So I'd rather test with 5.103 for now. If that works well I intend to > give a feedback there. Then I may still decide to upgrade KF to 5.104. > > I wonder whether it might be a good idea to allow for an update during > the stable cycle. > > Ciao, > -- > Martin > > > -- Luc Castermans mailto:luc.casterm...@gmail.com
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
No need to copy me directly. Actually I prefer that you do not. Creates extra work for me. Sedat Dilek - 19.05.23, 09:28:46 CEST: > Did you install and test KDE/Frameworks version 5.104? No. I am not aware of any plans to get KDE Frameworks 5.104 or later into Bookworm. AFAIK Frameworks consists of a lot more packages than Plasma. I don't see how KDE Frameworks 5.104 or later can still enter Bookworm before the release. So I'd rather test with 5.103 for now. If that works well I intend to give a feedback there. Then I may still decide to upgrade KF to 5.104. I wonder whether it might be a good idea to allow for an update during the stable cycle. Ciao, -- Martin
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Hi On one machine I performed a apt upgrade -t experimental After which I needed to make few corrections on non-KDE related packages. The machine is running fine!! On the other machine the upgrade did not succeed due to failing dependencies. It went back to stable. Regards, Luc Op 19-05-2023 om 09:15 schreef Sedat Dilek: On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:01 AM Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi Luc. Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST: On top and for the record. I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well. Installing as well. Hi Martin, Hi Luc, Can you share how you upgraded to KDE/Plasma version 5.25.5? Thanks. Best regards, -Sedat- I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability? But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no regression compared to the current state. Ciao, -- Martin -- m.vr.gr. Luc Castermans mailto:luc.casterm...@gmail.com
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:19 AM Martin Steigerwald wrote: ... > Plasma 5.27.5 installed here. > > % aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2' > > % dpkg -l | grep "5\.27\.2" > [… no output …] > Hi Martin, I can confirm... Installed 102 packages - upgradable packages available 102 - looks good on a simulated upgrade. Did you install and test KDE/Frameworks version 5.104? Here 275 packages installed - on a simulated upgrade the same amount of packages. Thanks. Best regards, -Sedat-
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Martin Steigerwald - 19.05.23, 09:19:31 CEST: > I recommend against posting to the bug report, the Qt/KDE team is > doing a marvelous job at arguing in favor of having at least the > packages with changes or at least with non-cosmetic changes from > 5.27.5 in Bookworm. Please let them do their job. […] Or in favor of having all of Plasma 5.27.5 in a point release for Bookworm. For me both approaches would work well. The point is to get those bug fixes into stable. For my machines it does not matter, I am following unstable anyway. However for some machines I administrate for others it makes a difference. Ciao, -- Martin
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Hi, Martin Steigerwald - 19.05.23, 09:00:37 CEST: > Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST: > > On top and for the record. > > > > I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental > > yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well. > > Installing as well. > > I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability? > But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no > regression compared to the current state. Please keep in mind that the release team raised valid concerns. And on any account it is important to treat them with respect. They are doing a challenging job on a challenging time frame. You know Debian Stable is called stable for a reason! To ensure that it requires excellent cooperation between the package developers and the release time. Please respect that. I recommend against posting to the bug report, the Qt/KDE team is doing a marvelous job at arguing in favor of having at least the packages with changes or at least with non-cosmetic changes from 5.27.5 in Bookworm. Please let them do their job. In case you installed 5.27.5 from experimental, tested it and like to vote on its stability, please do so here. And for not on the bug report. Someone from the Qt/KDE team can point to the thread with the votes if need be. Plasma 5.27.5 installed here. % aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2' % dpkg -l | grep "5\.27\.2" [… no output …] I bet there is a variant for this for "apt" as well, but I never looked it up. Please only do so if you are willing to help testing and are careful about reading apt/aptitude output and about aborting the process in case it likes to remove packages you'd rather want to keep. Here I had no issues with upgrading, but that does not mean that it works on your system as well. Best, -- Martin
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:01 AM Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Hi Luc. > > Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST: > > On top and for the record. > > > > I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental > > yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well. > > Installing as well. > Hi Martin, Hi Luc, Can you share how you upgraded to KDE/Plasma version 5.25.5? Thanks. Best regards, -Sedat- > I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability? > But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no > regression compared to the current state. > > Ciao, > -- > Martin > >
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
+1 Op 19-05-2023 om 09:00 schreef Martin Steigerwald: Hi Luc. Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST: On top and for the record. I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well. Installing as well. I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability? But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no regression compared to the current state. Ciao, -- m.vr.gr. Luc Castermans mailto:luc.casterm...@gmail.com
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Hi Luc. Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST: > On top and for the record. > > I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental > yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well. Installing as well. I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability? But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no regression compared to the current state. Ciao, -- Martin
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Hi On top and for the record. I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well. Thanks!! Luc Op ma 15 mei 2023 om 17:53 schreef Martin Steigerwald : > Hi Merlin, > > Merlin Cooper - 15.05.23, 16:35:59 CEST: > > Are there any plans to upload Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106 to > > Unstable and unblock them for inclusion in Testing? The Full Freeze > > is coming up soon, and Unstable / Testing are still stuck on Plasma > > 5.27.2 and Frameworks 5.103. The newer versions fix tons of bugs > > (including many Wayland bugs), so their inclusion in Debian 12 would > > be supremely appreciated by Debian KDE users. > > Please see > > bug #1035056 [pre-approval] plasma-desktop 5.27.X > > https://bugs.debian.org/1035056 > > As well as IRC channel #debian-qt-kde > > Best, > -- > Martin > > > -- Luc Castermans mailto:luc.casterm...@gmail.com
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:51 AM Merlin Cooper wrote: > (I accidentally sent this email directly to Coufcouf and DeltaOne, I > should have posted it to the list... sorry!) > > Hello, > > Are there any plans to upload Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106 to > Unstable and unblock them for inclusion in Testing? The Full Freeze is > coming up soon, and Unstable / Testing are still stuck on Plasma 5.27.2 and > Frameworks 5.103. The newer versions fix tons of bugs (including many > Wayland bugs), so their inclusion in Debian 12 would be supremely > appreciated by Debian KDE users. > > I see no reason why an unblock request wouldn't be granted considering > GNOME 43.4 was allowed to migrate recently, and these new versions focus > only on fixing bugs rather than adding features. > > I hope you consider uploading Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106 to > Unstable, and requesting an unblock so they can migrate to Testing and be > included in Debian 12, that way Debian KDE users can have the best possible > experience. > You are not alone. I would also like to see plasma 5.27.5 or newer updated in Bookworm. Tim > Thank you for all your hard work! > Merlin > -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/ ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀
Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
Hi Merlin, Merlin Cooper - 15.05.23, 16:35:59 CEST: > Are there any plans to upload Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106 to > Unstable and unblock them for inclusion in Testing? The Full Freeze > is coming up soon, and Unstable / Testing are still stuck on Plasma > 5.27.2 and Frameworks 5.103. The newer versions fix tons of bugs > (including many Wayland bugs), so their inclusion in Debian 12 would > be supremely appreciated by Debian KDE users. Please see bug #1035056 [pre-approval] plasma-desktop 5.27.X https://bugs.debian.org/1035056 As well as IRC channel #debian-qt-kde Best, -- Martin
Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106
(I accidentally sent this email directly to Coufcouf and DeltaOne, I should have posted it to the list... sorry!) Hello, Are there any plans to upload Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106 to Unstable and unblock them for inclusion in Testing? The Full Freeze is coming up soon, and Unstable / Testing are still stuck on Plasma 5.27.2 and Frameworks 5.103. The newer versions fix tons of bugs (including many Wayland bugs), so their inclusion in Debian 12 would be supremely appreciated by Debian KDE users. I see no reason why an unblock request wouldn't be granted considering GNOME 43.4 was allowed to migrate recently, and these new versions focus only on fixing bugs rather than adding features. I hope you consider uploading Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106 to Unstable, and requesting an unblock so they can migrate to Testing and be included in Debian 12, that way Debian KDE users can have the best possible experience. Thank you for all your hard work! Merlin
