On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 02:54:47AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:35:56PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Quite honestly, I don't think we deviate enough from the mainline kernels
enough to warrant such a thing. The main patches we include are the stable
kernel
Hallo I have a problem with linux-headers 2.6.12-1-k7. I cant build
modulesdebs with this headers and make-kpkg modules-image.
Or I must use an würg-arrond. I must create this to symbolic links in
direktory linux-headers-2.6.12-1-k7
ln -s -v ../linux-headers-2.6.12-1/arch/ arch
ln -s -v
Let your child grow with the best software...
http://xmh.gnmgmc3b3am6ggyt3gytlggy.tranquil.com/?pslk
You don't get anything clean without getting something else dirty.
Afflicted by love's madness all are blind.
Practice, the master of all things.
Many things have fallen
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 12:05:43PM +0200, Matthias Erich Popp wrote:
Hallo I have a problem with linux-headers 2.6.12-1-k7. I cant build
modulesdebs with this headers and make-kpkg modules-image.
Or I must use an würg-arrond. I must create this to symbolic links in
direktory
Am Sonntag, 11. September 2005 12:48 schrieb Sven Luther:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 12:05:43PM +0200, Matthias Erich Popp wrote:
Hallo I have a problem with linux-headers 2.6.12-1-k7. I cant build
modulesdebs with this headers and make-kpkg modules-image.
Or I must use an würg-arrond. I
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:08:45PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:18:50PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
So, the installer needs to be fixed ASAP.
Getting a useable kernel into testing is a prerequsite for making the
installer use it, not the other way
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important
Hi, the following packages :
# out of date on hppa: linux-headers-2.6-32, linux-headers-2.6-32-smp,
# linux-headers-2.6-64, linux-headers-2.6-64-smp, linux-headers-2.6.12-1-32,
# linux-headers-2.6.12-1-32-smp, linux-headers-2.6.12-1-64,
#
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 325704 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5064
Bug#325704: Kernel oops with c2faxsend
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5064.
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:59:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
(...) but I don't see any reason to override britney's judgement regarding
the out-of-date hppa packages.
Please get an ftp-master to rene the old binaries, and then linux-2.6
can go into testing.
Done, fwiw.
On Sun, Sep 11,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:59:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
(...) but I don't see any reason to override britney's judgement regarding
the out-of-date hppa packages.
Please get an ftp-master to rene the old binaries,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 02:24:01PM +0200, Matthias Erich Popp wrote:
Am Sonntag, 11. September 2005 12:48 schrieb Sven Luther:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 12:05:43PM +0200, Matthias Erich Popp wrote:
Hallo I have a problem with linux-headers 2.6.12-1-k7. I cant build
modulesdebs with this
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 06:01:26PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 07:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
and report data ? If so, you may look into the popularity context package ?
Does that work for all distro out there? Could you post the url of
the equivalent of a
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 07:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
and report data ? If so, you may look into the popularity context package ?
Does that work for all distro out there? Could you post the url of
the equivalent of a klive.cpushare.com chart so we can compare? (google
pointed me to the
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 06:10:47PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Nope,; it works for debian packages. But you can match that to kernels.
not quite, you never know what kernel the system is running if you don't
call uname -r sorry. Note that klive is written for _mainline_ kernels,
see the homepage
Am Sonntag, 11. September 2005 18:01 schrieb Sven Luther:
Mmm, not sure i follow what you are trying to say
Friendly,
sven Luther
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-k7 2.6.12-1 is working.
but
linux-headers-2-6-12-1-k7 2.6.12-6 is not working
with best regards from Dortmund
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:29:49PM +0200, Matthias Erich Popp wrote:
Am Sonntag, 11. September 2005 18:01 schrieb Sven Luther:
Mmm, not sure i follow what you are trying to say
Friendly,
sven Luther
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-k7 2.6.12-1 is working.
but
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: normal
The maximum volume you may set using kernel 2.6.12 on a powerbook g4
Titanium
is almost zero. 2.6.11 works well.
Please note that 'beep' is working at the normal level, so it may
be a problem related to only PCM channel.
Hello,
As you probably know, the 2.6.13 kernel is out, and we are facing some
problems with packaging it for Debian. A major change compared to 2.6.12
is the discontinued support for devfs, which, I understand, renders
current initrd-tools unusable. As I see it, there are two major problems
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Tim Schmielau wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 Horms wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:50:03PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
This breaks the accounting format, so it's a change that needs a lot
of thought.
I agree, though it is curious that it is
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:51:43PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: normal
The maximum volume you may set using kernel 2.6.12 on a powerbook g4
Titanium
is almost zero. 2.6.11 works well.
Please note that 'beep' is working at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 320042 +pending
Bug#320042: conflicting files with kernel-doc-2.6.11
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
As you probably know, the 2.6.13 kernel is out, and we are facing some
problems with packaging it for Debian. A major change compared to 2.6.12
is the
22 matches
Mail list logo
