Package: initramfs-tools
Severity: normal
I did an dist-upgrade to etch, now that etch is released, and noticed that
the ramdisk is updated twice for the udev and the initramfs-tools upgrade.
possibly three times, when the kernel is upgraded as well.
This is a less than ideal situation,
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070409 09:34]:
This is a less than ideal situation, especially given how long the
initramfs-tools ramdisk generation takes, and it would be better if in some
way there could be a detection that it will have to run multiple times, and
the upgrade be queued for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 417324 normal
Bug#417324: linux-2.6: UTF-8 is the system-wide default encoding in Debian but
kernel's filesystem modules use ISO-8859-1
Severity set to `normal' from `important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
severity 417324 normal
thanks
According to Etch release notes this is a known issue. I'll downgrade
the severity since this does not affect every Debian installation and
desktop environments handle correctly the mounting of removable media
with FAT filesystems.
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Steps to reproduce:
ha0 and ha1 are eth0 and eth1 renamed with udev at
/etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules
ha is a bonding dev with ha0 and ha1 as slaves.
# ip link
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18-4
Severity: normal
See eg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/90597
yours Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2007-04-07 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Christian Hammers wrote:
Users of sarge+backports.org suffer the problem that their GRUB does not
know how to load the hypervisor module. Please add the following to give
them a hint:Conflict: grub ( 0.97-16)
(This could, of course, be
I am a victim of abuse.. a person put my email in much mailing list...
PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME
Guia Artistica
www.guiaartistica.com.ar
-Mensaje original-
De: Christian Hammers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Lunes, 09 de Abril de 2007 08:07 a.m.
Para: Jonas Smedegaard
CC:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.85f
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/sbin/update-initramfs
update-initramfs builds a new initramfs file system, packs it up, and
deletes the directory built before packing.
For analysis, it would be great to be able to take a look into the
file system, so it
Boris Andratzek wrote:
Andy wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 03:21:16PM +0100, Boris Andratzek wrote:
Boris Andratzek wrote:
Hello members of the kernel-list,
I'm new to this and hope I don't misuse the list in any way.
Doing the update from debian sarge to etch on my server I ran into the
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 01:38:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Sure, I can handle them.
Okay.
You want to use the -XetchY namespace for security builds and the -X for
p-u uploads? The first is no problem, but the later is if we don't
update linux-2.6 in testing ASAP.
Rebuild on every linux-2.6
Hi folks
I think we should upload 2.6.20 to unstable ASAP. It seems to work for
most of us, except that the xen patch is not of that good quality.
After that we can merge 2.6.21-rc6 and upload it to experimental.
Bastian
--
Love sometimes expresses itself in sacrifice.
--
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:51:59PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
I think we should upload 2.6.20 to unstable ASAP. It seems to work for
most of us, except that the xen patch is not of that good quality.
After that we can merge 2.6.21-rc6 and upload it to experimental.
Fine with me.
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:51:59PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
I think we should upload 2.6.20 to unstable ASAP. It seems to work for
most of us, except that the xen patch is not of that good quality.
yup, sounds cool.
After that we can merge 2.6.21-rc6 and upload it to experimental.
i have
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:15:55PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.85f
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/sbin/update-initramfs
update-initramfs builds a new initramfs file system, packs it up, and
deletes the directory built before packing.
For analysis, it
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007, dann frazier wrote:
From what I can tell, the following packages need to updated along
with linux-2.6 (in dists/etch/dependent-pkgs in svn). Are there any
obvious ones missing?
Rebuild on every linux-2.6 update
-
fai-kernels
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070409 16:48]:
You want to use the -XetchY namespace for security builds and the -X for
p-u uploads? The first is no problem, but the later is if we don't
update linux-2.6 in testing ASAP.
Well, don't you plan to upload linux-2.6 soon anyways? :)
Cheers,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:48:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 01:38:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Sure, I can handle them.
Okay.
You want to use the -XetchY namespace for security builds and the -X for
p-u uploads? The first is no problem, but the later is if
Accepted:
libusplash-dev_0.4-43-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/u/usplash/libusplash-dev_0.4-43-1_i386.deb
libusplash0_0.4-43-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/u/usplash/libusplash0_0.4-43-1_i386.deb
usplash_0.4-43-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/u/usplash/usplash_0.4-43-1.diff.gz
usplash_0.4-43-1.dsc
to
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:05:44 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#380750: fixed in usplash 0.4-43-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:05:44 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397970: fixed in usplash 0.4-43-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:05:44 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#383249: fixed in usplash 0.4-43-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:05:44 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#382675: fixed in usplash 0.4-43-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:05:44 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#384812: fixed in usplash 0.4-43-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Could you please enable CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE in the default debian
kernel?
It's needed for blktrace, which I'm planning to upload to unstable
soonish, now that the freeze is over. It would be great if we could
get it to work out of the box, without the
linux-2.6_2.6.20-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.20-1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.20.orig.tar.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.20-1.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.20_2.6.20-1_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.20_2.6.20-1_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.20_2.6.20-1_all.deb
I can confirm this problem on the 2.6.18-3-vserver-amd64 and
2.6.18-4-vserver-amd64 kernels.
I have noticed with two routes packets will be sent to a gateway with the
wrong source address (right for the other gateway).
More references to this problem
Hello!
I think that linux-image-*-vserver-686 should have bigmem analog
or have CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G enabled by default, since many
people uses vservers on 'big' hardvare for virtualization.
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-vserver-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
linux-2.6_2.6.20-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.20-1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.20-1.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.20-1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.20.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.20.orig.tar.gz
(new) linux-doc-2.6.20_2.6.20-1_all.deb optional doc
Linux
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:06:51PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
On 2007-04-07 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Christian Hammers wrote:
Users of sarge+backports.org suffer the problem that their GRUB does not
know how to load the hypervisor module. Please add the following to give
Your message dated Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:03:51 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#412850: Please add GRUB/sarge conflict for users of
backports.org
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.20-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.20-1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.20-1.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.20-1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.20.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.20.orig.tar.gz
linux-doc-2.6.20_2.6.20-1_all.deb
to
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:23:19 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#338404: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.20-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
#
tags 338404 pending
Bug#338404: initramfs-tools: /dev/[tp]ty[a-ep-z][0-9a-f] are created. This
wastes time and RAM and does no good.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tags 414792
Hi!
I've just done an apt-get dist-upgrade to the release Etch (wohoo!), and
I'm starting to dabble with Vserver a bit, so I installed the
xen-vserver kernel.
Funny thing is - I can't convince Grub that it's a kernel image -- it says
Error 13: Invalid or unsupported executable format.
35 matches
Mail list logo
