Bug#392015: supported arches

2007-05-08 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
I'd like to add that OpenVZ kernel also supports ppc (powerpc64) and sparc64. Support for other arches is almost trivial to add, given the hardware to test the stuff. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#421879: cpufreq_ondemand: cpufreq_ondemand responds too slowly

2007-05-08 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 01:49:17AM +0100, Greg Kochanski wrote: > I got the following response from Intel. It's a little confused, > perhaps. Or, maybe if you have ACPI turned on properly, perhaps > the kernel can read the latency from the processor itself. Yes, it's a bit confusing/confused.

: Favor confirmar

2007-05-08 Thread G.Carvalho
, Gostariamos de saber se recebeu nosso e-mail sobre como adquirir os ? Tudo pronto para iniciar a sua divulgaçao? Cordi

Bug#421730: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.20-1-686: fails to boot from external usb HD - doesn't wait long enough for root device to show up)

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 May 2007 11:36:19 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line linux-image-2.6.20-1-686: fails to boot from external usb HD - doesn't wait long enough for root device to show up has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#421879: cpufreq_ondemand: cpufreq_ondemand responds too slowly

2007-05-08 Thread Greg Kochanski
I got the following response from Intel. It's a little confused, perhaps. Or, maybe if you have ACPI turned on properly, perhaps the kernel can read the latency from the processor itself. Anyhow, he says that the latency is 10 - 100 microseconds for Intel processors.Since the values of po

Bug#420300: Workaround found, but no solution for the bug

2007-05-08 Thread Hans-Joachim Zierke
Several attempts were undertaken, to solve the problem with different video modes, especially modes very close to each other. No success. Several kernel attributes for the framebuffer were tried, like init - noinit etc. No success. Different settings for the X-Server were tried. Of these, set

Processed: tagging 387640, tagging 387640

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > tags 387640 confirmed Bug#387640: usplash timeout stays on vt8. Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: confirmed > tags 387640 - moreinfo Bug#387640: usplash timeout stays on vt8. Tags were

Bug#387640: can reproduce

2007-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
Yes, I can reproduce this with 0.4-43-2. After timeout I'm left on a blank vt and had to alt-f1 to get back. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#422924: incomplete man page

2007-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
Package: usplash Version: 0.4-43-2 Severity: normal The usplash man page fails to document at least -v, -x, and -y. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-686 (S

Bug#422925: should enable verbose mode for shutdown too

2007-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
Package: usplash Version: 0.4-43-2 Severity: wishlist Unless "quiet" is set in the kernel command line, usplash boots up in verbose mode, with the box showing init script output. However, shutdown always happens in quiet mode currently. I think for consistency, the init script should pass -v whe

Bug#422922: interacts badly with gdm init script

2007-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
Package: usplash Version: 0.4-43-2 Severity: normal gdm's init script starts it at rc2.d/S30gdm. This is before rc2.d/S98usplash stops usplash. So on my system, I see the following behavior: gdm starts, which turns the screen black. As mentioned in the other bug report, at least on my system, X f

Bug#422920: usplash is started, but not stopped

2007-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
Package: usplash Version: 0.4-43-2 Severity: important The initramfs-tools script starts usplash unless the kernel is booted with "nosplash", but the init script inconsistently stops it only if the kernel is booted with "splash". Therefore, if the kernel is booted with neither parameter, usplash i

Bug#381104: not limited only to qemu and slow machines

2007-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
My laptop is fairly fast, but I can still reproduce this bug easily enough, by booting it with a DVD in the drive. When the initramfs first runs udev to prior to mounting the root filesystem, it scans all drives including the DVD drive, this involves spinning up the DVD, and my laptop's DVD drive i

Bug#422713: [Pkg-pciutils-discuss] Bug#422713: lspci does not list anything (etch and dailies)

2007-05-08 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:43:26AM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote: > On 08/05/07, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >reassign 422713 pciutils > >tags 422713 d-i > > Probably I would have assigned this to the kernel than to pciutils. > > (OTOH, taking into account that (probably) due to thi

Bug#422675: Acknowledgement (sis900: tons of corrupted packets are reported)

2007-05-08 Thread Tobias Stefan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 18:26 +0200, Tobias Stefan Richter wrote: > > * limiting to 10MBit-FD with mii-tool helped: no more > > errors, rsync works > > You might want to try 100MBit-HD, I've had similar issues with this NIC > chipset, and it came down to the impl

Processed: reassign 422848 to dpkg

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 > reassign 422848 dpkg Bug#422848: ftbfs on ia64 Bug reassigned from package `usplash' to `dpkg'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#419249: linux-image-2.6.18-4-alpha-smp: epoll always returns ENOSYS

2007-05-08 Thread Jan Korbel
Hello. I have the same problem :( Both squid versions (2.6 and 3.0) use epoll and are unusable. J. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#422848: ftbfs on ia64

2007-05-08 Thread Christian T. Steigies
ine host architecture > ****** > Build finished at 20070508-1339 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] > > strange -1 build, need to investigate I had a couple of those after upgrading dpkg-dev to 1.14.0 (but not dpkg) on my m68k buil

Bug#422624: marked as done (log_action_end_msg return code inconsistent with lsb-base)

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2007 13:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422624: fixed in usplash 0.4-43-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#422761: marked as done (Should conflict with splashy)

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2007 13:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422761: fixed in usplash 0.4-43-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#422848: ftbfs on ia64

2007-05-08 Thread maximilian attems
20070508-1339 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] strange -1 build, need to investigate -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#422842: linux-image-2.6-k7: Should this point to newest 2.6-k7 linux image

2007-05-08 Thread Petteri
Package: linux-image-2.6-k7 Version: 2.6.18+6 Severity: minor This package points to linux-image-2.6.18-4-k7 althougt newer package is available (linux-image-2.6.20-1-k7). Should this package point always to newest linux image. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstab

Bug#410160: nfs-kernel-server: NFSv4 inconsistent client behaviour on etch

2007-05-08 Thread Jonathan Schmitt
This bug is not restricted to creation of files. It also occurs in the following scenario: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo A >> test.txt .. pass some time ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo B >> test.txt .. pass some time ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo A >> test.txt ... only gives [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/u

Bug#422624: postinst failure starting mdadm-raid

2007-05-08 Thread martin f krafft
> I feel confident to reassign this to usplash. If I log the end of an action > with a failure message, the command should not return with a non-zero exit > code > since logging the failure was actually successful. Standard lsb-base logging > functions properly return 0 here, so this is what uspla

Processed: retitle 422624 to log_action_end_msg return code inconsistent with lsb-base

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > retitle 422624 log_action_end_msg return code inconsistent with lsb-base Bug#422624: postinst failure starting mdadm-raid Changed Bug title to log_action_end_msg return code inconsist

Bug#383248: marked as done (usplash: Please add a default debian splash theme)

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 8 May 2007 10:08:37 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line usplash: Please add a default debian splash theme has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#383335: marked as done (/etc/init.d/usplash does not work with kbd package)

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 8 May 2007 10:16:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line /etc/init.d/usplash does not work with kbd package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: Re: postinst failure starting mdadm-raid

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 422624 usplash Bug#422624: postinst failure starting mdadm-raid Bug reassigned from package `mdadm' to `usplash'. > severity 422624 important Bug#422624: postinst failure starting mdadm-raid Severity set to `important' from `grave' > tags 422

Bug#387640: usplash timeout stays on vt8.

2007-05-08 Thread maximilian attems
tags 387640 moreinfo stop can you reproduce that with the latest usplash >= 0.4-43 thanks for your feedback -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: RE: usplash timeout stays on vt8.

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 387640 moreinfo Bug#387640: usplash timeout stays on vt8. There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Bug#396020: marked as done (no bootloader configuration on powerpc)

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 8 May 2007 10:10:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line no bootloader configuration on powerpc has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y