I'd like to add that OpenVZ kernel also supports ppc (powerpc64) and
sparc64.
Support for other arches is almost trivial to add, given the hardware to
test the stuff.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 01:49:17AM +0100, Greg Kochanski wrote:
> I got the following response from Intel. It's a little confused,
> perhaps. Or, maybe if you have ACPI turned on properly, perhaps
> the kernel can read the latency from the processor itself.
Yes, it's a bit confusing/confused.
,
Gostariamos de saber se recebeu nosso e-mail sobre como adquirir os ?
Tudo pronto para iniciar a sua divulgaçao?
Cordi
Your message dated Wed, 09 May 2007 11:36:19 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux-image-2.6.20-1-686: fails to boot from external usb HD -
doesn't wait long enough for root device to show up
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you c
I got the following response from Intel. It's a little confused,
perhaps. Or, maybe if you have ACPI turned on properly, perhaps
the kernel can read the latency from the processor itself.
Anyhow, he says that the latency is 10 - 100 microseconds for Intel
processors.Since the values of po
Several attempts were undertaken, to solve the problem with different
video modes, especially modes very close to each other. No success.
Several kernel attributes for the framebuffer were tried, like
init - noinit etc. No success.
Different settings for the X-Server were tried. Of these, set
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 387640 confirmed
Bug#387640: usplash timeout stays on vt8.
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: confirmed
> tags 387640 - moreinfo
Bug#387640: usplash timeout stays on vt8.
Tags were
Yes, I can reproduce this with 0.4-43-2. After timeout I'm left on a
blank vt and had to alt-f1 to get back.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: usplash
Version: 0.4-43-2
Severity: normal
The usplash man page fails to document at least -v, -x, and -y.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-686 (S
Package: usplash
Version: 0.4-43-2
Severity: wishlist
Unless "quiet" is set in the kernel command line, usplash boots up in
verbose mode, with the box showing init script output.
However, shutdown always happens in quiet mode currently. I think for
consistency, the init script should pass -v whe
Package: usplash
Version: 0.4-43-2
Severity: normal
gdm's init script starts it at rc2.d/S30gdm. This is before
rc2.d/S98usplash stops usplash. So on my system, I see the following
behavior:
gdm starts, which turns the screen black. As mentioned in the other bug
report, at least on my system, X f
Package: usplash
Version: 0.4-43-2
Severity: important
The initramfs-tools script starts usplash unless the kernel is booted
with "nosplash", but the init script inconsistently stops it only if the
kernel is booted with "splash". Therefore, if the kernel is booted with
neither parameter, usplash i
My laptop is fairly fast, but I can still reproduce this bug easily
enough, by booting it with a DVD in the drive. When the initramfs first
runs udev to prior to mounting the root filesystem, it scans all drives
including the DVD drive, this involves spinning up the DVD, and my
laptop's DVD drive i
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:43:26AM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> On 08/05/07, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >reassign 422713 pciutils
> >tags 422713 d-i
>
> Probably I would have assigned this to the kernel than to pciutils.
>
> (OTOH, taking into account that (probably) due to thi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 18:26 +0200, Tobias Stefan Richter wrote:
> > * limiting to 10MBit-FD with mii-tool helped: no more
> > errors, rsync works
>
> You might want to try 100MBit-HD, I've had similar issues with this NIC
> chipset, and it came down to the impl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> reassign 422848 dpkg
Bug#422848: ftbfs on ia64
Bug reassigned from package `usplash' to `dpkg'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Hello.
I have the same problem :(
Both squid versions (2.6 and 3.0) use epoll and are unusable.
J.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ine host architecture
> ******
> Build finished at 20070508-1339
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
>
> strange -1 build, need to investigate
I had a couple of those after upgrading dpkg-dev to 1.14.0 (but not dpkg) on
my m68k buil
Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2007 13:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422624: fixed in usplash 0.4-43-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2007 13:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422761: fixed in usplash 0.4-43-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
20070508-1339
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
strange -1 build, need to investigate
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6-k7
Version: 2.6.18+6
Severity: minor
This package points to linux-image-2.6.18-4-k7 althougt newer package
is available (linux-image-2.6.20-1-k7). Should this package point
always to newest linux image.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstab
This bug is not restricted to creation of files. It also occurs in the
following scenario:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo A >> test.txt
.. pass some time ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo B >> test.txt
.. pass some time ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo A >> test.txt
...
only gives
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/u
> I feel confident to reassign this to usplash. If I log the end of an action
> with a failure message, the command should not return with a non-zero exit
> code
> since logging the failure was actually successful. Standard lsb-base logging
> functions properly return 0 here, so this is what uspla
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> retitle 422624 log_action_end_msg return code inconsistent with lsb-base
Bug#422624: postinst failure starting mdadm-raid
Changed Bug title to log_action_end_msg return code inconsist
Your message dated Tue, 8 May 2007 10:08:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line usplash: Please add a default debian splash theme
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 8 May 2007 10:16:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line /etc/init.d/usplash does not work with kbd package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 422624 usplash
Bug#422624: postinst failure starting mdadm-raid
Bug reassigned from package `mdadm' to `usplash'.
> severity 422624 important
Bug#422624: postinst failure starting mdadm-raid
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 422
tags 387640 moreinfo
stop
can you reproduce that with the latest usplash >= 0.4-43
thanks for your feedback
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 387640 moreinfo
Bug#387640: usplash timeout stays on vt8.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Your message dated Tue, 8 May 2007 10:10:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no bootloader configuration on powerpc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
31 matches
Mail list logo