Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.31-1
Severity: important
When installing on lenny, linux-image-2.6.31-1-amd64 generates
lots of warnings with wrong modules paths.
Looks like firmware check is not working.
Распаковывается пакет linux-image-2.6.31-1-amd64 (из файла
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:32:52PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:05:45PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Bastian, is any of your Xen dom0 work available somewhere?
Yes. http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test.
The xen utils are
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 02:22:49PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Would this kernel work as a dom0 in Lenny?
No. It needs a newer hypervisor.
Can you also provide the source package so I can
recompile it with the Lenny gcc/libs?
The patch is there. You can apply it on the
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 20:40 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
hello David,
I have a question on howto ship firmware build out of
make deb-pkg in linux-2.6.
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 21:27 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Hi,
Is it a feature
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 14:40 +0100, Pierre Maziere wrote:
It seems that the update switched the /dev/sda and /dev/sdb which
explains the freeze during the boot sequence.
I switched the usb plugs and everything is now back to normal.
sorry for the noise
You should not expect that USB disks
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:56:20PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:13:27PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
pv_ops dom0 patches will require more maintenance than the forward-ports
though.. since it's not yet feature-complete, and will have many
patches and fixes still..
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 552422 + pending
Bug #552422 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6 2.6.31-1 FTBFS on mipsel
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the reply.
Situation is as follows:
my motherboard has an onboard soundcard. I own several PCI card soundcards.
I tried them all, all to the same result. If I have besides the onboard card
one PCI soundcard in the system (so 2 soundcards in total) the sound system
does not give
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:30:47AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
That's intentional. There is no need for it -- the firmware should live
in /lib/firmware.
If there are incompatible versions of firmware, then they'll have a
different filename and can co-exist.
This is, however, a challenge
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:17:52AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:48 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:30:47AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
That's intentional. There is no need for it -- the firmware should live
in /lib/firmware.
If there
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:48 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:30:47AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
That's intentional. There is no need for it -- the firmware should live
in /lib/firmware.
If there are incompatible versions of firmware, then they'll have a
different
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 11:31 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:17:52AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:48 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:30:47AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
That's intentional. There is no need for it -- the
Hi Ben,
Ack on everything below. Some comments are below.
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:14:54 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
I've drafted a policy based on what I believe to be best practice.
Please comment - is anything wrong, or anything missing? I also left
some questions in
There is a potential fix for this issue in the 2.6.26-20 kernel in
proposed-updates. Can someone who has seen this issue please verify
the fix?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Andres Salomon wrote:
2. Severities
Many submitters believe that their bug meets one of the following
criteria for high severity. We interpret them as follows and will
downgrade as appropriate:
'critical: makes unrelated software on the system (or the whole
system) break...'
The bug must
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:30:47AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
That's intentional. There is no need for it -- the firmware should live
in /lib/firmware.
If there are incompatible versions of firmware, then they'll have a
different filename and
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.31-1
Severity: important
When installing on lenny, linux-image-2.6.31-1-amd64 generates
lots of warnings with wrong modules paths.
Looks like firmware check is not working.
Распаковывается пакет linux-image-2.6.31-1-amd64 (из файла
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:38:49 +
Berni Elbourn be...@elbournb.fsnet.co.uk wrote:
Andres Salomon wrote:
2. Severities
Many submitters believe that their bug meets one of the following
criteria for high severity. We interpret them as follows and will
downgrade as appropriate:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:24:58PM +0100, Xan wrote:
Ben, it's a bug. At least formally.
Maybe, but not in the kernel. The kernel never documented this values to
be stable.
A capricious swap between harddrives
that hangs the system it's a bug I think,
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-19
Severity: important
We get the following backtrace way too often, it repeats for all CPUs,
but I'm pasting it only once here.
[633582.838114] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [init:1]
[633582.838114] Modules linked in: nfs lockd nfs_acl sunrpc ipip
Hello!
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:43:00AM +0100, I wrote:
10.jpg: fstype vg0-boole-root (ext3); mount /dev/mapper/vg0-boole--root
/root (failed -- no such file or directory?!).
I just noticed in linux-image-2.6.31-1-xen-amd64_2.6.31-1_amd64.deb's
/boot/config-2.6.31-1-xen-amd64 file:
I recently tried installing and rebooting into 2.6.30-2 on this
machine -- the problem with dropping blocks of audio is still present.
(This also happens on my desktop, which is an athlon-tbird with a
snd-cmipci)
Thanks,
Robert Jacobs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 552465 + pending
Bug #552465 [linux-2.6] r8169 does not work correctly for RTL8111
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.4
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
After a power grid problem in my neighborhood, my workstation
rebooted and detected problems in the ext4 LVM volumes.
It appears that after a manual fsck.ext4, these problems were
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail
=== linux-2.6:
= There are 26 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them.
See
Package: initramfs-tools
As I understand it this hook script that is being pached was up to now
essentially equivalent to the command 'true'.
It would detect if the kernel installed is an official Debian kernel or
a kernel-package kernel and then do nothing in both cases because the
kernels
Hi,
aolMee too!/aol It'd be really nice to have this integrated.
To add something constructive, mdadm, and lvm2 scripts already use sed
without checking for it or making sure that it is available, so the use
of sed should not be a problem. cryptsetup also uses sed but it at least
forces
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem
Version: 2.6.30-8
Severity: normal
If you use the linux 2.6.30 bigmem kernel with an intel graphic driver
(i810) Xorg does not find/use the intel driver.
I don't think this is an xorg issue, because if I start the normal
2.6.30 kernel everything is fine.
28 matches
Mail list logo
