Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
This problem occurs when booting 2.6.37, but not with 2.6.36.
I have three Radeon cards (HD 4350 / RV710), all using the free
driver in a Zaphod configuration. I have three different screens
connected, two DVI and one VGA. The
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-30
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
After upgrade to squeeze I can't wake up the PC anymore with USB
dongle (remote control) and probably the same thing applies to UPS
backup. It's nVidia ION based motherboard.
/proc/acpi/wakeup is properly configured:
USB0
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:24:06 +0100
Adam Sloboda j...@disorder.sk wrote:
bisogna attivarla sui tre pc
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-30
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
After upgrade to squeeze I can't wake up the PC anymore with USB
dongle (remote control) and probably the same
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-30
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
After upgrade to squeeze I can't wake up the PC anymore with USB
dongle (remote control) and probably the same thing applies to UPS
backup. It's nVidia
At Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:58:14 +,
maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-30
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
After upgrade to squeeze I can't wake up the PC anymore with USB
dongle (remote
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 04:14:18PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote:
At Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:58:14 +,
maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-30
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
After
At Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:06:14 +,
maximilian attems wrote:
There is no other version in the apt repository, I have nothing to
test. I was very lucky to find this package on my laptop.
There were *many* changes since, use http://snapshot.debian.org/
Sure, I am not disputing that. But
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:24:43PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote:
At Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:06:14 +,
maximilian attems wrote:
There is no other version in the apt repository, I have nothing to
test. I was very lucky to find this package on my laptop.
There were *many* changes since,
At Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:27:51 +,
maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:24:43PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote:
At Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:06:14 +,
maximilian attems wrote:
There is no other version in the apt repository, I have nothing to
test. I was very lucky to
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:48:25PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote:
The regression was introduced in 2.6.32-29
Right changelog has it:
* USB: Retain device power/wakeup setting across reconfiguration;
don't enable remote wakeup by default (Closes: #605246)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Mon, 7 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +
with message-id 20110207184422.gb21...@decadent.org.uk
and subject line Re: Bug#612300: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: USB devices can't
wakeup the system
has caused the Debian Bug report #612300,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: USB devices can't
At Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:27:49 +,
maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:48:25PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote:
The regression was introduced in 2.6.32-29
Right changelog has it:
* USB: Retain device power/wakeup setting across reconfiguration;
don't enable remote
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi,
So, my proposal in a nutshell is to only upload upstream 2.6.32 point
releases to wheezy/sid for the next 12-18 months. At that time,
reevaluate and determine what the next longterm cadence kernel will be,
and then once that is
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:12:48PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi,
So, my proposal in a nutshell is to only upload upstream 2.6.32 point
releases to wheezy/sid for the next 12-18 months. At that time,
reevaluate and determine
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-30
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
After upgrade from debian 5, I am unable to boot with kernel 2.6.32-5.
I can boot with the older kernel 2.6.22.
It's maybe due to newer PATA drivers.
I don't have all data for resolve because the problem is displayed
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:12:48 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi,
So, my proposal in a nutshell is to only upload upstream 2.6.32 point
releases to wheezy/sid for the next 12-18 months. At that time,
reevaluate and determine what the
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 16:28:31 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:12:48 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi,
So, my proposal in a nutshell is to only upload upstream 2.6.32 point
releases to wheezy/sid for the
2011/2/7 Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:12:48PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi,
So, my proposal in a nutshell is to only upload upstream 2.6.32 point
releases to wheezy/sid for the next 12-18 months. At that time,
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
What about introducing a new linux-2.6-stable kernel package as a
compromise? That way users that want stability and security support
in testing continue to have that as an option. Also, I will assume
responsibility as the maintainer, so
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
What does that buy us? It means instead of dealing with bugs on an
ongoing basis, you get them all at the same time and get to bisect along
many kernel versions at once instead of just one. It means problems
don't get reported (and fixed)
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 21:35 +0100, Stephane Purnelle wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-30
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Really, you tested an upstream version too?
After upgrade from debian 5, I am unable to boot with kernel 2.6.32-5.
I can boot with the older kernel 2.6.22.
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 22:54:53 -0500 Michael Gilbert wrote:
Even playing the numbers game with a bit more thoughtful analysis with
the LWN data, lenny looks a lot better. It can be seen that lenny
(2.6.26) was vulnerable to 69% (36 out of 52) of the vulnerabilities
listed there, and squeeze
This issue is present in the newly released Squeeze. Using kernel:
2.6.32-5-amd64
nfs-common: 1.2.2-4
nfs-kernel-server: 1.2.2-4
Workaround is by downgrading to lenny's version of nfs-comon and
nfs-kernel-server:
nfs-common: 1.1.2-6lenny2
nfs-kernel-server: 1.1.2-6lenny2
Fortunately, after some trial and error, I successfully built a
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common_2.6.32-30a~test package with the following two
commands:
export UPSTREAMVERSION=2.6.32-5
fakeroot make -f debian/rules.real binary-arch-featureset
Is this the right
24 matches
Mail list logo
